Magnitude Changes in Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and High-level 2f₁-f₂ Distortion Products in Man During Quinine Administration

References

• Allen J B, Fahey P F. Using acoustic distortion products to measure the cochlear amplifier gain on the basilar membrane. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 92: 178–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alván G, Karlsson K K, Hellgren U, Villén T. Hearing impairment related to quinine plasma concentration in healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmac 1991; 31: 409–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brass D, Kemp D T. Time-domain observations of otoacoustic emissions during constant tone stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90: 2415–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brass D, Kemp D T. Analyses of Mössbauer mechanical measurements indicate that the cochlea is mechanically active. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 93: 1502–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown A M, Kemp D T. Suppressibility of the 2f1-f2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man. Hear Res 1984; 13: 29–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown A M, McDowell B, Forge A. Acoustic distortion products can be used to monitor the effects of chronic gentamicin treatment. Hear Res 1989; 42: 143–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson Ö, Fridén M, Hellgren U, Gustafsson L L. Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography determination of quinine in plasma, whole blood, urine and samples dried on filter paper. Ther DrugMonit 1993; 15: 334–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaskill S A, Brown A M. The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2f1-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88: 821–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris F P, Probst R. Reporting click-evoked and distortion-product otoacoustic emission results with respect to the pure-tone audiogram. Ear Hear 1991; 12: 399–405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson K K, Flock Å. Quinine causes isolated outer hair cells to change length. Neurosci Lett 1990; 116: 101–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson K K, Berninger E, Alván G. The effect of quinine on psychoacoustic tuning curves, stapedius reflexes and evoked otoacoustic emissions in healthy volunteers. Scand Audiol 1991; 20: 83–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson K K, Berninger E, Gustafsson L L, Alván G. Pronounced quinine-induced cochlear hearing loss. A mechanistic study in one volunteer at multiple stable plasma concentrations. Audiol Med, (in press)
   Google Scholar
• Kemp D T. Otoacoustic emissions, travelling waves and cochlear mechanisms. Hear Res 1986; 22: 95–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp D T, Bray P, Alexander L, Brown A M. Acoustic emission cochleography—practical aspects. Scand Audiol 1986; 15(Suppl 25)71–95
   Google Scholar
• Kemp D T, Ryan S, Bray P. A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 93–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin B L, Martin G K, Probst R, Coats A C. Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal: I. Basic features and vulnerability. Hear Res 1987; 28: 173–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin B L, Harris F P, Stagner B B, Hawkins M D, Martin G K. Distortion product emissions in humans: I. Basic properties in normally hearing subjects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99: 3–14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin G K, Ohlms L A, Franklin D J, Harris F P, Lonsbury-Martin B L. Distortion product emissions in humans: III. Influence of sensorineural hearing loss. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99: 30–42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen L H, Popelka G R, Rasmussen A N, Osterhammel P A. Clinical significance of probe-tone frequency ratio of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Scand Audiol 1993; 22: 159–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paintaud G, Alván G, Berninger E, Gustafsson L, Idrizbegovic E, Karlsson K, Wakelkamp M. The concentration-effect relationship of quinine-induced hearing impairment. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1994; 55: 317–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin B L, Martin G K. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 89: 2027–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen A N, Popelka G R, Osterhammel P A, Nielsen L H. Clinical significance of relative probe-tone levels on distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Scand Audiol 1993; 22: 223–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smurzynski J, Kim D O. Distortion-product and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions of normally-hearing adults. Hear Res 1992; 58: 227–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead M L, Lonsbury-Martin B L, Martin G K. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit: I. Differential dependence on stimulus parameters. J Acoust Soc Am 1992a; 91: 1587–1607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead M L, Lonsbury-Martin B L, Martin G K. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit: II. Differential physiological vulnerability. J Acoust Soc Am 1992b; 92: 2662–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar