537
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Medical students’ clinical performance in general practice – Triangulating assessments from patients, teachers and students

Pages 333-339 | Published online: 30 Mar 2010

References

  • Arnold L, Willoughby TL, Calkins EV. Self-evaluation in undergraduate medical education: A longitudinal perspective. J Med Educ 1985; 60: 21–28
  • Benson J, Quince T, Hibble A, Fanshawe T, Emery J. Impact on patients of expanded, general practice based, student teaching: Observational and qualitative study. BMJ 2005; 331: 89
  • Black AE, Church M. Assessing medical student effectiveness from the psychiatric patient's perspective: The medical student interviewing performance questionnaire. Med Educ 1998; 32: 472–478
  • Bowen JL, Irby DM. Assessing quality and costs of education in the ambulatory setting: A review of the literature. Acad Med 2002; 77: 621–680
  • Braend AM, Gran SF, Lindbaek M. Patients – A useful resource when evaluating medical students’ clinical practice?. Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening 2006; 126: 2122–2125
  • Carline JD, Paauw DS, Thiede KW, Ramsey PG. Factors affecting the reliability of ratings of students’ clinical skills in a medicine clerkship. J Gen Intern Med 1992; 7: 506–510
  • Carney PA, Pipas CF, Eliassen MS, Mengshol SC, Fall LH, Schifferdecker KE, Olson AL, Peltier DA, Nierenberg DW. An analysis of students’ clinical experiences in an integrated primary care clerkship. Acad Med 2002; 77: 681–687
  • Elnicki DM, Kolarik R, Bardella I. Third-year medical students’ perceptions of effective teaching behaviors in a multidisciplinary ambulatory clerkship. Acad Med 2003; 78: 815–819
  • Evans RG, Edwards A, Evans S, Elwyn B, Elwyn G. Assessing the practising physician using patient surveys: A systematic review of instruments and feedback methods. Fam Pract 2007; 24: 117–127
  • Gran SF, Braend AM, Lindbaek M. Clerkship in general practice – Organized for learning?. Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening 2008; 128: 2443–2445
  • Gribble RK, Haupt C. Quantitative and qualitative differences between handout and mailed patient satisfaction surveys. Med Care 2005; 43: 276–281
  • Grol R, Wensing M, for the EUROPEP Group, 2000a. Patients evaluate general/family practice: The EUROPEP instrument. Nijmegen: World Organisation of Family Doctors (WONCA)/European Association for Quality in Family Practice
  • Grol R, Wensing M, Mainz J, Jung HP, Ferreira P, Hearnshaw H, Hjortdahl P, Olesen F, Reis S, Ribacke M, et al. Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: An international comparison. Br J Gen Pract 2000b; 50: 882–887
  • Hastings A, Mckinley RK, Fraser RC. Strengths and weaknesses in the consultation skills of senior medical students: Identification, enhancement and curricular change. Med Educ 2006; 40: 437–443
  • Henkin Y, Friedman M, Bouskila D, Kushnir D, Glick S. The use of patients as student evaluators. Med Teach 1990; 12: 279–289
  • Jones R. Oxford textbook of primary medical care. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2004
  • Kassebaum DG, Eaglen RH. Shortcomings in the evaluation of students' clinical skills and behaviors in medical school. Acad Med 1999; 74: 842–849
  • Langendyk V. Not knowing that they do not know: Self-assessment accuracy of third-year medical students. Med Educ 2006; 40: 173–179
  • Lockyer J. Multisource feedback in the assessment of physician competencies. JCEHP 2003; 23: 4–12
  • Moorhead R, Maguire P, Thoo SL. Giving feedback to learners in the practice. Aust Fam Physician 2004; 33: 691–695
  • Norcini J, Burch V. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE guide no. 31. Med Teach 2007; 29: 855–871
  • Norwegian Centre for Informatics in Health and Social Care. Available from: http://www.kith.no/templates/kith_WebPage____1062.aspx
  • Papinczak T, Young L, Groves M, Haynes M. An analysis of peer, self, and tutor assessment in problem-based learning tutorials. Med Teach 2007; 29: e122–e132
  • Salerno SM, Jackson JL, O'Malley PG. Interactive faculty development seminars improve the quality of written feedback in ambulatory teaching. J Gen Intern Med 2003; 18: 831–834
  • Sargeant J, Mann K, Ferrier S. Exploring family physicians’ reactions to multisource feedback: Perceptions of credibility and usefulness. Med Educ 2005; 39: 497–504
  • Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, Van Der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. Challenges in multisource feedback: Intended and unintended outcomes. Med Educ 2007; 41: 583–591
  • Vingerhoets E, Wensing M, Grol R. Feedback of patients’ evaluations of general practice care: A randomised trial. Qual. Health Care 2001; 10: 224–228
  • Wilkinson TJ, Fontaine S. Patients’ global ratings of student competence. Unreliable contamination or gold standard? Med Educ 2002; 36: 1117–1121
  • Wood L, Hassell A, Whitehouse A, Bullock A, Wall D. A literature review of multi-source feedback systems within and without health services, leading to 10 tips for their successful design. Med Teach 2006; 28: e185–e191
  • Woolliscroft JO, Tenhaken J, Smith J, Calhoun JG. Medical students’ clinical self-assessments: Comparisons with external measures of performance and the students’ self-assessments of overall performance and effort. Acad Med 1993; 68: 285–294

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.