Digital pathology: exploring its applications in diagnostic surgical pathology practice

References

• Weinstein RS, Graham AR, Richter LC, et al Overview of telepathology, virtual microscopy, and whole slide imaging: prospects for the future. Hum Pathol 2009; 40: 1057–1069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glatz-Krieger K, Spornitz U, Spatz A, Mihatsch MJ, Glatz D. Factors to keep in mind when introducing virtual microscopy. Virchows Arch 2006; 448: 248–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojo MG, Garcia GB, Mateos CP, Garcia JG, Vicente MC. Critical comparison of 31 commercially available digital slide systems in pathology. Int J Surg Pathol 2006; 14: 285–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein RS. Innovations in medical imaging and virtual microscopy. Hum Pathol 2005; 36: 317–319.
   Google Scholar
• Jukiae MJ, Bifulco CB. Telepathology and pathology at a distance: an overview. Croatian Med J 1999; 40: 421–424.
   Google Scholar
• Kayser K, Kayser G, Radziszowski D, Oehmann A. From telepathology to virtual pathology institution: the new world of digital pathology. Rom J Morphol Embryol 1999–2004; 45: 3–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dee FR. Virtual microscopy in pathology education. Hum Pathol 2009; 40: 1112–1121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabe N, Schirmacher P. From virtual microscopy to systems pathology. Virchows Arch 2009; 455: 193–196.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein RS, Descour MR, Liang C, et al Telepathology overview: From concept to implementation. Hum Pathol 2001; 32: 1283–1299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soenksen D. Digital pathology at the crossroads of major health care trends. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2009; 133: 555–559.
   Google Scholar
• Krupinski EA. Virtual slide telepathology workstation of the future: lessons learned from teleradiology. Hum Pathol 2009; 40: 1100–1111.
   Google Scholar
• Tsuchihashi Y, Takamatsu T, Hashimoto Y, Takashima T, Nakano K, Fujita S. Use of virtual slide system of quick frozen intra-operative telepathology diagnosis in Kyoto, Japan. Diagn Pathol 2008; 15 (Suppl 1): S6.
   Google Scholar
• Evans AJ, Chetty R, Clarke BA, et al Primary frozen section diagnosis by robotic microscopy and virtual slide telepathology: the University Health Network experience. Hum Pathol 2009; 40: 1070–1081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park KJ, Reuter V. The use of digital microscopy for frozen section diagnosis: A validation study. Pathology Visions 2009; 13 (Abstr).
   Google Scholar
• Guzman M, Judkins AR. Digital pathology: A tool for 21st century neuropathology. Brain Pathol 2009; 19: 305–316.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez AM, Graham AR, Barker GP, et al Virtual slide telepathology enables an innovative telehealth rapid breast clinic. Hum Pathol 2009; 40: 1082–1091.
   Google Scholar
• Velez N, Jukic D, Ho J. Evaluation of 2 whole-slide imaging applications in dermatopathology. Hum Pathol 2008; 39: 1341–1349.
   Google Scholar
• Fine JL, Grzbicki DM, Silowash R, et al Evaluation of whole slide image immunohistochemistry interpretation in challenging prostate needle biopsies. Hum Pathol 2008; 39: 564–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helin H, Lundin M, Lundin J, et al Web-based virtual microscopy in teaching and standardized Gleason grading. Hum Pathol 2005; 36: 381–386.
   Google Scholar
• Ho J, Parwani AV, Jukic DM, Yagi Y, Antony L, Gilbertson JR. Use of whole slide imaging in surgical pathology quality assurance: design and pilot validation studies. Hum Pathol 2006; 37: 322–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molnar B, Berczi L, Ficsor L, Varga V, Tagscherer A, Tulassay Z. Digital slide and virtual microscopy-based routine and telepathology evaluation of gastrointestinal biopsy specimen. In: Kumar S, Dunn BE, editors. Telepathology. Berlin: Springer, 2009; 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Wienert S, Beil M, Saeger K, Hufnagl P, Scrader T. Integration and acceleration of virtual microscopy as the key to successful implementation into the routine diagnostic process. Diagn Pathol 2009; 4: 3.
   Google Scholar
• Slodkowska J, Chyczewsky L, Wojciechowski M. Virtual slides: application in pulmonary pathology consultations. Folia Hisotchem Cytobiol 2008; 46: 121–124.
   Google Scholar
• Wilbur DC, Madi K, Colvin RB, et al Whole-slide imaging digital pathology as platform for teleconsultation. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2009; 133: 1949–1953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom K, Harrington D. Enhanced accuracy of Her-2/neu immunohistochemical scoring using digital microscopy. Am J Clin Pathol 2004; 121: 619–630.
   Google Scholar
• Krenacs T, Zsakovics I, Diczhazi C, Ficsor L, Varga VS, Molnar B. The potential of digital microscopy in breast pathology. Pathol Oncol Res 2009; 15: 55–58.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel C, Rojo MG, Bourquard K, et al Standards to support information systems integration in anatomic pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2009; 133: 1841–1849.
   Google Scholar
• Kayser K, Gortler J, Goldmann T, Vollmer K, Hufnagl P, Kayer G. Image standards in tissue based diagnosis (diagnostic surgical pathology). Diagn Pathol 2008; 3: 17.
   Google Scholar
• Leung ST, Kaplan KJ. Medicolegal aspects of telepathology. Hum Pathol 2009; 40: 1137–1142.
   Google Scholar
• Lundin M, Szymas J, Linder E, et al A European network for virtual microscopy – design, implementation, and evaluation of performance. Virchows Arch 2009; 454: 421–429.
   Google Scholar
• Montalto MC, Cartwright G. From the incandescent light bulb to digital pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2009; 133: 550–552.
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA). Position Paper: Telepathology. Sydney: RCPA, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Rashbass J, Furness P. Telepathology: Guidance from The Royal College of Pathologists. London: The Royal College of Pathologists, May 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Gabril MY, Yousef GM. Informatics for practicing anatomical pathologists: marking a new era in pathology practice. Mod Pathol 2010; 23: 349–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaepplein A, Leica Microsystems. Histology automation and laboratory workflow: is automation right for my lab? Pathology Partners 2006; 3: 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Krupinski EA, Tillack AA, Richter L, et al Eye-movement study and human performance using telepathology virtual slides. Implications for medical education and differences with experience. Hum Pathol 2006; 37: 1543–1556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maybury T, Farah CS. Perspective: Electronic systems of knowledge in the world of virtual microscopy. Acad Med 2009; 84: 1244–1249.
   Google Scholar
• Kim YJ, Romeike BF, Uszkoreit J, Feiden W. Automated nuclear segmentation in the determination of the Ki-67 labeling index in meningiomas. Clin Neuropathol 2006; 25: 67–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chargari C, Comperat E, Le Moulec S, Richard F, Houlgatte A, Camparo P. Benefits of virtual microscopy on prostatic biopsy cores examination. Eur Urol Suppl 2008; 7: 285.
   Google Scholar
• Kalinski T, Zwonitzer R, Sel S, et al Virtual 3D microscopy using multiplane whole slide images in diagnostic pathology. Am J Clin Pathol 2008; 130: 259–64.
   Google Scholar
• Mori Ichiro, Nunobiki Osamu, Ozaki T, Taniguchi E, Kakudo K. Issues for application of virtual microscopy to cytoscreening, perspectives based on questionnaire to Japanese cytotechnologists. Diagn Pathol 2008; 3 (Suppl 1): S15.
   Google Scholar
• Furuya K, Maeda T, Nakanura S, Kikuchi T. The role of computer-aided 3-dimensional analytical tools and virtual microscopy in the investigation of radiologic-pathologic correlation. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2009; 133: 912–915.
   Google Scholar
• Ewald EJ, McBride H, Reddington M, Fraser SE, Kerschmann R. Surface imaging microscopy, an automated method for visualizing whole embryo samples in three dimensions at high resolution. Dev Dynamics 2002; 225: 369–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewald AJ, Peyrot SM, Tyszka JM, Fraser SE, Wallingford JB. Regional requirements for Dishevelled signaling during Xenopus gastrulation: separable effects on blastopore closure, mesendoderm internalization and archenteron formation. Development 2004; 131: 6195–6209.
   Google Scholar
• Jadin KD, Bae WC, Schumacher BL, Sah RL. Three-dimensional (3-D) imaging of chondrocytes in articular cartilage: Growth-associated changes in cell organization. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 230–239.
   Google Scholar