Are activity limitations associated with lower urinary tract symptoms in stroke patients? A cross-sectional, clinical survey

References

• Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 2002; 21: 167–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama H, Jørgensen HS, Pedersen PM, Raschou HO, Olsen TS. Prevalence and risk factors of incontinence after stroke. Stroke 1997; 28: 58–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolominski-Rabas P, Hilz MJ, Neundoerfer B, Heuschmann PU. Impact of urinary incontinence after stroke: results from a prospective population-based study register. Neurourol Urodyn 2003; 22: 322–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen L, Engstad T, Jacobsen B. Self-reported urinary incontinence in noninstitutionalized long-term stroke survivors: a population-based study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 416–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brittain KR, Perry SI, Peet SM, Shaw C, Dallosso H, Assassa RP, et al. Prevalence and impact of urinary symptoms among community-dwelling stroke survivors. Stroke 2000; 31: 886–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel M, Coshall C, Rudd AG, Wolfe CD. Natural history and effects in 2-year outcomes of urinary incontinence after stroke. Stroke 2001; 32: 122–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett JA. Bladder and bowel problems after stroke. Rev Clin Gerontol 2002; 12: 253–67
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, LH, Barret, J, Cross, S, French, B, Leathley, M, Sutton, C, , et al. Prevention and treatment of urinary incontinence after stroke in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005; (3): DOI:10.1002/14651858. CD004462.pub2.
   Google Scholar
• Tibaek S, Gard G, Klarskov P, Iversen HK, Dehlendorff C, Jensen R. Prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in stroke patients: a cross-sectional, clinical survey. Neurourol Urodyn 2008; 27: 763–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Grotle M, Brox JI, Vøllenstad NK. Functional status and disability questionnaires: what do they assess? A systematic review of back-specific outcome questionnaires. Spine 2004; 24: 378–82
   Google Scholar
• Kollen B, Kwakkel G, Lindeman E. Time dependency of walking classification in stroke. Phys Ther 2006; 86: 618–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibaek S, Jensen R, Klarskov P, Iversen HK, Gard G. The Danish Prostatic Symptom Score (DAN-PSS-1) questionnaire is reliable in stroke patients. Neurourol Urodyn 2006; 25: 319–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. WHO Task Force on Stroke and other cerebrovascular Disorders. Stroke-1989: recommendation on stroke prevention, diagnosis and therapy. Stroke 1989;20:1407–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J 1965; 14: 61–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collen FM, Wade DT, Bradshaw CM. Mobility after stroke: reliability of measures of impairment and disability. Int Disabil Stud 1990; 21: 247–51
   Google Scholar
• Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability?. Int Disabil Stud 1988; 10: 64–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blanke DJ, Hageman PA. Comparison of gait of young men and elderly men. Phys Ther 1989; 69: 144–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR. Gait assessment for neurologically impaired patients. Standards for outcome assessment. Phys Ther 1986; 66: 1530–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfson L, Whipple R, Amerman P, Tobin JN. Gait assessment in the elderly: a gait abnormality rating scale and its relation to falls. J Gerontol 1990; 45: M12–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perry J, Garrett M, Gronley JK, Mulroy SJ. Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. Stroke 1995; 26: 982–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searby L, Torrence G. Reliability of physiotherapy functional assessment used in a rehabilitation setting. Physiother Can 1989; 41: 261–71
   Google Scholar
• Meyhoff HH, Hald T, Nordling J, Andersen JA, Bilde T, Walter S. A new patient weighted symptom score (DAN-PSS-1). Clinical assessment of indications and outcomes of transurethral prostatectomy for uncomplicated benign prostatic hyperplasia. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1993; 27: 493–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen BJ, Flyger H, Brasso K, Schou J, Nordling J, Andersen JT, et al. Validation of the self-administrated Danish Prostatic Symptom Score (DAN-PSS-1) system for use in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Br J Urol 1995; 65: 451–8
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. A language and environment for statistical computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Efron B. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Statist 1979; 7: 1–26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood SN. Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL 2006
   Google Scholar
• Brown J, Seeley D, Fong J, Black D, Ensrud K, Grady D. Urinary incontinence in old women: who is at risk? Study of osteoporotic fractures research group. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87: 715–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brittain KR, Peet SM, Potter JF, Castleden CM. Prevalence and management of urinary incontinence in stroke survivors. Age Ageing 1999; 28: 509–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danforth KN, Shah AD, Townsend MK, Lifford KL, Curhan GC, Resnick NM, et al. Physical activity and urinary incontinence among healthy, older women. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 721–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar