Randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis in medical education: What role do they play?

References

• Benson K, Hartz AJ. A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1878–1886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordage G. Moving the field forward: Going beyond quantitative-qualitative. Acad Med 2007; 82(Suppl. 10)S126–S128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordage G. Conceptual frameworks to illuminate and magnify. Med Educ 2009; 43: 312–319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney PA, Nierenberg DW, Pipas CF, Brooks WB, Stukel TA, Keller AM. Educational epidemiology: Applying population-based design and analytic approaches to study medical education. JAMA 2004; 292: 1044–1050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang JY, Chang GL, Chien CJ, Chung KC, Hsu AT. Effectiveness of two forms of feedback on training of a joint mobilization skill by using a joint translation simulator. Phys Ther 2007; 87: 418–430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark RE. Reconsidering research on learning from media. Rev Educ Res 1983; 53: 445–459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colliver JA, Kucera K, Verhulst SJ. Meta-analysis of quasi-experimental research: Are systematic narrative reviews indicated?. Med Educ 2008; 42: 858–865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1887–1892
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA. The research we still are not doing: An agenda for the study of computer-based learning. Acad Med 2005; 80: 541–548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA. Narrowing the focus and broadening horizons: Complementary roles for nonsystematic and systematic reviews. Adv Health Sci Educ 2008; 13: 391–395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA. Avoiding confounded comparisons in education research. Med Educ 2009; 43: 102–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA. One drop at a time: Research to advance the science of simulation. Simul Healthc 2010; 5: 1–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cook DA, Beckman TJ. Reflections on experimental research in medical education. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2008; 15(3)455–464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA, Bordage G, Schmidt HG. Description, justification, and clarification: A framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education. Med Educ 2008a; 42: 128–133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA, Erwin PJ, Triola MM. Computerized virtual patients in health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med 2010a; 85: 1589–1602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Szostek JH, Wang AT, Erwin P, Hamstra S. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2011a; 306: 978–988
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S. Method and reporting quality in health professions education research: A systematic review. Med Educ 2011b; 45: 227–238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. Internet-based learning in the health professions: A meta-analysis. JAMA 2008b; 300: 1181–1196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. Instructional design variations in internet-based learning for health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med 2010b; 85: 909–922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA, Thompson WG, Thomas KG. Case-based or non-case-based questions for teaching postgraduate physicians: A randomized crossover trial. Acad Med 2009; 84: 1419–1425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA, Thompson WG, Thomas KG, Thomas MR, Pankratz VS. Impact of self-assessment questions and learning styles in web-based learning: A randomized, controlled, crossover trial. Acad Med 2006; 81: 231–238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis D, O’Brien MAT, Freemantle N, Wolf FM, Mazmanian P, Taylor-Vaisey A. Impact of formal continuing medical education: Do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes?. JAMA 1999; 282: 867–874
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman CP, France CL, Drossman DD. A randomized comparison of alternative formats for clinical simulations. Med Decis Making 1991; 11: 265–272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass GV. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educ Researcher 1976; 5(10)3–8
   Google Scholar
• Gruppen LD. Is medical education research ‘hard’ or ‘soft’ research?. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2008; 13: 1–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harden RM, Grant J, Buckley G, Hart IR. BEME guide no. 1: Best evidence medical education. Med Teach 1999; 21: 553–562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatala RM, Brooks LR, Norman GR. Practice makes perfect: The critical role of mixed practice in the acquisition of ECG interpretation skills. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2003; 8: 17–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T. Complex interventions: How “out of control” can a randomised controlled trial be?. BMJ 2004; 328: 1561–1563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerfoot BP, Baker HE, Koch MO, Connelly D, Joseph DB, Ritchey ML. Randomized, controlled trial of spaced education to urology residents in the United States and Canada. J Urol 2007; 177: 1481–1487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopp V, Stark R, Fischer MR. Fostering diagnostic knowledge through computer-supported, case-based worked examples: Effects of erroneous examples and feedback. Med Educ 2008; 42: 823–829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau J, Ioannidis JPA, Schmid CH. Quantitative synthesis in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127: 820–826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin K. Problems of research in social psychology. Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers, DC Artwright. Harper & Row, New York 1951; 155–169
   Google Scholar
• Ma IW, Brindle ME, Ronksley PE, Lorenzetti DL, Sauve RS, Ghali WA. Use of simulation-based education to improve outcomes of central venous catheterization: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med 2011; 86: 1137–1147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcgaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB. Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad Med 2011; 86: 706–711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mennin S. Self-organisation, integration and curriculum in the complex world of medical education. Med Educ 2010; 44: 20–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montori VM, Swiontkowski MF, Cook DJ. Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; 413: 43–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman G. RCT = results confounded and trivial: The perils of grand educational experiments. Med Educ 2003; 37: 582–584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman G. Chaos, complexity and complicatedness: Lessons from rocket science. Med Educ 2011; 45: 549–559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist review – A new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res Policy 2005; 10(Suppl. 1)21–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Regehr G. It's NOT rocket science: Rethinking our metaphors for research in health professions education. Med Educ 2010; 44: 31–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thistlethwaite, Hammick, Davies, Greenhalgh, Dornan, Calese S. 2012. What is evidence? Reflections on the AMEE symposium, Vienna, August 2011. Med Teach 34(6)
   Google Scholar
• Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Pawson R. Realist methods in medical education research: What are they and what can they contribute?. Med Educ 2012; 46: 89–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar