General overview of the theories used in assessment: AMEE Guide No. 57

References

• Baartman LK, 2008. Assessing the assessment: Development and use of quality criteria for competence assessment programmes. Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht
   Google Scholar
• Berk RA. A consumers’ guide to criterion-referenced test reliability. J Educ Meas 1980; 17: 323–349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berner ES, Hamilton LA, Best WR. A new approach to evaluating problem-solving in medical students. J Med Educ 1974; 49: 666–672
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bordage G, 1987.An alternative approach to PMP's: The ‘key-features’ concept. In: Hart IR, Harden R, editors. Further developments in assessing clinical competence, proceedings of the second Ottawa conference. Montreal: Can-Heal Publications Inc. pp 59–75
   Google Scholar
• Case SM, Swanson DB. Extended-matching items: A practical alternative to free response questions. Teach Learn Med 1993; 5: 107–115
   Google Scholar
• Charlin B, Roy L, Brailovsky C, Goulet F, van der Vleuten C. The script concordance test: A tool to assess the reflective clinician. Teach Learn Med 2000; 12: 185–91
   Google Scholar
• Chase WG, Simon HA. Perception in chess. Cognit Psychol 1973; 4: 55–81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi MTH, Glaser R, Rees E. Expertise in problem solving. Advances in the psychology of human intelligence, RJ Sternberg. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale NJ 1982; 1: 1–75
   Google Scholar
• Cilliers FJ, Schuwirth LWT, Adendorff HJ, Herman N, van der Vleuten CPM. The mechanisms of impact of summative assessment on medical students’ learning. Adv Health Sci Educ 2010; 15: 695–715
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cilliers FJ, Schuwirth LWT, Herman N, Adendorff HJ, van der Vleuten CPM. (2011). A model of the sources, consequences and mechanism of impact of summative assessment on how students learn. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-011-9292-5
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach LJ, Meehl PE. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull 1955; 52: 281–302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes RM, Faust D, Meehl PE. Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science 1989; 243: 1668–1674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groot AD. Thought and choice in chess. Mouton publishers, The Hague, The Netherlands 1978
   Google Scholar
• Dent JA, Harden RM, (eds.) 2009. A practical guide for medical teachers. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra J, Galbraith R, Hodges B, Mcavoy P, Mccrorie P, Southgate L, van der Vleuten CPM, VDV, Wass V, Schuwirth LWT. 2011. Development and validation of guidelines for designing programmes of assessment: A modified Delphi-study
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra J, van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT. A new framework for designing programmes of assessment. Adv Health Sci Educ 2009; 15: 379–393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elstein AS, Shulmann LS, Sprafka SA. Medical problem-solving: An analysis of clinical reasoning. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA 1978
   Google Scholar
• Eva KW. What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning. Med Educ 2004; 39: 98–106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eva KW, Neville AJ, Norman GR. Exploring the etiology of content specificity: Factors influencing analogic transfer and problem solving. Acad Med 1998; 73: S1–S5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederiksen N. The real test bias: Influences of testing on teaching and learning. Am Psychol 1984; 39: 193–202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakstian RA. The effects of type of examination anticipated on test preparation and performance. J Educ Res 1971; 64: 319–324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane MT. Current concerns in validity theory. J Educ Meas 2001; 38: 319–342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane MT. Validation. Educational measurement, RL Brennan. ACE/Praeger, Westport, CT 2006; 4: 17–64
   Google Scholar
• Klein G. Naturalistic decision making. Hum Factors 2008; 50: 456–460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen DP, Butler AC, Roediger HL. Test-enhanced learning in medical education. Med Educ 2008; 42: 959–966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marewski JN, Gaissmaier W, Gigerenzer G. Good judgements do not require complex cognition. Cogn Process 2009; 11: 103–121
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Newble D, Hoare J, Baxter A. Patient management problems, issues of validity. Med Educ 1982; 16: 137–142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman GR. Problem-solving skills, solving problems and problem-based learning. Med Educ 1988; 22: 270–286
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Page G, Bordage G. The medical council of Canada's key features project: A more valid written examination of clinical decision-making skills. Acad Med 1995; 70: 104–110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plous S. The psychology of judgment and decision making. McGraw-Hill Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1993
   Google Scholar
• Polsen P, Jeffries R. Expertise in problem solving. Advances in the psychology of human intelligence, RJ Sternberg. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale NJ 1982; 7–75
   Google Scholar
• Popham WJ, Husek TR. Implications of criterion-referenced measurement. J Educ Meas 1969; 6: 1–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prescott-Clements LE, van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT, Rennie JS. (submitted 2010). Investigating the reliability of observed workplace-based assessment in vivo
   Google Scholar
• Regehr G, Norman GR. Issues in cognitive psychology: Implications for professional education. Acad Med 1996; 71: 988–1001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt HG. Foundations of problem-based learning: Some explanatory notes. Med Educ 1993; 27: 422–432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt HG, Boshuizen HP. On acquiring expertise in medicine. Special issue: European educational psychology. Educ Psychol Rev 1993; 5: 205–221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt HG, Boshuizen HPA, Hobus PPM, Transitory stages in the development of medical expertise: The ‘intermediate effect’ in clinical case representation studies. In: Proceedings of the 10th annual conference of the cognitive science society, 1988 August 17–19, Montreal, Canada: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt HG, Norman GR, Boshuizen HPA. A cognitive perspective on medical expertise: Theory and implications. Acad Med 1990; 65: 611–622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scouller K. The influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches; multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. High Educ 1998; 35: 452–472
   Google Scholar
• Shepard L. The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educ Res 2009; 29: 4–14
   Google Scholar
• Stalenhoef-Halling BF, van der Vleuten CPM, Jaspers TAM, Fiolet JBFM. 1990. A new approach to assessing clinical problem-solving skills by written examination: Conceptual basis and initial pilot test results. In: Bender W, Hiemstra RJ, Scherpbier A, Zwierstra RJ, editors. Teaching and assessing clinical competence, proceedings of the fourth Ottawa conference. Groningen, The Netherlands: Boekwerk Publications. pp 552–557
   Google Scholar
• Swanson DB, Norcini JJ, Grosso LJ. Assessment of clinical competence: Written and computer-based simulations. Assess Eval High Educ 1987; 12: 220–246
   Google Scholar
• Van Merrienboer J, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educ Psychol Rev 2005; 17: 147–177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Merrienboer JJ, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory in health professional education: Design principles and strategies. Med Educ 2010; 44: 85–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar