Factors contributing to enrollment in a family treatment court

REFERENCES

• Huddleston CW, Marlowe DB, Casebolt R. Painting the picture: A National report card on drug courts and other problem-solving court programs in the United States. Bureau of Justice Assistance, National Drug Court Institute, Vol II, No. 1, 2008. Available at http://www.ndci.org/sites/default/files/ndci/PCPII1_web%5B1%5D.pdf. Last accessed on January 10, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper CS. Drug Courts: Current issues and future perspectives. Subst Use Misuse 2003; 38(11–13):1671–1711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project. Looking at a Decade of Drug Courts. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison LD, Scarpitti F. Introduction: Progress and issues in drug treatment courts. Subst Use Misuse 2002; 37(12 & 13):1441–1467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galloway AL, Drapela LA. Considering their impact on recidivism among a nonmetropolitan adult sample in Washington State. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 2006; 50(3):280–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government Accountability Office (United States GAO). Adult Drug Courts: Evidence Indicates Recidivism Reductions and Mixed Results for Other Outcomes. (No. GAO-05-219). Washington, DC: GAO, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Belenko S. The challenges of conducting research in drug treatment court settings. Subst Use Misuse 2002; 37(12, 13):1635–1664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worcel S, Furrer C, Green BL, Rhodes B. Family Treatment Drug Court Evaluation Final Phase I Study Report. Portland, OR: NPC Research, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Washousky R, Pirowski H. Erie County Family Treatment Court Evaluation. Erie Community College: Department of Alcohol and Substance Abuse, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Ashford J. Treating substance-abusing parents: A study of the Pima County family drug court approach. Juv Fam Court J 2004; 55(4):27–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boles S, Young NK. Sacramento County Dependency Drug Court: Year Three Summary Report. Irvine, CA: Sacramento County Juvenile Drug Court Committee: Children and Family Futures, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Brisbane F, Marmo R, Cohen S, Nichol P, Finch J, Golbin J, Vidal C, McKay A, Graziano F. Evaluation of the Suffolk County Family Treatment Court. Stony Brook, NY: Child Welfare Training Program, SUNY Stony Brook School of Social Welfare, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Cannavo JM. Evaluation of the Erie County Family Treatment Court. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanit Soc Sci 2008; 68(9-A):4068.
   Google Scholar
• Green BL, Furrer C, Worcel S, Burrus S, Finigan MW. How effective are family treatment drug courts? Outcomes from a four-site national study. Child Maltreat 2007; 12(1):43–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haack M, Alemi F, Nemes S, Cohen JB. Experience with family drug courts in three cities. Subst Abuse 2004; 25(4):17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Innovation Research & Training, Inc. Durham Family Treatment Court Process Evaluation Report. Durham, NC, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• McMillian HE. Process and outcome evaluation of the Spokane County Meth Family Treatment Court, 2003–2005. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A. Humanit Soc Sci 2008; 69(2-A):767.
   Google Scholar
• McConnaughy EA, Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. Stages of change in psychotherapy: Measurement and sample profiles. Psychother Theory Res Pract 1983; 20:368–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing JA. Detecting alcoholism: The CAGE questionnaire. JAMA 1984; 252(14):1905–1907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rounsaville BJ, Carroll KM, Onken LS. A stage model of behavioral therapies research: Getting started and moving on from Stage I. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 2001; 8:133–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzel JA, Nochajski TH, Coffey SF, Farrell MG. Mental health among suburban drug court participants. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2007; 33(3):475–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannenberg AFI, Ratt H, Plomp HN. Demand for alcohol treatment by problem drinkers. J Subst Abuse Treat 1992; 9:59–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyer J, Coder B, Bischof G, Baumeister DE, Rumpf H, John U, Hapke U. Intention to utilize formal help in a sample with alcohol problems: A prospective study. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007; 87:210–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hingson R, Mangione T, Meyers A, Scotch N. Seeking help for drinking problems: A study in the Boston metropolitan area. J Stud Alcohol 1982; 43:273–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisner C, Matzger H. A prospective study of the factors influencing entry to alcohol and drug treatment. J Behav Health Serv Res 2002; 29:126–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisner C, Matzger H, Tam T, Schmidt L. Who goes to alcohol and drug treatment? Understanding utilization within the context of insurance. J Stud Alcohol 2002; 63:673–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieczorek WF, Nochajski TH. Characteristics of persistent drinking drivers: Comparisons of first, second and multiple offenders. In Contemporary Issues in Traffic Research and Road User Safety. Hennessey DA, Wiesenthal DA, eds. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science, 2005.
   Google Scholar