A remedial intervention linked to a formative assessment is effective in terms of improving student performance in subsequent degree examinations

References

• Bligh J, Brice J. What is the value of good medical education research?. Med Educ 2008; 42: 652–653
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Challis M, Fleet A, Batstone G. An accident waiting to happen? A case for medical education. Med Teach 1999; 21: 582–585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland J, Arnold R, Chesser A. Failing finals is often a surprise for the student but not the teacher: Identifying difficulties and supporting students with academic difficulties. Med Teach 2005; 27: 504–508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland JA, Milne A, Sinclair HK, Lee AJ. Predicting performance cohort study: Is performance on early MBChB assessments predictive of later undergraduate grades?. Med Educ 2008a; 42: 676–683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland JA, Knight L, Rees C, Tracey S, Bond CM. ‘Is it me or is it them?’ Factors influencing assessors’ failure to fail underperforming medical students. Med Educ 2008b; 42: 800–809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland JA, Milne, A, Sinclair, HK, Lee, AJ. 2009. An intercalated BSc degree is associated with higher marks on subsequent undergraduate medical degree exams. BMC 9:24 (19 May)
   Google Scholar
• Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. 2008. BMJ 337: a1655.
   Google Scholar
• Denison AR, Curry AE, Laing MR, Heys SD. Good for them or good for us? The role of academic guidance interviews. Med Educ 2006; 40: 1188–1191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudek NL, Marks MB, Regehr G. Failure to fail: The perspectives of clinical supervisors. Acad Med 2005; 80: S84–S87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eva K. Broadening the debate about quality in medical education. Med Educ 2009; 43: 294–296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson E, James D, Madeley L. Factors associated with success in medical school: Systematic review of the literature. BMJ 2002; 324: 952–957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrest L, Elman N, Gizara S, Tammi Vacha-Haase T. Trainee impairment: A review of identification, remediation, dismissal, and legal issues. Couns Psychol 1999; 27: 627–686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frellsen SL, Baker EA, Papp KK, Durning SJ. Medical school policies regarding struggling medical students during the internal medicine clerkships: Results of a national survey. Acad Med 2008; 83: 876–881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamby H, Prasad K, Anderson MB, Scherpbier A, Williams R, Zwierstra E, Cuddihy HHH. BEME systematic review: Predictive values of measurements obtained in medical schools and future performance in medical practice. Med Teach 2006; 28: 103–116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harden RM, Gleeson FA. Assessment of clinical competence using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Med Educ 1979; 13: 41–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauer KE, Teherani A, Irby DM, Kerr KM, O’Sullivan PS. Approaches to medical student remediation after a comprehensive clinical skills examination. Med Educ 2008; 42: 104–112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langendyk V. Not knowing what they do not know: Self-assessment accuracy of third-year medical students. Med Educ 2006; 40: 173–179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavin B, Pangaro L. Internship ratings as a validity outcome measure for an evaluation system to identify inadequate clerkship performance. Acad Med 1998; 73: 998–1002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumb AB, Vail A. Comparison of academic, application form and social factors in predicting early performance on the medical course. Med Educ 2004; 38: 1002–1005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin IJ, Jolly B. Predictive validity and estimated cut score of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) used as an assessment of clinical skills at the end of the first clinical year. Med Educ 2002; 36: 418–425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus IC, Richards P, Winder BC. Intercalated degrees, learning styles, and career preferences: Prospective, longitudinal study of UK medical students. BMJ 1999; 319: 542–546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newble D. Techniques for measuring clinical competence: Objective structured clinical examinations. Med Educ 2004; 38: 199–203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer MM, De Saintonge M, Evans D, Wood D. Support for students with academic difficulties. Med Educ 2002; 36: 643–650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair HK, Cleland J. Medical undergraduate students – who seeks formative feedback?. Med Educ 2007; 41: 580–582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speer AJ, Solomon DJ, Fincher RM. Grade inflation in internal medicine clerkships: Results of a national survey. Teach Learn Med 2000; 12: 112–116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan M, Hauer KE, Der-Martirosian C, Wilkes M, Gesundheit C. Does feedback matter? Practice-based learning for medical students after a multi-institutional clinical performance examination. Med Educ 2007; 41: 857–865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tooth D, Tonge K, McManus IC. Anxiety and study methods in preclinical students: Causal relation to academic performance. Med Educ 1989; 23: 416–421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson TJ, Wells JE, Bushnell JA. Are differences between graduates and undergraduates in a medical course due to age or prior degree?. Med Educ 2004; 38: 1141–1146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolf K, McManus IC, Potts HWW, Dacre J, 2009. Ethnic differences on psychological and demographic factors – can they explain the academic underperformance of medical students from ethnic minorities? Conference presentation, The Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE) Malaga, Spain, 29 August–2 August 2009
   Google Scholar
• Yates J, James D. Risk factors for poor performance on the undergraduate medical course: Cohort study at Nottingham University. Med Educ 2007; 41: 65–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar