Structured feedback to undergraduate medical students: 3 years’ experience of an assessment tool

References

• Archer JC. State of the science in health professional education: Effective feedback. Med Educ 2010; 44: 101–108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braend AM, Frandsen Gran S, Frich JC, Lindbaek M. Medical students’ clinical performance in general practice: Triangulating assessments from patients, teachers and students. Med Teach 2010; 32: 333–339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burch VC, Seggie JL, Gary NE. Formative assessment promotes learning in undergraduate clinical clerkships. S Afr Med J 2006; 96: 430–433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantillon P, Sargeant J. Giving feedback in clinical settings. BMJ 2008; 337: 1292–1294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney PA, Dietrich AJ, Eliassen S, Pipas C, Donahue D. Differences in ambulatory teaching and learning by gender match of preceptors and students. Fam Med 2000; 32: 618–623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colthart I, Bagnall G, Evans A, Allbutt H, Haig A, Illing J, McKinstry B. The effectiveness of self-assessment on the identification of learner needs, learner activity, and impact on clinical practice: BEME Guide no. 10. Med Teach 2008; 30: 124–145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crabtree BF, Miller WL, editors. Doing qualitative research. Sage Publishing, Thousand Oaks, CA 1999
   Google Scholar
• Daelmans HEM, Hoogenboom RJI, Donker AJM, Scherpbier AJJA, Stehouwer CDA, van der Vleuten CPM. Effectiveness of clinical rotations as a learning environment for achieving competences. Med Teach 2004; 26: 305–312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daelmans HEM, Overmeer RM, van der Hem-Stokroos HH, Scherpbier AJJA, Stehouwer CDA, van der Vleuten CPM. In-training assessment: Qualitative study of effects on supervision and feedback in an undergraduate clinical rotation. Med Educ 2006; 40: 51–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgren G, Haffling AC, Jakobsson U, McAleer S, Danielsen N. Comparing the educational environment (as measured by DREEM) at two different stages of curriculum reform. Med Teach 2010; 32: e233–e238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA 1983; 250: 777–781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eva KW, Regehr G. Self assessment in the health professions: A reformulation and research agenda. Acad Med 2005; 80: S46–S54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernando N, Cleland J, McKenzie H, Cassar K. Identifying the factors that determine feedback given to undergraduate medical students following formative mini-CEX assessments. Med Educ 2008; 42: 89–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haffling AC, Beckman A, Pahlmblad A, Edgren G. Students’ reflections in a portfolio pilot: Highlighting professional issues. Med Teach 2010; 32: e532–e540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings AM, McKinley RK, Fraser RC. Strengths and weaknesses in the consultation skills of senior medical students: Identification, enhancement and curricular change. Med Educ 2006; 40: 437–443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res 2007; 77: 81–112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewson MG, Little ML. Giving feedback in medical education. J Gen Intern Med 1998; 13: 111–116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmboe ES, Yepes M, Williams F, Huot SJ. Feedback and the mini clinical evaluation exercise. J Gen Intern Med 2004; 19: 558–561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howley LD, Wilson WG. Direct observation of students during clerkship rotations: A multiyear descriptive study. Acad Med 2004; 79: 276–280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogan JR, Hauer KE. Brief report: Use of the mini-clinical evaluation exercise in internal medicine core clerkships. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21: 501–502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogan JR, Holmboe ES, Hauer KE. Tools for direct observation and assessment of clinical skills of medical trainees. A systematic review. JAMA 2009; 302: 1316–1326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogan JR, Shea JA. Implementing feedback cards in core clerkships. Med Educ 2008; 42: 1071–1079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane JL, Gottlieb RP. Structured clinical observations: A method to teach clinical skills with limited time and financial resources. Pediatrics 2000; 105: 973–977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas C, Snijders TAB. The multi-level approach to repeated measures for complete and incomplete data. Qual Quantity 2003; 37: 71–89
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinley RK, Fraser RC, van der Vleuten C, Hastings AM. Formative assessment of the consultation performance of medical students in the setting of general practice using a modified version of the leicester assessment package. Med Educ 2000; 34: 573–579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norcini J, Burch V. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31. Med Teach 2007; 29: 855–871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paukert JL, Richards ML, Olney C. An encounter card system for increasing feedback to students. Am J Surg 2002; 183: 300–304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulito AR, Donelly MB, Plymale M, Mentzer RM. What do faculty observe of medical students’ clinical performance?. Teach Learn Med 2006; 18: 99–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasbash J, Charlton C, Browne WJ, Healy M, Cameron B, 2009. MlWin, Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol
   Google Scholar
• Russell G. Taking time to watch. Observation and learning in family practice. Can Fam Physician 2009; 55: 948–950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant J, Armson H, Chesluk B, Dornan T, Eva K, Holmboe E, Lockyer J, Loney E, Mann K, van der Vleuten C. The processes and dimensions of informed self-assessment: A conceptual model. Acad Med 2010; 85: 1212–1220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant JM, Mann KV, van der Vleuten CP, Metsemakers JF. Reflection: A link between receiving and using assessment feedback. Adv Health Sci Educ 2009; 14: 399–410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shumway JM, Harden RM. AMEE Guide No. 25: The assessment of learning outcomes for the competent and reflective physician. Med Teach 2003; 25: 569–584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Vleuten CPM. The assessment of professional competence: Developments, research and practical implications. Adv Health Sci Educ 1996; 1: 41–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT. Assessing professional competence: From methods to programmes. Med Educ 2005; 39: 309–317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar