Providing feedback: Exploring a model (emotion, content, outcomes) for facilitating multisource feedback

References

• Allerup P, Aspegren K, Ejlersen E, Jorgensen G, Malchow-Moller A, Moller MK, Pedersen KK, Rasmussen OB, Rohold A, Sorensen B. Use of 360-degree assessment of residents in internal medicine in a Danish setting: A feasibility study. Med Teach 2007; 29(2–3)166–170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer JC. State of the science in health professional education: Effective feedback. Med Educ 2010; 44(1)101–108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold L, Shue CK, Kritt B, Ginsburg S, Stern DT. Medical students’ views on peer assessment of professionalism. J Gen Intern Med 2005; 20(9)819–824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atwater LE, Waldman DA, Atwater D, Cartier P. An upward feedback field experiment: Supervisors’ cynicism, reactions, and commitment to subordinates. Person Psychol 2000; 53(2)275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1986
   Google Scholar
• Bing-You RG, Trowbridge RL. Why medical educators may be failing at feedback. JAMA 2009; 302: 1330–1331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brett JF, Atwater LE. 360° feedback: Accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness. J Appl Psychol 2001; 86(5)930–942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce D, Sargeant J. Background and evidence for use of MSF. General practice specialty training: Making it happen, K Mohanna, A Tavabie. Royal College of General Practitioners, London 2008; 125–134
   Google Scholar
• Bullock AD, Hassell A, Markham WA, Wall DW, Whitehouse AW. How ratings vary by staff group in multi-source feedback assessment of junior doctors. Med Educ 2009; 43(6)516–520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies H, Archer J, Bateman A, Dewar S, Crossley J, Grant J, Southgate L. Specialty-specific multi-source feedback: Assuring validity, informing training. Med Educ 2008; 42(10)1014–1020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeNisi AS, Kluger AN. Feedback effectiveness: Can 360-degree appraisals be improved?. Acad Manage Exec 2000; 14(1)129–139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freidson E. Professionalism reborn: Theory, prophecy, and policy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL 1994
   Google Scholar
• Goodstone MS, Diamante T. Organizational use of therapeutic change strengthening multisource feedback systems through interdisciplinary coaching. Consult Psychol J Pract Res 1998; 50(3)152–163
   Google Scholar
• Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res 2007; 77(1)81–112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy T, Regehr G, Baker GR, Lingard L. Preserving professional credibility: Grounded theory study of medical trainees' request for clinical support. BMJ 2009; 338: b128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluger AN, DeNisi A. Effects of feedback intervention on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull 1996; 119(2)254–284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger J, Dunning D. Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J Pers Soc Psychol 1999; 77(6)1121–1134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liamputtong Rice P, Ezzy D. Qualitative research methods: A health focus. Masako Ono-Kihara, Japan 2007
   Google Scholar
• Lockyer JM, Violato C, Fidler HM. What multisource feedback factors influence physician self-assessments? A five-year longitudinal study. Acad Med 2007; 82(Suppl. 10)S77–S80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luthans F, Peterson S. 360-degree feedback with systematic coaching: Empirical analysis suggests a winning combination. Hum Resour Manage 2003; 42(3)243–256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman M. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 1994
   Google Scholar
• Murphy DJ, Bruce DA, Mercer SW, Eva KW. The reliability of workplace-based assessment in postgraduate medical education and training: A national evaluation in general practice in the United Kingdom. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2009; 14(2)219–232, Epub 2008 Feb 28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overeem K, Wollersheim H, Driessen E, Lombarts K, van de Ven G, Grol R, Arah O. Doctors’ perceptions of why 360-degree feedback does (not) work: A qualitative study. Med Educ 2009; 43(9)874–882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norcini J, Burch V. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31. Med Teach 2007; 29(9)855–871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie J, Spencer L, O’Connor W. Carrying out qualitative analysis. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers, J Ritchie, J Lewis. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 2003; 219–263
   Google Scholar
• Rogers C. Freedom to learn: Studies of the person. Charles E. Marrill Publishing Company, Columbus, OH 1969
   Google Scholar
• Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, Van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. 2009. Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use. Adv Health Sci Educ 14:399–410
   Google Scholar
• Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. Challenges in multisource feedback: Intended and unintended outcomes. Med Educ 2007; 41(6)583–591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secretary of State for Health 2007. Trust, assurance and safety: The regulation of health professionals in the 21st century. Cm 7013.
   Google Scholar
• Shute VJ. Focus on formative feedback. Rev Educ Res 2008; 78(1)153–189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teunissen PW, Boor K, Scherpbier AJ, van der Vleuten CP, van Diemen-Steenvoorde JA, van Luijk SJ, Scheele F. Attending doctors’ perspectives on how residents learn. Med Educ 2007; 41(11)1050–1058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood L, Hassell A, Whitehouse A, Bullock A, Wall D. A literature review of multi-source feedback systems within and without health services, leading to 10 tips for their successful design. Med Teach 2006; 28(7)e185–191
   PubMedGoogle Scholar