The Masked Threshold to Noise Ratio in Brainstem Electric Response Audiometry: Assessment of the Conductive Loss Component by Bone-Conducted Masking

References

• Coats A C, Martin J L. Human auditory nerve action potentials and brainstem evoked responses: Effect of audiogram shape and lesion location. Arch Otolaryngol 1977; 103: 605–622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger J, Mauldin L. Prediction of sensorineural hearing loss from the brainstem evoked response. Arch Otolaryngol 1978; 104: 456–461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galambos R, Hecox K E. Clinical applications of the auditory brain stem response. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1978; 11: 709–720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauldin L, Jerger J. Auditory brainstem evoked responses to bone-conducted signals. Arch Otolaryngol 1979; 105: 656–661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh K T, Beardsley J V. Brainstem auditory evoked response. III. Clinical uses of bone conduction in the evaluation of otologic disease. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1979; 88: 22–28, (suppl 58)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann G, Flach M. Hirnstammaudiometrie bei akustischer Reizung über Knochen-und Luftleitung. Laryngol Rhinol 1981; 106: 392–395
   Google Scholar
• Kapteyn T S, Snel A M, Vis E C. The cancellation method for an accurate determination of an air-bone gap. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1980; 228: 199–204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapteyn T S, Boezeman E JHF, Snel A M. Bone-conduction measurement and calibration using the cancellation method. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 74: 1297–1299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang E Y, Rupert A L, Moushegian G. A developmental study of bone conduction auditory brainstem response in infants. Ear Hear 1987; 8: 244–251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boezeman E HJF, Kapteyn T S, Visser S L, Snel A M. Comparison of the latencies between bone and air conduction in the auditory brainstem evoked potential. Electroencephalogr Clin Ncurophysiol 1983; 55: 710–713
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van der Drift J FC, Drocaar M P, Van Zanten G A. Brainstem response audiometry. I. Its use in distinguishing between conductive and cochlear hearing loss. Audiology 1988; 27: 260–270
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van der Drift J FC, Brocaar M P, Van Zanten G A. Brainstem response audiometry. II. Classification of hearing loss by discriminant analysis. Audiology 1988; 27: 271–278
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van der Drift J FC, Van Zanten G A, Brocaar M P. Brainstem electric response audiometry: Estimation of the amount of conductive hearing loss with and without use of the response threshold. Audiology 1989; 28: 181–193
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hicks G E. Auditory brainstem response. Sensory assessment by bone conduction masking. Arch Otolaryngol 1980; 106: 392–395
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ysunza A. Chasquidos por conducción ossea versus enmascaramiento por vía ossea para evaluaciones de potenciales provocados auditivos de tallo cerebral en pacientes pediátricos. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex 1985; 42: 99–106
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ysunza A, Cone-Wesson B. Bone conduction masking for brainstem auditory-evoked potentials (BAEP) in pediatric audiological evaluations: Validation of the test. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1987; 12: 291–302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainville M J. New method of masking for determination of bone conduction curves. Trans Beltone Inst Hear Res 1959; 11: 1–40
   Google Scholar
• Jerger J, Tillman T. A new method for the clinical determination of sensorineural acuity level (SAL). Arch Otolaryngol 1960; 71: 948–953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Drift J FC, Brocaar M P, Van Zanten G A. The relation between the pure-tone audiogram and the click auditory brainstem response threshold in cochlear hearing loss. Audiology 1987; 26: 1–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lau C C. The effect of coupling force on bone conduction audiometry. Br J Audiol 1986; 20: 261–268
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGee T J, Clemis J D. Effects of conductive hearing loss on the auditory brainstem response. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1982; 91: 304–309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Drift J FC, Brocaar M P, Van Zanten G A, Lamore P JJ. Inaccuracies in the measurement of auditory brainstem response data in normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss. Audiology 1988; 27: 109–118
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katz J. Clinical Masking: Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore 1985; 197–198
   Google Scholar
• Rowe M J. The brainstem auditory response in neurological disease: A review. Ear Hear 1981; 2: 41–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid A, Thornton A RD. The effects of contralateral masking upon brainstem electric responses. Br J Audiol 1983; 17: 155–162
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finitzo-Hieber T, Hecox K E, Cone B. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in patients with congenital atresia. Laryngoscope 1979; 89: 1151–1158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Drift J FC. Brainstem Response Audiometry in the Determination of Hearing Loss; thesis Erasmus University. Rotterdam 1988
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. International Standard ISO 6189, Acoustics -Pure tone air conduction threshold audiometry for hearing conservation purposes. First edition 1983-12-01. 1983, Geneva, ISO
   Google Scholar
• Dirks D D. Factors related to bone conduction reliability. Arch Otolaryngol 1964; 79: 551–558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar