References
- Fisher CM. Lacunar strokes and infarcts: a review. Neurology 1982;32(8):871–6.
- Caplan LR. Intracranial branch atheromatous disease: a neglected, understudied, and underused concept. Neurology 1989;39(9):1246–50.
- Yamamoto Y, Ohara T, Hamanaka M, et al. Characteristics of intracranial branch atheromatous disease and its association with progressive motor deficits. J Neurol Sci 2011;304(1–2):78–82.
- Nah HW, Kang DW, Kwon SU, Kim JS. Diversity of single small subcortical infarctions according to infarct location and parent artery disease: analysis of indicators for small vessel disease and atherosclerosis. Stroke 2010;41(12):2822–7.
- Zhang C, Wang Y, Zhao X, et al. Distal single subcortical infarction had a better clinical outcome compared with proximal single subcortical infarction. Stroke 2014;45(9):2613–9.
- Men X, Li J, Zhang B, et al. Homocysteine and C-reactive protein associated with progression and prognosis of intracranial branch atheromatous disease. PLOS One 2013;8(9):e73030.
- O'Leary DH, Polak JF, Kronmal RA, et al. Carotid-artery intima and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults. New England J Med 1999;340(1):14–22.
- Pantoni L. Cerebral small vessel disease: from pathogenesis and clinical characteristics to therapeutic challenges. Lancet Neurol 2010;9(7):689–701.
- Wardlaw JM, Smith C, Dichgans M. Mechanisms of sporadic cerebral small vessel disease: insights from neuroimaging. Lancet Neurol 2013;12(5):483–97.
- Kwan MW, Mak W, Cheung RT, Ho SL. Ischemic stroke related to intracranial branch atheromatous disease and comparison with large and small artery diseases. J Neurol Sci 2011;303(1–2):80–4.
- Chung JW, Kim BJ, Sohn CH, et al. Branch atheromatous plaque: a major cause of lacunar infarction (high-resolution MRI study). Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra 2012;2(1):36–44.
- Degnan AJ, Gallagher G, Teng Z, et al. MR angiography and imaging for the evaluation of middle cerebral artery atherosclerotic disease. Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33(8):1427–35.
- Yoon Y, Lee DH, Kang DW, et al. Single subcortical infarction and atherosclerotic plaques in the middle cerebral artery: high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging findings. Stroke 2013;44(9):2462–7.
- Nakase T, Yoshioka S, Sasaki M, Suzuki A. Clinical evaluation of lacunar infarction and branch atheromatous disease. J Stroke Cerebrovascular Diseases 2013;22(4):406–12.
- Nakase T, Yamamoto Y, Takagi M, Japan Branch Atheromatous Disease Registry C. The impact of diagnosing branch atheromatous disease for predicting prognosis. J Stroke Cerebrovascular Diseases 2015;24(10):2423–8.
- Terai S, Hori T, Miake S, et al. Mechanism in progressive lacunar infarction: a case report with magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Neurol 2000;57(2):255–8.
- Steinke W, Ley SC. Lacunar stroke is the major cause of progressive motor deficits. Stroke 2002;33(6):1510–6.
- Yamada M, Yoshimura S, Kaku Y, et al. Prediction of neurologic deterioration in patients with lacunar infarction in the territory of the lenticulostriate artery using perfusion CT. Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25(3):402–8.
- Seo WK, Seok HY, Kim JH, et al. C-reactive protein is a predictor of early neurologic deterioration in acute ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovascular Diseases 2012;21(3):181–6.
- Castellanos M, Castillo J, Garcia MM, et al. Inflammation-mediated damage in progressing lacunar infarctions: a potential therapeutic target. Stroke 2002;33(4):982–7.
- Burke GL, Evans GW, Riley WA, et al. Arterial wall thickness is associated with prevalent cardiovascular disease in middle-aged adults. Stroke 1995;26(3):386–91.
- Allan PL, Mowbray PI, Lee AJ, Fowkes FG. Relationship between carotid intima-media thickness and symptomatic and asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease. Stroke 1997;28(2):348–53.
- Cupini LM, Pasqualetti P, Diomedi M, et al. Carotid artery intima-media thickness and lacunar versus nonlacunar infarcts. Stroke 2002;33(3):689–94.
- Bots ML, Hoes AW, Koudstaal PJ, et al. Common carotid intima-media thickness and risk of stroke and myocardial infarction: the Rotterdam study. Circulation 1997;96(5):1432–7.