Comparison of Neonatal Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Responses Recorded with Linear and QuickScreen Protocols

References

• AHEAD. Newsletter of the European Concerted Action on Otoacoustic. Emissions 1995; 1: 1–4
   Google Scholar
• Kemp D T, Bray P B, Alexander L, Brown A M. Acoustic emission cochleography practical aspects. Scand Audiol Suppl 1986; 25: 71–94
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kemp D T, Ryan S. The use of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonatal hearing screening programs. Semin Hear 1993; 14: 3C, M-5
   Google Scholar
• White K R, Vohr B R, Behrens T R. Universal newborn hearing screening using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: results of the Rhode Island Hearing Assessment Project. Semin Hear 1993; 14: 18–29
   Google Scholar
• Maxon A B, White K R, Behrens T R, Vohr B R. Referral rates and cost efficiency in a universal newborn hearing screening program using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Am Acad Audiol 1995; 6: 271–277
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dirckx J JJ, Daemers K, Somers T H, Offeciers F E, Govaerts P J. Numerical assessment of TEOAE screening results: currently used criteria and their effect on TEOAE prevalence figures. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1996; 116: 672–679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton A R. High rate otoacoustic emissions. J AcoustSocAm 1993; 94: 132–136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton A R, Folkard T J, Chambers J D. Technical aspects of recording evoked otoacoustic emissions using maximum length sequences. Scand Audiol 1994; 23: 225–231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannesen P T, Rasmussen A N, Osterhammel P A. Instrumentation for transient evoked otoacoustic emissions elicited by maximum length sequences. Scand Audiol 1998; 27: 37–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatzopoulos S, Cheng J, Grzanka A, Morlet T, Martini A. Optimization of TEOAE recording protocols: a linear protocol derived from parameters of a time-frequency analysis: a pilot study on neonatal subjects. Scand Audiol 2000; 29: 21–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatzopoulos S, Petruccelli J, Pelosi G, Martini A. A TEOAE screening protocol based on linear click stimuli: performance and scoring criteria. Acta Otolaryngol 1999; 119: 135–139
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grandori F, Ravazzani P, Tognola G, Hatzopoulos S. Some factors influencing the recording and the interpretation of otoacoustic emissions evoked at different click intensity levels. Advances in otoacoustic emissions, R Thornton, F Grandori. Casa Editrice Stefanoni, Milan 1994; vol. 2: 48–64
   Google Scholar
• Grandori F, Ravazzani P, Tognola G, Hatzopoulos S. Derived non-linear versus linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Advances in otoacoustic emissions, R Thornton, F Grandori. Casa Editrice Stefanoni, Vol J Milan 1994; 48–64
   Google Scholar
• Culpepper N B. Neonatal screening via otoacoustic emissions. Otoacoustic emissions and clinical applications, M S Robinette, T J Glattke. Thieme, New York 1997; 233–270
   Google Scholar
• Hood J L, Berlin C T, Hurley A, Wen H. Suppression of otoacoustic emissions in normal hearing individuals. Hair cells and hearing aids, C Berlin. Singular, San Diego 1996; 57–72
   Google Scholar
• Hatzopoulos S, Cheng J, Grzanka A, Martini A. Time-frequency analyses of TEOAE recordings from normals and SNHL cases. Audiology 2000; 39: 1–12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qian S, Chen D. Discrete Gabor Transform. IEEE Trans Signal Processing 1993; 41: 2429–2439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian S, Chen D. Decomposition of the Wigner-Ville distribution and time-frequency distribution series. IEEE Trans Signal Processing 1994; 42: 2836–2841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorga M P, Neely S T, Bergman B, Beauchaine K L, Kaminslkei J R, Peters J, Jesteadt W. A comparison of transient-evoked and distortion product emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 2639–2648
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieve B A, Gorga M P, Schmidt A, Neely S T, Peters J, Schulte L, Jesteadt W. Analysis of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal hearing and hearing impaired ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 93: 3308–3319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welzl-Muller K, Stephan K. Confirmation of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions based on user-independent criteria. Audiology 1994; 33: 28–36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bray P. Click evoked otoacoustic emissions and the development of a clinical otoacoustic hearing test instrument. University College and Middlesex School of Medicine, London, Doctoral dissertation 1989
   Google Scholar
• Lutman M E, Jennings K, Davis A C, Houston H G, Meredith R. Coloration of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions by characteristics of the recording apparatus. Advances in otoacoustic emissions, F Grandori, L Collet, D Kemp, G Salomon, K Shorn, R Thornton. Casa Editrice Stefanoni, Milan 1994; vol. 1: 48–64
   Google Scholar
• Osterhammel P A, Rasmussen A N, Olsen S, Nielsen L H. The influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions on the amplitude of transient-evoked emissions. Scand Audiol 1996; 25: 187–192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen A N, Osterhammel P A, Johannesen P T, Borgkvist B. Neonatal hearing screening using otoacoustic emissions elicited by maximum length sequences. Br J Audiol 1998; 32: 355–366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatzopoulos S, Prosser S, Mazzoli M, Rosignoli M, Martini A. On the clinical applicability of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs)−. the use of spectral discriminant functions in the identification and classification of hearing loss. Audiol Neurol Otol 1998; 3: 402–418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar