Left-Right Confusion and the Perception of Bilateral Symmetry

References

• Beale I. L., Williams R. J., Webster D. M., Corballis M. C. Confusion of mirror-images by pigeons and interhemispheric commissures. Nature 1972; 238: 348–349
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benton A. L. Right-left discrimination. Pediatric Clinics of North America 1968; 15: 747–758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blinkov S. M., Glezer I. I. The Human Brain in Figures and Tables. Plenum Press and Basic Books, New York 1968
   Google Scholar
• Bonin G. von. Anatomical asymmetries of the cerebral hemispheres. Inter-hemispheric Relations and Cerebral Dominance, V. B. Mountcastle. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore 1962
   Google Scholar
• Briggs G. G., Nebes R. D. Pattern of hand preference in a student population. Cortex 1975; 11: 230–238
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Butters N., Soeldner C., Fedio P. Comparison of frontal and parietal lobe spatial deficits in man: extrapersonal vs personal (egocentric) space. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1972; 34: 27–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corballis M. C., Beale I. L. Bilateral symmetry and behavior. Psychological Review 1970; 77: 451–464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corballis M. C., Beale I. L. The Psychology of Left and Right. John Wiley and Sons, New York 1976a
   Google Scholar
• Corballis M. C., Roldan C. E. On the perception of symmetrical and repeated patterns. Perception and Psychophysics 1974; 16: 136–142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corballis M. C., Roldan C. E. Detection of symmetry as a function of angular orientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1975; 1: 221–230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corballis M. C., Zbrodoff J., Roldan C. E. What's up in mental rotation. Perception and Psychophysics 1976b; 19: 525–530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming W. J. K. An anatomical review of the corpus callosum. Cortex 1970; 6: 1–18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Day H. I. The importance of symmetry and complexity in the evaluation of complexity, interest and pleasingness. Psychonomic Science 1968; 10: 339–340
   Google Scholar
• Eisenman R. Complexity-simplicity: I. preference for symmetry and rejection of complexity. Psychonomic Science 1967; 8: 169–170
   Google Scholar
• Ettlinger G., Elithorn A. Transfer between the hands of a mirror-image tactile shape discrimination. Nature 1962; 194: 1101–1107
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farrell W. S. Coding left and right. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1979; 5(1)42–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geschwind N., Levitsky W. Human brain: left-right asymmetries in temporal speech regions. Science 1968; 161: 186–187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodglass H., Quadfasel F. A. Language laterality in left-handed aphasics. Brain 1954; 77: 521–548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hécaen H., Albert M. L. Human Neuropsychology. Wiley, New York 1978
   Google Scholar
• Hécaen H., Sauguet J. Cerebral dominance in left-handed subjects. Cortex 1971; 7: 19–48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Julesz B. Foundations of Cyclopean Perception. University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1971
   Google Scholar
• Lashley K. S. The mechanisms of vision: XV. Preliminary studies of the rat's capacity for detail vision. Journal of General Psychology 1938; 18: 123–193
   Google Scholar
• LeMay M. Asymmetries of the skull and handedness. Journal of Neurological Science 1977; 32: 243–253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeMay M., Culebras A. Human brain-morphologic differences in the hemispheres demonstrable by carotid arteriography. New England Journal of Medicine 1972; 287: 168–170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mach E. The Analysis of Sensations. Open Court Publishing House, Chicago 1997, (reprinted by Dover Publications, 1959)
   Google Scholar
• Maki R. H., Grandy C. A., Haugue G. Why is telling right from left more difficult than telling above from below?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1979; 5(1)52–67
   Google Scholar
• Mello N. K. Mirror-image reversal in pigeons. Science 1965; 149: 1519–1520
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noble J. Paradoxical interocular transfer of mirror-image discriminations in the optic chiasm sectioned monkey. Brain Research 1968; 10: 127–151
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Orton S. T. Reading, Writing and Speech Problems in Children. W. W. Norton and Co., New York 1937
   Google Scholar
• Rudel R. G., Teuber H.-L. Discrimination of direction of line in children. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 1963; 56: 892–898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semmes J., Weinstein S., Ghent L., Teuber H.-L. Correlates of impaired spatial orientation in personal and extrapersonal space. Brain 1963; 86: 747–772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperry R. W. Some general aspects of interhemispheric integration. Interhemispheric Relations and Cerebral Dominance, V. B. Mountcastle. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore 1962
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland N. S. Visual discrimination of orientation and shape by Octopus. Nature 1957; 179: 11–13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teszner D., Tzavaras A., Gruner J., Hécaen H. L'asymmetrie droit-gauche du planum temporale, à propos de l'étude anatomique de 100 cerveaux. Revue Neurologique 1972; 126: 444–449
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teuber H.-L. The riddle of frontal lobe function in man. The Frontal Granular Cortex and Behavior, J. M. Warren, K. Akert. McGraw-Hill, New York 1964
   Google Scholar
• Wada J. A., Clarke R., Hamm A. Cerebral hemispheric asymmetry in humans. Cortical speech zones in 100 adult and 100 infant brains. Archives of Neurology 1975; 32: 239–246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf S. M. Difficulties in right-left discrimination in a normal population. Archives of Neurology 1973; 29: 128–129
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolff P. Mirror-image confusability in adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1971; 91: 268–272
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zangwill O. L. Cerebral Dominance and its Relation to Psychological Function. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh 1960
   Google Scholar