Comparison of oncological and functional outcomes of pure versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy performed by a single surgeon

References

• Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology 1997;50:854–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhayani SB, Pavlovich CP, Hsu TS, Sullivan W, Su LM. Prospective comparison of short-term convalescence: laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2003;61:612–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris experience. J Urol 2000;163:418–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassweiler J, Seemann O, Schulze M, Teber D, Hatzinger M, Frede T. Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. J Urol 2003;169:1689–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbou CC, Hoznek A, Salomon L, Lobontiu A, Saint F, Cicco A, Remote laparoscopic radical prostatectomy carried out with a robot. Report of a case. Prog Urol 2000;10:520–3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patel VR, Coelho RF, Palmer KJ, Rocco B. Periurethral suspension stitch during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the technique and continence outcomes. Eur Urol 2009;56:472–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocco B, Gregori A, Stener S, Santoro L, Bozzola A, Galli S, Posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter allows a rapid recovery of continence after transperitoneal videolaparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2007;51:996–1003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cookson MS, Aus G, Burnett AL, Canby-Hagino ED, D'Amico AV, Dmochowski RR, Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer Update Panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes. J Urol 2007;177:540–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frota R, Turna B, Barros R, Gill IS. Comparison of radical prostatectomy techniques: open, laparoscopic and robotic assisted. Int Braz J Urol 2008;34:259–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstein J, Eckersberger E, Sadri H, Taneja SS, Lepor H, Djavan B. Open versus laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: the European and US experience. Rev Urol 2010;12:35–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Artibani W, Grosso G, Novara G, Pecoraro G, Sidoti O, Sarti A, Is laparoscopic radical prostatectomy better than traditional retropubic radical prostatectomy? An analysis of peri-operative morbidity in two contemporary series in Italy. Eur Urol 2003;44:401–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guazzoni G, Cestari A, Naspro R, Riva M, Centemero A, Zanoni M, Intra- and peri-operative outcomes comparing radical retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results from a prospective, randomized, single-surgeon study. Eur Urol 2006;50:98–104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grossi FS, Di Lena S, Barnaba D, Larocca L, Raguso M, Sallustio G, Laparoscopic versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: a case–control study at a single institution. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2010;82:109–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schroeck FR, Sun L, Freedland SJ, Albala DM, Mouraviev V, Polascik TJ, Comparison of prostate-specific antigen recurrence-free survival in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing either radical retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2008;102:28–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barocas DA, Salem S, Kordan Y, Herrell SD, Chang SS, Clark PE, Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival. J Urol 2010;183:990–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph JV, Vicente I, Madeb R, Erturk E, Patel HRH. Robot-assisted vs pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: are there any differences? BJU Int 2005;96:39–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rozet F, Jaffe J, Braud G, Harmon J, Cathelineau X, Barret E, A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience. J Urol 2007;178:478–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hakimi AA, Blitstein J, Feder M, Shapiro E, Ghavamian R. Direct comparison of surgical and functional outcomes of robotic-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: single-surgeon experience. Urology 2009;73:119–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trabulsi EJ, Zola JC, Gomella LG, Lallas CD. Transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon institutional evolution. Urol Oncol 2010;28:81–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Treiyer A, Anheuser P, Bütow Z, Steffens J. A single center prospective study: prediction of postoperative general quality of life, potency and continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 2011;185:1681–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coelho RF, Rocco B, Patel MB, Orvieto MA, Chauhan S, Ficarra V, Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers. J Endourol 2010;24:2003–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden CG, Arora A, Hutton A. Cancer control, continence, and potency after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy beyond the learning and discovery curves. J Endourol 2011;25:815–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• El-Hakim A, Leung RA, Tewari A. Robotic prostatectomy: a pooled analysis of published literature. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2006;6:11–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldini G, Bagry H, Aprikian A, Carli F. Postoperative urinary retention: anesthetic and perioperative considerations. Anesthesiology 2009;110:1139–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar