Event-Related Potentials for Category-Specific Information During Passive Viewing of Faces and Objects

References

• Aguirre G. K., Singh R., D'Esposito M. Stimulus inversion and the responses of face and object-sensitive cortical areas. Neuroreport 1999; 18: 189–194
   Google Scholar
• Alivisatos B., Petrides M. Functional activation of the human brain during mental rotation. Neuropsychologia 1997; 35: 111–118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison T., Ginter H., McCarthy G., Nobre A. C., Puce A., Luby M., Spencer D. Face reception in human extrastriate cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 1994; 71: 821–825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashbridge E., Walsh V., Cowey A. Temporal aspects of visual search studied by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropsychologia 1997; 35: 1121–1131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begleiter H., Porjesz B., Wang W., Zhang G. A neurophysiologic correlate of visual short-term memory in humans. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1993; 87: 46–53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bentin S., Allison T., Puce A., Perez E., McCarthy G. Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1996; 8: 551–565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biederman I. Recognition by components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review 1987; 94: 115–147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bötzel K., Schulze S., Stodieck S. R. Scalp topography and analysis of intracranial sources of face-evoked potentials. Experimental Brain Research 1995; 104: 1135–1143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce V., Humphreys G. Recognizing face and objects. Visual Cognition 1994; 1: 141–180
   Google Scholar
• Bruce V., Young A. Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology 1986; 11: 305–327
   Google Scholar
• Cohen M. S., Kosslyn S. M., Breiter H. C., DiGirolamo G. J., Thompson W. L., Anderson A. K., Brookheimer S. Y., Rosen B. R., Belliveau J. W. Changes in cortical activity during mental rotation: a mapping study using functional MRI. Brain 1996; 119: 89–100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damasio A. R., Damasio H., Van Hoesen G. W. Prosopagnosia: anatomic basis and behavioral mechanisms. Neurology 1982; 32: 331–341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damasio A. R. Prosopagnosia. Trends in Neurosciences 1985; 8: 132–135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Renzi E. Prosopagnosia in two patients with Ct scan evidence of damage confined to the right hemisphere. Neuropsychologia 1986; 24: 385–389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone R. Face-selective cells in the temporal cortex of monkeys. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1991; 3: 1–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond R., Carey S. Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1986; 115: 107–117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman S., Bülthoff H. H. Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of 3D objects. Vision Research 1992; 32: 2385–2400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eimer M. Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition. Clinical Neurophysiology 2000; 111: 694–705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eimer M. Does the face-specific N170 component reflect the activity of a specialized eye detector. Neuroreport 1998; 9: 2945–2948
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farah M. J., Wilson K. D., Drain H. M., Tanaka J. W. The inverted face effect in prosopagnosia: evidence for mandatory, face-specific perceptual mechanisms. Vision Research 1995; 35: 2089–2093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farah M. J. Visual agnosia: disorders of object recognition and what they tell us about normal vision. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1990
   Google Scholar
• Gauthier I. What constrains the organization of the ventral temporal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000; 4: 1–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier I., Behrmann M., Tarr M. J. Can face recognition really be dissociated from object recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1999; 11: 349–370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George N., Evans J., Fiori N., Davidoff J., Renault B. Brain events related to normal and moderately scrambled faces. Cognitive Brain Research 1996; 4: 65–76
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Halgren E., Baudena P., Heit G., Clarke J. M., Marinkovic K. Spatiotemporal stages in face and word processing. 1. Depth-recorded potentials in the human occipital, temporal and parietal lobes. Journal of Physiology (Paris) 1994; 88: 1–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harris I. M., Egan G., Sonkkila C., Tochon-Danguy H., Paxinos G., Watson J. Selective right parietal lobe activation during mental rotation: a parametric PET study. Brain 2000; 123: 65–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haxby J. V., Ishai I., Chao L. L., Ungerleider L. G., Martin I. Object-form topology in the ventral temporal lobe Response to Gauthier, I. (2000). Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000; 4: 3–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haxby J. V., Ungerleider L. G., Clark V. P., Schouten J. L., Hoffman E. A., Martin A. The effect of face inversion on activity in human neural systems for face and object perception. Neuron 1999; 22: 189–199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertz S., Porjesz B., Begleiter H., Chorlian D. Event-related potentials to faces: the effects of priming and recognition. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1994; 92: 342–351
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ishaï A., Ungerleider L. G., Martin A., Schouten J. L., Haxby J. Distributed representation of objects in the human ventral visual pathway. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 1999; 96: 9379–9384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffreys D. A. A face-responsive potential recorded from the human scalp. Experimental Brain Research 1989; 78: 193–202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy G., Puce A., Belger A., Allison T. Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. II. Response properties of face-specific potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 1999; 9: 431–444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil J. E., Warrington E. K. Prosopagnosia: a face-specific disorder. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1993; 46A: 1–10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscovitch M., Winocur G., Berhmann M. What is special about face recognition? Nineteen experiments on a person with visual object agnosia and dyslexia but normal face recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1997; 9: 555–604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puce A., Allison T., Asgari M., Gore J. C., McCarthy G. Differential sensitivity of human visual cortex to faces, letterstrings, and textures: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Neuroscience 1996; 16: 5205–5215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes G., Brake S., Atkinson A. P. What's lost in inverted faces. Cognition 1993; 47: 25–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson L., Treisman A., Friedman-Hill S., Grabowecky M. The interaction of spatial and object pathways: evidence from Balint's syndrome. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1997; 9: 254–276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossion B., Delvenne J. F., Debatisse D., Goffaux V., Bruyer R., Crommelinck M., Guerit J. M. Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect: an event-related potentials study. Biological Psychology 1999a; 50: 173–189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossion B., Campanella S., Gomez C. M., Delinte A., Debatisse D., Liard L., Dubois S., Bruyer R., Crommelinck M., Guerit J. M. Task modulation of brain activity related to familiar and unfamiliar face processing: an ERP study. Clinical Neurophysiology 1999b; 110: 449–462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossion B., Gauthier I., Tarr M. J., Despland P., Bruyer R., Linotte S., Crommelinck M. The N170 occipito-temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face-specific processes in the human brain. Neuroreport 2000; 11: 69–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeck M., Grüsser O. J. Category-related components in visual evoked potentials: photographs of faces, persons, flowers and tools as stimuli. Experimental Brain Research 1992; 92: 2338–2349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sergent J., Ohta S., MacDonald B. Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing: a positron emission tomography study. Brain 1992; 115: 15–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka J. W., Farah M. J. Parts and whole in face recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1993; 46A: 225–245
   Google Scholar
• Thompson P. Margaret Thatcher: a new illusion. Perception 1980; 9: 483–484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ungerleider L. G., Haxby J. V. What and where in the human brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 1994; 4: 157–165
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valentine T. Upside-down faces: a review of the effects of inversion upon face recognition. British Journal of Psychology 1988; 79: 471–491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin R. K. Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1969; 81: 141–145
   Google Scholar