Formant Pattern Ambiguity of Vowel Sounds

References

• Ainsworth W. A. Perception of synthesized isolated vowels and h-d words as a function of fundamental frequency. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1971; 49: 1323–1324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainsworth W. A., Millar J. B. The effect of relative formant amplitude on the perceived identity of synthetic vowels. Language and Speech 1972; 15: 328–341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assmann P. K., Nearcy T. E., Hogan J. Vowel identification: Orthographic, perceptual, and acoustic factors. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1982; 71: 975–989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assmann P. F. The perception of back vowels: Center of gravity hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1991; 43A: 423–448
   Google Scholar
• Bennet G., Rodet X. Synthesis of the singing voice. Current directions in computer music research, M. V. Mathews, R. Pierce. MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts 1989; 19–44
   Google Scholar
• Bladon A. Arguments against formants in the auditory representation of speech. The representation of speech in the peripheral auditory system, R. Carlson, B. Granström. Elsevier, New York 1982; 95–102
   Google Scholar
• Bladon A., Ladefoged P. A further test of a two-formant model. Journal of the Acoustical Soceity of America 1982; 71: S104(A)
   Google Scholar
• Bladon A. Two-formant models of vowel perception: shortcoming and enhancements. Speech Communication 1983; 2: 305–313
   Google Scholar
• Bladon A., Henton C. G., Pickering J. B. Towards an auditory theory of speaker normalization. Language and Communication 1984; 4: 59–69
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloothooft G., Plomp R. Spectral analysis of sung vowels. II. The effect of fundamental frequency on vowel spectra. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1985; 77: 1580–1588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson R., Granström B., Fant G. Some studies concerning perception of isolated vowels. Quarterly Progress and Status Report (Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm, Speech Transmission Laboratory 1970; 2–3: 19–35
   Google Scholar
• Carlson R., Fant G., Granström B. Two-formant models, pitch and vowel perception. Auditory analysis and perception of speech, G. Fant, M. A. A. Tatham. Academic, London 1975; 55–82
   Google Scholar
• Chistovich L. A., Lublinskaya V. V. The ‘center of gravity’ effect in vowel spectra and critical distance between the formants: psychoacoustical study of the perception of vowel-like stimuli. Hearing Research 1979; 1: 185–195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chistovich L. A. Central auditory processing of peripheral vowel spectra. Journal of the Acoustical Society, of America 1985; 77: 789–805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen A., Slis I. H., Hart J. Perceptual tolerances of isolated Dutch vowels. Phonetica 1963; 9: 65–78
   Google Scholar
• Cornut G., Lafon J.-C. Etude acoustique comparative des phonémes vocaliques de la voix parlée et chantée. Folia phoniatrica 1960; 12: 188–196
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Delattre P. Un triangle acoustique des voyelles orales du français. French Review 1948; XXI: 6
   Google Scholar
• Delattre P., Liberman A. M., Cooper F. S., Gerstman L. J. An experimental study of the acoustic determinants of vowel color; observations on one- and two-formant vowels synthesized from spectrographic patterns. Word 1952; 8: 195–210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahey R. P., Diehl R. L., Trdunmüller H. Perception of back vowels: Effects of varying F1-F0 Bark distance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1996; 99: 2350–2357
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fant G. Acoustic analysis and synthesis of speech with applications to Swedish. Ericsson Technies 1959; 1: 3–108
   Google Scholar
• Fant G. Acoustic, theory of speech production. Mouton, s-GravenhageThe Netherlands 1970
   Google Scholar
• Fant G., Carlson R., Granström B. The [e]-[ø] ambiguity. Proceedings of the Speech Communication Seminar, Stockholm 1974; 3: 117–121
   Google Scholar
• Fujisaki H., Kawashima T. The roles of pitch and higher formants in the perception of vowels. IEEE Transuctions on Audio and Electroacoustics 1968; AU-16/1: 73–77
   Google Scholar
• Gottfried T. L., Chew St. L. Intelligibility of vowels sung by a countertenor. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1986; 79: 124–130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillenbrand J., Getty L. A., Clark M. J., Wheeler K. Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society, of America 1995; 97: 3099–3111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirahara T., Kato H. The effect of F0 on vowel identification. Speech Perception, Production and Linguistic Structure, Y. Tohkura, E. Vatikiotis-Bateson, Y. Sagisaka. Ohmsha, Tokyo 1992; 89–112
   Google Scholar
• Hoemke K. A., Diehl R. L. Perception of vowel height: The role of F1-F0 distance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1994; 96: 661–674
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jønrgensen H. P. Die gespannten und ungespannten Vokale in der norddeutschen Hochsprache mit einer spezifischen Untersuchung der Struktur ihrer Formantfrequenzen. Phonetica 1969; 19: 217–245
   Google Scholar
• Maurer D., Cook N., Landis T., D'Heureuse C. Are measured differences between the formants of men, women and children due to F0) differences. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1992; 21: 66–79
   Google Scholar
• Maurer D., GroUne B., Landis T., Hoch G., Schönle P. W. Re-examination of the relation between the vocal tract and the vowel sound with electromagnetic articulography (EMA) in vocalizations. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 1993; 7: 129–143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer D. Üher den Vokal. Hartung-Gorre, Konstanz 1994; 2 Volumes
   Google Scholar
• Maurer D., Lundis T. Fo-dependence, number alteration, and nonsystematic behaviour of the formants in German vowels. International Journal of Neuroscience 1995; 83: 25–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer D., Landis T. Intelligibility and spectral differences in high-pitched vowels. Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica 1996; 48: 1–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manrer D., Hess M., Gross M. High-speed imaged vocal fold vibrations and larynx movements within vocalizations of different vowels. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 1996; 105: 975–981
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maurer D., Klinkert A. The spectral difference of different vowels towards a new acoustical concept. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1997; 101, 3112(A)
   Google Scholar
• Miller R. L. Auditory tests with synthetic vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1953; 25: 114–121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller J. D. Auditory-perceptual interpretation of the vowel. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1989; 85: 2114–2134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsen R., Engebretson A. M. The accuracy of formant frequency measurements; a comparison of spectrographic analysis and linear prediction. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1983; 26: 89–97
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nearey T. M. Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception. Journal of 1989
   Google Scholar
• Palethorpe S., Wales R., Clark J. E., Senserrick T. Vowel classification in children. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1996; 100: 3843–3851
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petersen G. E., Barney H. L. Control methods used in a study of the vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1952; 24: 175–184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter R. K., Steinberg J. C. Toward the specification of speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1950; 22: 807–820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Carlo Scotto N., Germain A. A perceptual study of the influence of pitch on the intelligibility of sung vowels. Phonetica 1985; 42: 188–197
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slawson A. W. Vowel quality and musical timbre as functions of spectrum envelope and fundamental frequency. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1968; 43: 87–101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith L. A., Scott B. L. Increasing the intelligibility of sung vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1980; 67: 1795–1797
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strange W. Evolving theories of vowel perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1989; 85: 2081–2087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundberg J. Formant structure and articulation of spoken and sung vowels. Folia Phonioatrica 1970; 22: 28–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundberg J. The source spectrum in professional singing. Folia phoniatrica 1973; 25: 71–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sundberg J. Formant technique in a professional female singer. Acustica 1975; 32: 89–96
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg J. Synthesis of singing. Swedish Journal of Musicology 1978; 60: 107–112
   Google Scholar
• Traunmüller H. Perceptual dimension of openness in vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1981; 69: 1465–1475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traunmüller H. The role of the fundamental and the higher formants in the perception of speaker size, vocal effort, and vowel openness. PERILUS (Institute of Linguistics University of Stockholm) 1985; IV: 92–102
   Google Scholar
• Traunmüller H. A note on hidden factors in vowel perception experiments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1990; 88: 2015–2018
   PubMedGoogle Scholar