1,028
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Comparison of blood gas, electrolyte and metabolite results measured with two different blood gas analyzers and a core laboratory analyzer

, , , , , & show all
Pages 97-105 | Received 14 Mar 2014, Accepted 26 Oct 2014, Published online: 28 Nov 2014

References

  • Verma AK, Roach P. The interpretation of arterial blood gases. Aust Prescr 2010;33:124–9.
  • Leino A, Kurvinen K. Interchangeability of blood gas, electrolyte and metabolite results measured with point-of-care, blood gas and core laboratory analyzers. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49:1187–91.
  • Kampelmacher MJ, van Kesteren RG, Winckers EK. Instrumental variability of respiratory blood gases among different blood gas analyzers in different laboratories. Eur Respir J 1997;10:1341–4.
  • Budak YU, Huysal K, Polat M. Use of a blood gas analyzer and a laboratory autoanalyzer in routine practice to measure electrolytes in intensive care unit patients. BMC Anesthesiol 2012;12:17.
  • Scott MG, LeGrys VA, Klutts JS. Electrolytes and blood gases. In: Burtis DE, Ashwood ER, Bruns DE, editors. Tietz textbook of clinical chemistry and molecular diagnostics. St Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2006;983–1018.
  • D’Orazio P, Miller WG, Myers GL, Doumas BT, Eckfeldt JH, Evans SA, Graham GA, Parsons PJ, Stanton NV. Standardization of sodium and potassium ion-selective electrode systems to the flame photometric reference method; Approved Standard – 2nd ed. NCCLS document C29-A2. CLSI 2000;20:1–22.
  • Karon BS, Scott R, Burritt MF, Santrach PJ. Comparison of lactate values between point-of-care and central laboratory analyzers. Am J Clin Pathol 2007;128:168–71.
  • Steinfelder-Visscher J, Weerwind PW, Teerenstra S, Brouwer MH. Reliability of point-of-care hematocrit, blood gas, electrolyte, lactate and glucose measurement during cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion 2006;21:33–7.
  • Blonshine S, Fallon KD, Lehman CM, Sittig S. Procedures for the collection of arterial blood specimens; Approved Standard – 4th ed. NCCLS document H11-A4 2004;20: 1–21.
  • D’Orazio P, Ehrmeyer SS, Jacobs E, Toffaletti JG, Wandrup JH. Blood gas and pH analysis and related measurements; Approved Guideline – 2nd ed. CLSI document C46-A2 2009;29:1–49.
  • Forster J, Querusio L, Burchard KW, Gann DS. Hypercalcemia in critically ill surgical patients. Ann Surg 1985;202: 512–8.
  • Liao JJ, Lewis JW. A note on concordance correlation coefficient. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol 2000;54:23–6.
  • Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 1989;45:255–68.
  • Boonlert W, Lolekha PH, Kost GJ, Lolekha S. Comparison of the performance of point-of-care device analyzers to hospital laboratory instruments. Point Care 2003;2:172–8.
  • Vanavanan S, Chittamma A. Performance of a multi-profile critical care testing analyzer. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:9–14.
  • De Koninck AS, De Decker K, Van Bocxlaer J, Meeus P, Van Hoovels L. Analytical performance evaluation of four cartridge-type blood gas analyzers. Clin Chem Lab Med 2012;50:1083–91.
  • Dimeski G, Morgan TJ, Presneill JJ, Venkatesh B. Disagreement between ion selective electrode direct and indirect sodium measurements: estimation of the problem in a tertiary referral hospital. J Crit Care 2012;27(3):326.e9–16.
  • Chow E, Fox N, Gama R. Effect of low serum total protein on sodium and potassium measurement by ion-selective electrodes in critically ill patients. Br J Biomed Sci 2008; 65:128–31.
  • Story DA, Morimatsu H, Egi M, Bellamo R. The effect of albumin concentration on plasma sodium and chloride measurements in critically ill patients. Anesth Analg 2007; 104:893–7.
  • Loughrey CM, Hanna EV, McDonnell M, Archbold GP. Sodium measurement: effects of differing sampling and analytical methods. Ann Clin Biochem 2006;43:488–93.
  • Toffaletti JG. Ionised calcium. In: Hickman PE, Koerbin G, editors. Methods in clinical chemistry. New York: Elsevier; 2009; p. 770.
  • Oliver P, Fernandez-Calle P, Rico N, Alcaide MJ, Gomez-Rioja R, Buno A, Iturzaeta JM. Analytical performance evaluation and comparability of patient results within a point-of-care blood gas network. Point Care 2013; 12:144–9.
  • Van den Heuvel I, Vanhorebeek I, Van den Berghe G. The importance of strict blood glucose control with insulin therapy in the intensive care unit. Curr Diabetes Rev 2008; 4:227–33.
  • Stadlbauer V, Wallner S, Stojakovic T, Smolle KH. Comparison of 3 different multianalyte point-of-care devices during clinical routine on a medical intensive care unit. J Crit Care 2011;26:433.e1–11.
  • Corstjens AM, Ligtenberg JJ, van der Horst IC, Spanjersberg R, Lind JS, Tulleken JE, Meertens JHJM, Zijlstra JG Accuracy and feasibility of point-of care and continuous blood glucose analysis in critically ill ICU patients. Crit Care 2006;10:R135.
  • Hoedemaekers CW, Klein Gunnewiek JM, Prinsen MA, Willems JL, Van der Hoeven JG. Accuracy of bedside glucose measurement from three glucometers in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2008;36:3062–6.
  • Slater-MacLean L, Cembrowski G, Chin D, Shalapay C, Binette T, Hegadoren K, Newburn-Cook C. Accuracy of glycemic measurements in the critically ill. Diabetes Technol Ther 2008;10:169–77.
  • Kanji S, Buffie J, Hutton B, Bunting PS, Singh A, McDonald K, Fergusson D, McIntyre LA, Hebert PC. Reliability of point-of-care testing for glucose measurement in critically ill adults. Crit Care Med 2005;33:2778–85.
  • Petersen JR, Graves DF, Tacker DH, Okorodudu AO, Mohammad AA, Cardenas VJ Jr. Comparison of POCT and central laboratory blood glucose results using arterial, capillary, and venous samples from MICU patients on a tight glycemic protocol. Clin Chim Acta 2008;396:10–3.
  • Nichols JH, Christenson RH, Clarke W, Gronowski A, Hammett-Stabler CA, Jacobs E, Kazmierczak S, Lewandrowski K, Price C, Sacks DB, Sautter RL, Shipp G, Sokoll L, Watson ID, Winter W, Zucker ML; National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry. Executive summary. The National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines: evidence-based practice for point of care testing. Clin Chim Acta 2007;379:14–28.
  • Krouwer JS, Tholen DW, Garber CC, Goldschmidt HMJ, Kroll MH, Linnet K, Meier K, Robinowitz M, Kennedy JW. Method comparison and bias estimation using patient samples; Approved Guideline – 2nd ed. NCCLS document EP9-A2 2002;22:1–53.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.