Diagnostic Significance of the Electrocochleogram in Clinical Audiometry

References

• Aran J.-M. L'électro-chchléogramme. I. Principe et technique. II. Résultats. Comp. franç. Audiol. 1971a, No. 12: 13, Paris
   Google Scholar
• Aran J.-M. The electro-cochleogram; recent results in children and in some pathological cases. Arch. Ohr.Nas.-KhelkHeilk. 1971b; 198: 128–141
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aran J.-M., Le Bert G. Les réponses nerveuses conchléaires chez l'homme. Image du fonctionnement de l'oreille et nouveu test d'audiométrie objective. Rev. Laryung., Bordeaux 1968; 89: 361–378
   Google Scholar
• Aran J.-M., Portmann M., Delaunay J., Pélerin J., Lenoir J. L'électro-conchléo-gramme: méthodes et premiers résultats chez l'enfant. Rev. Laryng., Bordeaux 1969; 90: 615–634
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beagley H. A. Progress in objective audiometry. J. Laryng. 1972; 85: 225–235
   Google Scholar
• Coats A.C., Dickey J. R. Nonsurgical recording of human auditory nerve action potentials and cochlear microphonics. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryng. St. Louis 1970; 74: 844–852
   Google Scholar
• Cody D. T. R., Griffing T., Taylor W. F. Assessment of the newer tests of auditory function. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryng., St. Louis 1968; 77: 686–706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles R. R. A. Can present day audiology really help in diagnosis? An otologist's question. J. Laryng. 1972; 86: 191–244
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis H. Peripheral coding of auditory information; in Rosenblith Sensory communication. MIT Press, Cambridge 1961; 119–141
   Google Scholar
• Davis H. A functional classification of auditory defects. Ann Otol. Rhinol. Laryng., St. Louis 1962; 71: 693–705
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis H. Slow cortical responses evoked by acoustic stimuli. Acta oto-laryng., Stockh. 1965; 59: 179–185
   Google Scholar
• Davis H. Validation of evoked-response audiometry (ERA) in deaf children. Int. Audiology 1966; 5: 77–81
   Google Scholar
• Davis H. Averaged-evoked-response EEG audiometry in north America. Acta oto-laryng., Stockh. 1968; 65: 79–85
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis H. Abnormal hearing and deafness; in Davis and Silverman Hearing and deafness; 3rd ed. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York 1970; 83–139
   Google Scholar
• Davis H. Is ERA ready for routine clinical use? Arch. Ohr.Nas.-KehlkHeilk. 1971; 198: 2–8
   Google Scholar
• Davis H., Hirsh S. Kh., Selnutt J., Bowers C. Further validation of evoked response audiometry (ERA). J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1967; 10: 717–732
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Derbyshire A. J., Davis H. The action potentials of auditory nerve. Amer. J. Physiol. 1935; 113: 476–504
   Google Scholar
• Goodhill V. External conductive hypacusis and the fixed malleus syndrome. Acta oto-laryng., Stockh. 1966; 1–43, Suppl. 217
   Google Scholar
• Keidel W. D. The use of quick correlators in electro-cochleography both in oto-audiography (OAG) and in neuro-audiology (NAG). Rev. Laryng., Bordeaux 1971; 709–720, Suppl. 92
   Google Scholar
• Kiang N. Y.-S., Watanabe T., Thomas E. C., Clark L. F. Discharge patterns of single fibers in the cat's auditory nerve. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge 1965
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence M., McCabe B. F. Inner-ear mechanics and deafness; special consideration of Ménière's syndrome. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 1959; 171: 1927–1932
   Google Scholar
• Portmann M., Aran J.-M. Electro-Cochléographie sur le nourrission et le jeune enfant. Acta oto-laryng., Stockh. 1971; 71: 253–261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portmann M, Aran J.-M., Le Bert G. Electro-cochléorgamme humain en dehors de l'intervention chirurgicale. Acta Oto-laryng., Stockh. 1968; 65: 105–114
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Portmann M., Le Bert G., Aran J.-M. Potentiels conhléaires obtenus chez l'homme en dehors de toute intervention chirurgicale. Note préliminaire. Rev. Laryng., Bordeaux 1967; 88: 157–164
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenblith W. A., Rosenzweig M. R. Electrical response to acoutic clicks; influence of electrode locaction in cats. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 1951; 23: 585–588
   Google Scholar
• Salomon G., Elberling C. Cochlear nerve potentials recorded form the ear canal in man. Acta oto-laryng. 1971; 71: 319–325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuknecht H. F. Ménière's disease; a correlation of symptomatology and pathology. Laryngoscope 1963; 73: 651–665
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schuknecht H. F., Benitez J. T., Beekhuis J. Further observations of the pathology of Ménière's disease. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryng., St. Louis 1962; 71: 1039–1054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons F. B., Mongeon C. J. Endolymphatic duct pressure produces cochlear damage. Arch. Otolaryng. 1967; 85: 143–150
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sohmer H., Feinmesser M. Cochlear action potentials recorded from the external ear in man. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryng., St. Louis 1967; 76: 427–436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohmer H., Feinmesser M. Cochlear and cortical audiometry, conveniently recorded in the same subjects. Israel J. med. Sci. 1970; 6: 219–223
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sohmer H., Feinmesser M., Bauberger-Tell L. Routine use of cochlear audiometry in infants with uncertain diagnosis. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryng., St. Louis 1972; 81: 72–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spoendlin H. Degeneration behaviour of the cochlear nerve. Arch. Ohr.Nas.-KehlkHeilk. 1971; 200: 275–291
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spoendlin H. Innervation densities of the cochlea. Acta Oto-laryng., Stockh. 1972; 73: 235–248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreng M., Keidel W. D. Separierung von Cerebroaudiogramm (CAG), Neuro-audiogramm (NAG) und Otoaudiogramm (OAG) in der objektiven Audiometrie. Arch. Ohr.Nas.-KehlkHeilk. 1967; 189: 225–246
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spreng M., Keidel W. D. Problems of simple averaging of electro-physiological recordings and the use of additonal methods. Rev. Laryng., Bordeaux 1971; 722–738, Suppl. 92
   Google Scholar
• Taski I. Nerve impulses in individual auditory nerve fibers of guinea pig. J. Neuro-physiol. 1954; 17: 97–122
   Google Scholar
• Tasaki I., Fernández C. Modification of cochlear microphonics and action potentials by KCI solution and by direct currents. J. Neurophysiol. 1952; 15: 497–512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tos M. Bony fixation of the malleus and incus. Acta oto-laryng., Stockh. 1970; 70: 95–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshie N. Auditory nerve action potential responese to clicks in man. Laryngoscope 1968; 78: 198–215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshie N. Clinical cochlear response audiometry by means of an average response computer; non-surgical technique and clinical use. Rev. Laryng., Bordeaux 1971; 646–672, Suppl. 92
   Google Scholar
• Yoshie N., Ohashi T. Clinical use of cochlear nerve action potential responses in man for differential diagnosis of hearing losses. Acta oto-laryng., Stockh. 1969; 71–87, Suppl. 252
   Google Scholar
• Yoshie N., Ohashi T. Abnormal adaptation of human cochlear nerve action potential resposes; clinical observations by non-surgical recording. Rev. Laryng., Bordeaux 1971; 973–690, Suppl. 92
   Google Scholar
• Yoshie N., Ohashi T., Suzuki T. Non-surgical recording of auditory nerve action potentials in man. Laryngoscope 1967; 77: 76–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshie N., Yamaura K. Cochlear microphonic responses ro pure tones in man recorded by a non-surgical method. Acta oto-laryng., Sctockh. 1969; 37–69, Suppl. 252
   Google Scholar