References
- Arreola RA. Developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation system: a handbook for college faculty and administrators on designing and operating a comprehensive faculty evaluation system, 2nd. Anker Publishing, Bolton 2000
- Beran T, Violato C. Ratings of university teacher instruction: How much do student and course characteristics really matter?. Assess Eval Higher Educ 2005; 30: 593–601
- Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences, 2nd. Erlbaum, Hillsdale 1988
- Cohen PA. Student ratings of instruction and student achievement: A meta-analysis of multisection validity studies. Rev Educ Res 1981; 51: 281–309
- D’appollonia S, Abrami PC. Navigating student ratings of instruction. Am Psychol 1997; 52: 1198–1208
- Dowell DA, Neal JA. A selective review of the validity of student ratings of teaching. J Higher Educ 1982; 53: 51–62
- Greenwald AG. Validity concerns and usefulness of student ratings of instruction. Am Psychol 1997; 52: 1182–1186
- Greenwald AG, Gillmore GM. No pain, no gain? The importance of measuring course workload in student ratings of instruction. J Educ Psychol 1997; 89: 743–751
- Greenwald AJ. Constructs in student ratings of instructors. The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement, HI Braun, DN Jackson. Erlbaum, New York 2002; 277–297
- Kulik JA. Student ratings: Validity, utility, and controversy. New Dir Institutional Res 2001; 109: 9–25
- Marsh HW. Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues and directions for future research. Int J Educ Res 1987; 11: 253–388
- Marsh HW, Dunkin M. Students’ evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. Higher education: Handbook on theory and research. Agathon, New York 1992; 8: 143–233
- Marsh HW, Roche L. The use of students’ evaluations and an individually structured intervention to enhance university teaching effectiveness. Am Educ Res J 1993; 30: 217–251
- Marsh HW, Roche LA. Making students evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility. Am Psychol 1997; 52: 1187–1197
- Marsh HW, Roche LA. Effects of grading leniency and low workload on students’ evaluations of teaching: Popular myth, bias, validity, or innocent bystanders?. J Educ Psychol 2000; 92: 202–228
- Mckeachie WJ. Student ratings: The validity of use. Am Psychol 1997; 52: 1218–1225
- Olivares OJ. Student interest, grading leniency, and teacher ratings: A conceptual analysis. Contemp Educ Psychol 2001; 26: 382–399
- Theall M, Franklin J. Looking for bias in all the wrong places: A search for truth or a witch hunt in student ratings of instruction?. New Dir Institutional Res 2001; 109: 45–56