Residents provide feedback to their clinical teachers: Reflection through dialogue

References

• Arah OA, Heineman MJ, Lombarts KMJMH. Factors influencing residents' evaluations of clinical faculty member teaching qualities and role model status. Med Educ 2012; 46: 381–389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckman TJ, Lee MC, Rohren CH, Pankratz VS. Evaluating an instrument for the peer review of inpatient teaching. Med Teach 2003; 25(2)131–135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardin H DS, Redmon G. Attitudes of first-line supervisors toward subordinate appraisals. Hum Resource Manage 2006; 32(2–3)315–324
   Google Scholar
• Billett S. Learning in the workplace: Strategies for effective practice. Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest 2001
   Google Scholar
• Bradley E MS, Curry L, Buckser A, King KL, Kasl V, Anderson R. Expanding the Anderson model: The role of psychosocial factors in long-term care use. Health Serv Res 2002; 37(5)1221–1241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolmans DHJM, Tigelaar D. Building bridges between theory and practice in medical education using a design-based research approach: AMEE guide No. 60. Med Teach 2012; 34(1)1–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dierendonck D, van HC, Borrill C, Stride C. Effects of upward feedback on leadership behavior toward subordinates. J Manage Dev 2007; 26(3)228–238
   Google Scholar
• Fluit CR, Bolhuis S, Grol R, Laan R, Wensing M. Assessing the quality of clinical teachers: A systematic review of content and quality of questionnaires for assessing clinical teachers. J Gen Intern Med 2010; 25(12)137–145
   Google Scholar
• Fluit CR, Bolhuis S, Grol R, Ham M, Feskens R, Laan R, Wensing M. Evaluation and feedback for effective clinical teaching in postgraduate medical education: Validation of an assessment instrument incorporating the CanMEDS roles. Med Teach 2012; 34(11)893–901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank JR, Danoff D. The CanMEDS initiative: Implementing an outcomes-based framework of physician competencies. Med Teach 2007; 29(7)642–647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall JL, Leiaecker JK, DiMarco C. What we know about upward appraisals of management: Facilitating the future use of UPAs. Hum Resource Dev Quart 1996; 7(3)209–226
   Google Scholar
• Kluger AN, DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: Historical review, a meta-analysis and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull 2006; 119: 254–284
   Google Scholar
• Leach DC. Evaluation of competency: An ACGME perspective. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 79(5)487–489
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leach DC. The ACGME competencies: Substance or form? Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. J Am Coll Surg 2001; 192(3)396–398
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nation JG, Carmichael E, Fidler H, Violato C. The development of an instrument to assess clinical teaching with linkage to CanMEDS roles: A psychometric analysis. Med Teach 2011; 33(6)e290–e296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol D, Macfarlane-Dick D. Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education 2006; 31(2)199–218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norcini JJ. Peer assessment of competence. Med Educ 2003; 37(6)539–543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penny AR, Coe R. Effectiveness of consultation on student ratings feedback: A meta-analysis. Rev Educ Res 2004; 74(2)215–253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp T, Nieveen N, (editors). 2010. An introduction to educational design research. Enschede: Netzodruk
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey PG, Wenrich MD, Carline JD, Inui TS, Larson EB, LoGerfo JP. Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance. JAMA 1993; 269(13)1655–1660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant JM, Mann KV, Vleuten van de C, Metsemakers JF. Reflection: A link between receiving and using assessment feedback. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2009; 14(3)399–410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith AFR, Fortunato VJ. Factors influencing employee intentions to provide honest upward feedback ratings. J Bus Psychol 2008; 22: 191–207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell L, Tallett S, Haist S, Hays R, Norcini J, Prince K, et al. A review of the evaluation of clinical teaching: New perspectives and challenges. Med Educ 2000; 34(10)862–870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalmeijer RE, Dolmans DH, Wolfhagen IH, Peters WG, van CL, Scherpbier AJ. Combined student ratings and self-assessment provide useful feedback for clinical teachers. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2010; 15(3)315–328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 't Hart H, Boeije BH, Hox J, (editors). 2005. Onderzoeksmethoden. Amsterdam: Boom Onderwijs.
   Google Scholar
• Waldman DAL. Attitudinal and behavioral outcomes of an upward feedback process. Group Org Manage 2001; 26(2)189–205
   Google Scholar