Plain magnetic resonance imaging as an alternative in evaluating inflammation and bowel damage in inflammatory bowel disease – a prospective comparison with conventional magnetic resonance follow-through

References

• MDJensen, JKjeldsen, TNathan, SRRafaelsen. Diagnostic imaging and endoscopic methods in Crohn’s disease of the small intestine. Ugeskr Laeger 2009;171:2383–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SMMadsen, HSThomsen, PMunkholm, PSchlichting, BDavidsen. A bdominal I maging magnetic resonance imaging of Crohn disease: early recognition of treatment response and relapse. Abdom Imaging 1997;22:164–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• JRimola, SRodriguez, OGarcía-Bosch, IOrdás, EAyala, MAceituno, et al. Magnetic resonance for assessment of disease activity and severity in ileocolonic Crohn’s disease. Gut 2009;58:1113–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BPariente, LPeyrin-Biroulet, LCohen, A-MZagdanski, J-FColombel. Gastroenterology review and perspective: the role of cross-sectional imaging in evaluating bowel damage in Crohn disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197:42–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AOussalah, VLaurent, OBruot, ABressenot, M-ABigard, DRégent, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance without bowel preparation for detecting colonic inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 2010;59:1056–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OKılıçkesmez, ASoylu, NYaşar, TDemirbaş, CDolapçıoğlu, SPoturoğlu, et al. Is quantitative diffusion-weighted MRI a reliable method in the assessment of the inflammatory activity in ulcerative colitis? Diagn Interv Radiol 2010;16:293–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• RSinha, PRajiah, IRamachandran, SSanders, PDMurphy. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract: technique, indications, and imaging findings. Radiographics 2013;33:655–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ANegaard, LSandvik, AEBerstad, VPaulsen, ILygren, ABorthne, et al. MRI of the small bowel with oral contrast or nasojejunal intubation in Crohn’s disease: randomized comparison of patient acceptance. Scand J Gastroenterol 2008;43:44–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GMasselli, ECasciani, EPolettini, GGualdi. Comparison of MR enteroclysis with MR enterography and conventional enteroclysis in patients with Crohn’s disease. Eur Radiol 2008;18:438–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AGSchreyer, AGeissler, HAlbrich, SFeuerbach, GRogler, MVOLk, et al. Abdominal MRI after enteroclysis or with oral contrast in patients with suspected or proven Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004;2:491–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DGAltman. Statistics and ethics in medical research III How large a sample? Br Med J 1980;281:1336–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JSim, CCWright. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther 2005;85:257–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AJViera, JMGarrett. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 2005;37:360–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; 2013. ISBN 3-900051-07-0 Available from http://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• GVan Assche, ADignass, JPanes, LBeaugerie, JKaragiannis, MAllez, et al. The second European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn’s disease: definitions and diagnosis. J Crohns Colitis 2010;4:7–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AGutzeit, CABinkert, D-MKoh, KHergan, Cvon Weymarn, NGraf, et al. Evaluation of the anti-peristaltic effect of glucagon and hyoscine on the small bowel: comparison of intravenous and intramuscular drug administration. Eur Radiol 2012;22:1186–94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GMasselli, GGualdi. MR imaging of the small bowel 1. Radiology 2012;264:333–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KHorsthuis, SBipat, RJBennink, JStoker. Inflammatory bowel disease diagnosed with US, MR, scintigraphy, and CT: meta- analysis of prospective studies1. Radiology 2008;247:64–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AFurukawa, KMaeda, NNitta, MTakahashi, TTsujikawa, YFujiyama. Cross-sectional imaging in crohn disease. Radiographics 2004;24:689–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MDJensen, TOrmstrup, CVagn-Hansen, LØstergaard, SRRafaelsen. Interobserver and intermodality agreement for detection of small bowel Crohn’s disease with MR enterography and CT enterography. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2011;17:1081–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JRimola, IOrdás, SRodríguez, JPanés. Colonic Crohn’s disease: value of magnetic resonance colonography for detection and quantification of disease activity. Abdom Imaging 2010;35:422–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• TCLauenstein. MR colonography: current status. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1519–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• JRimola, SRodríguez, OGarcía-Bosch, ERicart, MPagès, MPellisé, et al. Role of 3.0-T MR colonography in the evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease. Radiographics 2009;29:701–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SKiryu, KDodanuki, HTakao, MWatanabe, YInoue, MTakazoe, et al. Free-breathing diffusion-weighted imaging for the assessment of inflammatory activity in Crohn’s disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;29:880–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• AQayyum. Diffusion-weighted imaging in the abdomen and pelvis: concepts and applications. Abdom Imaging 2009;29:1797–810.
   Google Scholar
• AOto, AKayhan, JTBWilliams, XFan, LYun, SArkani, et al. Active Crohn’s disease in the small bowel: evaluation by diffusion weighted imaging and quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;33:615–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KMElsayes, MMAl-Hawary, JJagdish, HSGanesh, JFPlatt. CT enterography: principles, trends, and interpretation of findings. Radiographics 2010;30:1955–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MJMartínez, TRipollés, JMParedes, EBlanc, LMartíBonmatí. Assessment of the extension and the inflammatory activity in Crohn’s disease: comparison of ultrasound and MRI. Abdom Imaging 2009;34:141–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DJTolan, RGreenhalgh, IAZealley, SHalligan, SATaylor. MR enterographic manifestations of small bowel Crohn disease. Radiographics 2010;30:367–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AGSchreyer, CMenzel, CFriedrich, FPoschenrieder, LEgger, CDornia, et al. Comparison of high-resolution ultrasound and MR-enterography in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 2011;17:1018–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PPatel, MOrmanoski, KMHoadley. Magnetic Resonance Enterography Findings in Crohn’s disease in the pediatric population and correlation with fluoroscopic and multidetector computed tomographic techniques. J Clin Imaging Sci 2011;1:41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LSun, HWu, Y-SGuan. Colonography by CT, MRI and PET/CT combined with conventional colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening and staging. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14:853–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• NGriffin, LAGrant, SAnderson, PIrving, JSanderson. Small bowel MR enterography: problem solving in Crohn’s disease. Insights Imaging 2012;3:251–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• AKayhan, JOommen, FDahi, AOto. Magnetic resonance enterography in Crohn’s disease: standard and advanced techniques. World J Radiol 2010;2:113–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• FBooya, JGFletcher, JEHuprich, JMBarlow, CDJohnson, JLFidler, et al. Active crohn disease: CT findings and interobserver agreement for enteric phase CT enterography1. Radiology 2006;241:787–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SRPaulsen, JEHuprich, JGFletcher, FBooya, BMYoung, JLFidler, et al. CT enterography as a diagnostic tool in eval- uating small bowel disorders: review of clinical experience with over 700 cases 1. Radiographics 2006;26:641–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MEBaker, DMEinstein, JCVeniero, DPh. Computed tomography enterography and magnetic resonance enterography: the future of small bowel imaging. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2008;21:193–212.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WTielbeek J a, FMVos, JStoker. A computer-assisted model for detection of MRI signs of Crohn’s disease activity: future or fiction? Abdom Imaging 2012;37:967–73.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ASharman, IAZealley, RGreenhalgh, PBassett, SATaylor. MRI of small bowel Crohn’s disease: determining the reproducibility of bowel wall gadolinium enhancement measurements. Eur Radiol 2009;19:1960–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KHorsthuis, AJNederveen, MWde Feiter, CLavini, PCStokkers, JStoker. Mapping of T1-values and Gadolinium-concentrations in MRI as indicator of disease activity in luminal Crohn’s disease: a feasibility study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;29:488–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SDuigenan, MSGee. Imaging of pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199:907–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MRodriguez-justo, ABainbridge, RGreenhalgh, EDe Vita, SBloom, RCohen, et al. Mural inflammation in crohn disease: location-matched histologic validation of MR imaging features1. Radiology 2009;252:712–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar