Effect of Order Bias on the Recognition of Dichotic Digits in Young and Elderly Listeners

References

• Broadbent D E. The role of auditory localization in attention and memory span. J Exp Psychol 1954; 47: 191–196
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kimura D. Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Can J Psychol 1961; 15: 156–165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryden M P. Ear preference in auditory perception. J Exp Psychol 1963; 65: 103–105
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Musiek F E. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction: the dichotic digit test revisited. Ear Hear 1983; 4: 79–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiek F E, Gollegly K M, Kibbe K S, Verkest-Lenz S B. Proposed screening test for central auditory disorders: follow-up on the dichotic digits test. AmJOtol 1991; 12: 109–113
   Google Scholar
• Speaks C, Niccum N, Van Tasell D. Effects of stimulus material on the dichotic listening performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss. J Speech Hear Res 1985; 28: 16–25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strouse A, Wilson R H. Stimulus length uncertainty and dichotic digit recognition. J Am Acad Audiol 1999; 10: 219–229
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strouse A, Wilson R H. Recognition of 1-, 2-, and 3-pair dichotic digits under free and directed recall. J Am Acad Audiol 1999; 10: 557–571
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Humes L E, Coughlin M, Talley L. Evaluation of the use of a new compact disc for auditory perceptual assessment in the elderly. J Am Acad Audiol 1996; 7: 419–427
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strouse A L, Hall J W. Test-retest reliability of a dichotic digits test for assessing central auditory function in Alzheimer's disease. Audiology 1995; 34: 85–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hugdahl K. Handbook of dichotic listening: theory, methods and research. John Wiley and Sons, New York 1988
   Google Scholar
• Musiek F E, Gollegly K M, Baran J A. Myelination of the corpus callosum in learning disabled children: theoretical and clinical correlates. Semin Hear 1984; 5: 219–229
   Google Scholar
• Wilson R H, Jaffe M S. Interactions of age, ear, and stimulus complexity on dichotic digit recognition. J Am Acad Audiol 1996; 7: 358–364
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Creelman C D. Detection of signals of uncertain frequency. J Acoust Soc Am 1960; 32: 805–810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green D M. Detection of auditory sinusoids of uncertain frequency. J Acoust Soc Am 1961; 33: 897–903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strouse A, Wilson R H. Recognition of dichotic digits under pre-cued and post-cued response conditions in young and elderly listeners, Br J Audiol (in press)
   Google Scholar
• Geffen G. The development of the right ear advantage in dichotic listening with focused attention. Cortex 1978; 14: 169–177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sexton M A, Geffen G. Phonological fusion in dichotic monitoring. J Exp Psychol 1981; 7: 422–429
   Google Scholar
• Clark C R, Geffen L B, Geffen G. Invariant properties of auditory perceptual asymmetry assessed by dichotic monitoring. Handbook of dichotic listening: theory, methods, and research, K Hugdahl. John Wiley and Sons, New York 1988; 71–83
   Google Scholar
• Hugdahl K, Andersson L. The “forced-attention paradigm” in dichotic listening to CV syllables: a comparison between adults and children. Cortex 1986; 22: 417–432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugdahl K, Hammer A. Test-retest reliability for the consonant-vowel syllables dichotic listening paradigm. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1997; 19: 667–675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satz P, Achenbach E, Pattishall E, Fennell E. Order of report, ear asymmetry and handedness in dichotic listening. Cortex 1965; 1: 377–396
   Google Scholar
• Wilson R H, Dirks D D, Carterette E. Effects of ear preference and order bias on the reception of verbal materials. J Speech Hear Res 1968; 11: 509–522
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jerger J, Johnson K, Jerger S, Coker N, Pirozzolo F, Gray L. Central auditory processing disorder: a case study. J Am Acad Audiol 1991; 2: 36–54
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saul R, Gold S, Carlson D L, Wilson R H. The effects of various instructional sets on dichotic digit test performance. Richmond, VA, April. 1994, Presented at the American Academy of Audiology Convention
   Google Scholar
• Department of Veterans Affairs. Tonal and speech materials for auditory perceptual assessment, Disc 1.0. VA Medical Center, Long Beach, CA 1992
   Google Scholar
• Department of Veterans Affairs. Tonal and speech materials for auditory perceptual assessment, Disc 2.0. VA Medical Center, Mountain Home, TN 1998
   Google Scholar
• Studebaker J. A “rationalized” arcsin transformation. J Speech Hear Res 1985; 28: 455–462
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crowder R G, Morton J. Precategorical acoustic storage (PAS). Percept Psychophys 1969; 5: 365–373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota D A, Cowan N, Engle R W. Suffix interference in the recall of linguistically coherent speech. J Exp Psychol 1990; 16: 446–456
   Google Scholar
• Cowan N. Sensory memory and its role in information processing. Electroencephalogr Clin Neu-rophysiol Suppl 1995; 44: 21–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cowan N. On short and long auditory stores. Psychol Bull 1984; 96: 341–370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green D M, Weber D L. Detection of temporally uncertain signals. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 67: 1304–1311
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McKeever W F, Nolan D R, Diehi J A, Seitz K S. Handedness and language laterality: discrimination of handedness groups on the dichotic consonant-vowel task. Cortex 1984; 20: 509–523
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jerger J, Mahurin R, Pirozzolo F. The separability of central auditory and cognitive deficits: implications for the elderly. J Am Acad Audiol 1990; 1: 116–119
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson R C, Cole R E, Bowers J K, Foiles S V, Patrick J W, Woliver R E. Hemisphere efficiency in middle and later adulthood. Cortex 1979; 15: 109–119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar