European panel on the appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy II guidelines help in selecting and prioritizing patients referred to colonoscopy – a quality control study

References

• de Jonge V, Sint Nicolaas J, van Baalen O, Brouwer JT, Stolk MF, Tang TJ, et al. The incidence of 30-day adverse events after colonoscopy among outpatients in the Netherlands. Am J Gastroenterol 2012;107:878–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crispin A, Birkner B, Munte A, Nusko G, Mansmann U. Process quality and incidence of acute complications in a series of more than 230,000 outpatient colonoscopies. Endoscopy 2009;41:1018–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins S, Arroll B, Hawken S, Nicholson R. Referral letters: are form letters better? Br J Gen Pract 1997;47:107–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonvers JJ, Harris JK, Wietlisbach V, Burnand B, Vader JP, Froehlich F. A European view of diagnostic yield and appropriateness of colonoscopy. Hepatogastroenterology 2007;54:729–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Balaguer F, Llach J, Castells A, Bordas JM, Ppellise M, Rodriguez-Moranta F, et al. The European panel on the appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy guidelines colonoscopy in an open-access endoscopy unit: a prospective study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005;21:609–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Esparrach G, Gimeno-Garcia AZ, Llach J, Pellise M, Gines A, Balaguer F, et al. [Guidelines for the rational use of endoscopy to improve the detection of relevant lesions in an open-access endoscopy unit: a prospective study]. Med Clin (Barc) 2007;129:205–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kmieciak Le Corguille M, Gaudric M, Sogni P, Roche H, Brezault C, Dieumegard B, et al. [Appropiateness of colonoscopy in a gastrointestinal unit in 2001: a prospective study using criteria established by a European panel of experts]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2003;27:213–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adler A, Roll S, Marowski B, Drossel R, Rehs HU, Willich SN, et al. Appropriateness of colonoscopy in the era of colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, multicenter study in a private-practice setting (Berlin Colonoscopy Project 1, BECOP 1). Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:1628–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vader JP, Burnand B, Froehlich F, Dubois RW, Bochud M, Gonvers JJ. The European Panel on Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE): project and methods. Endoscopy 1999;31(8):572–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vader JP, Froehlich F, Dubois RW, Beglinger C, Wietlisbach V, Pittet V, et al. JP, Burnand B, Froehlich F, Dubois RW, Bochud M, Gonvers JJ, et al. European Panel on the Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE): conclusion and WWW site. Endoscopy 1999;31(8):687–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juillerat P, Peytremann-Bridevaux I, Vader JP, Arditi C, Schussele Filliettaz S, Dubois RW, et al. Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II). Presentation of methodology, general results, and analysis of complications. Endoscopy 2009;41:240–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arditi C, Gonvers JJ, Burnand B, Minoli G, Oertli D, Lacaine F, et al. Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II). Surveillance after polypectomy and after resection of colorectal cancer. Endoscopy 2009;41:209–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arditi C, Peytremann-Bridevaux I, Burnand B, Eckardt VF, Bytzer P, Agreus L, et al. Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II). Screening for colorectal cancer. Endoscopy 2009;41:200–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peytremann-Bridevaux I, Arditi C, Froehlich F, O'Malley J, Fairclough P, Le Moine O, et al. Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II). Iron-deficiency anemia and hematochezia. Endoscopy 2009;41:227–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schussele Filliettaz S, Juillerat P, Burnand B, Arditi C, Windsor A, Beglinger C, et al. Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II). Chronic diarrhea and known inflammatory bowel disease. Endoscopy 2009;41:218–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schussele Filliettaz S, Gonvers JJ, Peytremann-Bridevaux I, Arditi C, Delvaux M, Numans ME, et al. Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II). Functional bowel disorders: pain, constipation and bloating. Endoscopy 2009;41:234–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Terraz OP, Wietlisbach V-BI, JeannotVader JG, Burnand BC, Froehlich FFS, Dubois RW, et al. The EPAGE internet guideline as a decision support tool for determining the appropriatenessAppropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II). Presentation of methodology, general results, and analysis of complications. DigestionEndoscopy 2005;7141:7240–6.
   Google Scholar
• Terraz O, Wietlisbach V, Jeannot JG, Burnand B, Froehlich F, Gonvers JJ, et al. The EPAGE internet guideline as a decision support tool for determining the appropriateness of colonoscopy. Digestion 2005;71:72–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bosset V, Froehlich F, Rey JP, Thorens J, Schneider C, Wietlisbach V, et al. Do explicit appropriateness criteria enhance the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy? Endoscopy 2002;34:360–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnand B, Harris JK, Wietlisbach V, Froehlich F, Vader JP, Gonvers JJ. Use, appropriateness, and diagnostic yield of screening colonoscopy: an international observational study (EPAGE). Gastrointest Endosc 2006;63:1018–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan C, Di Giulio E, Marmo R, Zullo A, Annibale B. Appropriateness of the indication for colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2011;20:279–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arguello L, Pertejo V, Ponce M, Peiro S, Garrigues V, Ponce J. The appropriateness of colonoscopies at a teaching hospital: magnitude, associated factors, and comparison of EPAGE and EPAGE-II criteria. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;75:138–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimeno Garcia AZ, Gonzalez Y, Quintero E, Nicolas-Perez D, Adrian Z, Romero R, et al. Clinical validation of the European Panel on the Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE) II criteria in an open-access unit: a prospective study. Endoscopy 2012;44:32–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrion S, Marin I, Lorenzo-Zuniga V, Moreno De Vega V, Boix J. [Appropriateness of colonoscopy indications according to the new EPAGE II criteria]. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;33:484–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froehlich F, Pache I, Burnand B, Vader JP, Fried M, Beglinger C, et al. Performance of panel-based criteria to evaluate the appropriateness of colonoscopy: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;48:128–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman D. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstad B. Kolorektale polypper. Tidsskr Nor Legeforen 2007;127:2692–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar