References
- Alberta Physician Achievement Review 2009. Information about the PAR Program [Internet]. Edmonton: College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta. [Published 2009 June 1]. Available from: http://www.par-program.org/
- Bunton SA, Sabalis RF, Sabharwal RK, Candler C, Mallon WT. Medical school expansion: Challenges and strategies. American Association of Medical Colleges, Washington DC 2008
- Davies HA, Archer JC. Multi source feedback using Sheffield Peer Review Assessment Tool (SPRAT): Development and practical aspects. Clin Teach 2005; 2(2)77–81
- Edwards MR, Ewen AJ. 360 Feedback – The powerful new model for employee assessment & performance improvement. AMACOM, New York 1996
- Evans AW, Leeson RMA, Newton John TR, Petrie A. The influence of self-deception and impression management upon self-assessment in oral surgery. Br Dent J 2005; 198: 765–769
- Farmer EA, Beard JD, Dauphinee WD, LaDuca T, Mann KV. Assessing the performance of doctors in teams and systems. Med Educ 2002; 36: 942–948
- Fleenor JW, Taylor S, Chappelow C. Leveraging the impact of 360-degree feedback. Wiley, San Francisco, CA 2008
- Foy NF, Schlisselberg G. Using 360-degree performance assessment techniques in student evaluation (Report no NCRTL-TM034724). National Center for Research on Teacher Learning, East Lansing, MI 2002, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service no. ED473152), 2002
- Frank JR. The CanMEDS 2005 physician competency framework, Better standards. Better physicians. Better care. The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Ottawa 2005
- Gordon J. Assessing students’ personal and professional development using portfolios and interviews. Med Educ 2003; 37(4)335–340
- Hampton T. US medical school enrollment rising, but residency programs too limited. JAMA 2008; 299(24)2846
- Hesketh EA, Anderson F, Bagnall GM, Driver CP, Johnston DA, Marshall D, Needham G, Orr G, Walker K. Using a 360 degrees diagnostic screening tool to provide an evidence trail of junior doctor performance throughout their first postgraduate year. Med Teach 2005; 27(3)219–233
- Kaplan CB, Centor RM. The use of nurses to evaluate house officers’ humanistic behavior. J Gen Intern Med 1990; 5: 410–414
- Lockyer JM, Clyman SG. Multisource feedback (360-degree evaluation). Practical guide to the evaluation of clinical competence, ES Holmbie, RE Hawkings. Mosby Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA 2008; 75–85
- Pelling S, Kalen A, Hammar M, Wahlström O. Preparation for becoming members of health care teams: Findings from a 5-year evaluation of a student interprofessional training ward. J Interprof Care 2011; 25(5)328–332
- Rees C, Shepherd M. The acceptability of 360-degree judgments as a method of assessing undergraduate medical students’ personal and professional behaviours. Med Educ 2005; 39(1)49–57
- Ricketts C, Bligh J. Developing a “frequent look and rapid remediation” assessment system for a new medical school. Acad Med 2011; 86(1)67–71
- Risucci DA, Tortolani AJ, Ward RJ. Ratings of surgical residents by self, supervisors, and peers. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1989; 169(6)519–526
- Schell SR, Lind DS. An Internet-based tool for evaluating third-year medical student performance. Am J Surg 2003; 185(3)211–215
- The Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada 2010. Canadian Medical Education Statistics 32:11. Available from http://www.afmc.ca/pdf/Cmes_2010_Shrink.pdf
- Waldman D, Bowen D. The acceptability of 360° appraisals: A customer-supplier relationship perspective. Hum Resour Manage 1998; 37(2)117–129
- Weinrich MD, Carline JD, Giles LM, Ramsey PG. Ratings of the performances of practicing internists by hospital-based registered nurses. Acad Med 1993; 68: 680–687
- Woolliscroft JO, Howell JD, Patel BP, Swanson DB. Resident-patient interactions: The humanistic qualities of internal medicine residents assessed by patients, attending physicians, program supervisors and nurses. Acad Med 1994; 69(3)216–224