222
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Left-colon water exchange preserves the benefits of whole colon water exchange at reduced cecal intubation time conferring significant advantage in diagnostic colonoscopy — a prospective, randomized controlled trial

, , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 916-923 | Received 09 Dec 2014, Accepted 19 Jan 2015, Published online: 01 Feb 2015

References

  • DKRex. Achieving cecal intubation in the very difficult colon. Gastrointest Endosc 2008;67:938–44.
  • ZMFalchuk, PHGriffin. A technique to facilitate colonoscopy in areas of severe diverticular disease. N Engl J Med 1984;310:598.
  • UABaumann. Water intubation of the sigmoid colon: water instillation speeds up left-sided colonoscopy. Endoscopy 1999;31:314–17.
  • JWLeung, AThai, AYen, GWard, OAbramyan, JLee, et al. Magnetic endoscope imaging (ScopeGuide) elucidates the mechanism of action of the pain-alleviating impact of water exchange colonoscopy - attenuation of loop formation. J Interv Gastroenterol 2012;2:142–6.
  • HLuo, LZhang, XLiu, FWLeung, ZLiu, XWang, et al. Water exchange enhanced cecal intubation in potentially difficult colonoscopy. Unsedated patients with prior abdominal or pelvic surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2013;77:767–73.
  • FWLeung, HSAharonian, JWLeung, PHGuth, GJackson. Impact of a novel water method on scheduled unsedated colonoscopy in U.S. veterans. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:546–50.
  • JWLeung, SKMann, RSiao-Salera, KRansibrahmanakul, BLim, HCabrera, et al. A randomized, controlled comparison of warm water infusion in lieu of air insufflation versus air insufflation for aiding colonoscopy insertion in sedated patients undergoing colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;70:505–10.
  • FWLeung, JOHarker, GJackson, KEOkamoto, OMBehbahani, NJJamgotchian, et al. A proof-of-principle, prospective, randomized, controlled trial demonstrating improved outcomes in scheduled unsedated colonoscopy by the water method. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;72:693–700.
  • JLeung, SMann, RSiao-Salera, KRansibrahmanakul, BLim, WCanete, et al. A randomized, controlled trial to confirm the beneficial effects of the water method on U.S. veterans undergoing colonoscopy with the option of on-demand sedation. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73:103–10.
  • FCRamirez, FWLeung. A head-to-head comparison of the water vs. air method in patients undergoing screening colonoscopy. J Interv Gastroenterol 2011;1:130–5.
  • STejaswi, JStondell, CNgo, MDWilson. Increase in proximal adenoma detection rate after transition from air to water method for screening colonoscopy in a community-based setting in the United States. J Interv Gastroenterol 2013;3:53–6.
  • FWLeung, JWLeung, RMSiao-Salera, SkMann. The water method significantly enhances proximal diminutive adenoma detection rate in unsedated patients. J Interv Gastroenterol 2011;1:8–13.
  • SCadoni, PGallittu, SSanna, VFanari, MLPorcedda, MErriu, et al. A two-center randomized controlled trial of water-aided colonoscopy versus air insufflation colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2014;46:212–18.
  • JPohl, IMesser, ABehrens, GKaiser, GMayer, CEll. Water infusion for cecal intubation increases patient tolerance, but does not improve intubation of unsedated colonoscopies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011;9:1039–43; e1.
  • EBrocchi, RPezzilli, DCampana, PTomassetti, RCorinaldesi. Water-related techniques in colonoscopy: the end justifies the means!. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;70:1287–9; author reply 1289.
  • FWLeung, AAmato, CEll, SFriedland, JOHarker, YHHsieh, et al. Water-aided colonoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;76:657–66.
  • YHHsieh, MKoo, FWLeung. A patient-blinded randomized, controlled trial comparing air insufflation, water immersion, and water exchange during minimally sedated colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2014;109:1390–400.
  • SCadoni, SSanna, PGallittu, MArgiolas, VFanari, MLPorcedda, et al. A randomized, controlled trial comparing real-time insertion pain during colonoscopy confirmed water exchange to be superior to water immersion in enhancing patient comfort. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; pii: S0016-5107(14)01978-6. [ Epub ahead of print].
  • EJLai, AHCalderwood, GDoros, OKFix, BCJacobson. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:620–5.
  • WHKim, YJCho, JYPark, PKMin, JKKang, ISPark, et al. Factors affecting insertion time and patient discomfort during colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;52:600–5.
  • DKRex. Effect of variable stiffness colonoscopes on cecal intubation times for routine colonoscopy by an experienced examiner in sedated patients. Endoscopy 2001;33:60–4.
  • CWLeung, TKaltenbach, RSoetikno, KKWu, FWLeung, SFriedland, et al. Water immersion versus standard colonoscopy insertion technique: randomized trial shows promise for minimal sedation. Endoscopy 2010;42:557–63.
  • FRadaelli, SPaggi, AAmato, VTerruzzi. Warm water infusion versus air insufflation for unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;72:701–9.
  • KCVemulapalli, DKRex. Water immersion simplifies cecal intubation in patients with redundant colons and previous incomplete colonoscopies. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;76:812–17.
  • MLDavila, REDavila. The demise of air insufflation and the rise of the warm water infusion method. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;70:511–14.
  • JWLeung, SMann, RSiao-Salera, WCanete, DPrather, FWLeung, et al. The established and time-tested water exchange method in scheduled unsedated colonoscopy significantly enhanced patient-centered outcomes without prolonging procedural times - A randomized controlled trial. J Interv Gastroenterol 2013;3:7–11.
  • MFKaminski, JRegula, EKraszewska, MPolkowski, UWojciechowska, JDidkowska, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1795–803.
  • RValori, JFRey, WSAtkin, MBretthauer, CSenore, GHoff, et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition--Quality assurance in endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. Endoscopy 2012;44:SE88–105.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.