Using focus groups in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 91

References

• British Sociological Association. 2002. Statement of ethical practice for the British Sociological Association. [Accessed 24 February 2014] Available from http://www.britsoc.co.uk/about/equality/statement-of-ethical-practice.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Barbour RS. 2005. Making sense of focus groups. Med Educ 39(7):742–750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbour RS. 2007. Doing focus groups. London: SAGE Publications Ltd
   Google Scholar
• Bergman E, de Feijter J, Frambach J, Godefrooij M, Slootweg I, Stalmeijer R, van der Zwet J. 2012. AM last page: A guide to research paradigms relevant to medical education. Acad Med 87(4):545
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bloor M, Frankland J, Thomas M, Robson K. 2001. Focus groups in social research. London: Sage Publications
   Google Scholar
• Bombeke K, Symons L, Vermeire E, Debaene L, Schol S, De Winter B, Van Royen P. 2012. Patient-centeredness from education to practice: The ‘lived’ impact of communication skills training. Med Teach 34(5):e338–e348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowling, A. (2002). Research methods in health: Investigating health and health services. Buckingham: Open University Press
   Google Scholar
• Bunniss S, Kelly DR. 2010. Research paradigms in medical education research. Med Educ 44(4):358–366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke A. 2006. Qualitative interviewing: Encountering ethical issues and challenges. Nurse Res 13(4):19–29
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cleland J, Johnston PW, Walker L, Needham G. 2012. Attracting healthcare professionals to remote and rural medicine: Learning from doctors in training in the north of Scotland. Med Teach 34(7):e476–e482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffey M, Thomson K, Tallett S, Matlow A. 2010. Pediatric residents’ decision-making around disclosing and reporting adverse events: The importance of social context. Acad Med 85(10):1619–1625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Côté-Arsenault D, Morrison-Beedy D. 2005. Focus on research methods. Maintaining your focus in focus groups: Avoiding common mistakes. Res Nurs Health 28:172–179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crabtree BF, Miller WL. 1999. Doing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. 2013. Qualitative inquiry and research design. Choosing among five approaches. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage
   Google Scholar
• de Feijter JM, de Grave WS, Dorman T, Koopmans RP, Scherpbier AJ. 2011. Students’ perceptions of patient safety during the transition from undergraduate to postgraduate training: An activity theory analysis. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 16(3):347–358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. 2005. Paradigms and perspectives in contention. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. pp 183–190
   Google Scholar
• Duvivier RJ, van Geel K, van Dalen J, Scherpbier AJ, van der Vleuten CP. 2012. Learning physical examination skills outside timetabled training sessions: What happens and why? Adv Health Sci Educ 17(3):339–355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eide P, Kahn D. 2008. Ethical issues in the qualitative researcher – Participant relationship. Nurs Ethics 15(2):199–207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fieser J. 2009. Ethics, internet encyclopedia of philosophy, a peer-reviewed academic resources. [Accessed 2 May 2014] Available from http://www.iep.utm.edu/
   Google Scholar
• Flick U. 2004. Triangulation in qualitative research. In: Flick U, von Kardoff E, Steinke I, eds. A companion to qualitative research. London: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Frambach JM, van der Vleuten CP, Durning SJ. 2013. AM last page. Quality criteria in qualitative and quantitative research. Acad Med 88(4):552
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freeman T. (2006). ‘Best practice’ in focus group research: Making sense of different views. J Adv Nurs 56(5):491–497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire P. 1970. The pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin
   Google Scholar
• Gauld R, McMillan J. 1999. Ethics committees and qualitative health research in New Zealand. N Z Med J 112(1089):195–197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs A. 1997. Focus groups. Social Research Update 19(8). [Accessed 2 May 2014]. Available from http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU19.html
   Google Scholar
• Glaser B, Strauss A. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine
   Google Scholar
• Guba EG. 1990. The paradigm dialog. Newsbury Park, CA: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Holloway I, Wheeler S. 2010. Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare. 3rd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell
   Google Scholar
• Illing JT. 2007. Thinking about research: Frameworks, ethics and scholarship. Edinburgh: Association for the Study of Medical Education
   Google Scholar
• Kidd PS, Parshall MB. 2000. Getting the focus and the group: Enhancing analytical rigor in focus group research. Qual Health Res 10(3):293–308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger J. 1994. The methodology of Focus Groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Soc Health Illn 16(1):103–121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger J. 1995. Qualitative research: Introducing focus groups. Br Med J 311:299–302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger J, Barbour RS. 1999. Developing focus group research: Politics and practice. London: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Krueger RA. 1988. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
   Google Scholar
• Krueger RA. 1994. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
   Google Scholar
• Krueger RA, Casey MA. 2009. Focus groups, a practical guide for applied research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
   Google Scholar
• Kuper A, Lingard L, Levinson W. 2008. Critically appraising qualitative research. Br Med J 337:a1035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzel AJ. 1992. Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In: Crabtree BF, Miller WL, editors. Doing qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. pp 31–44
   Google Scholar
• Lefroy J, Brosnan C, Creavin S. 2011. Some like it hot: Medical student views on choosing the emotional level of a simulation. Med Educ 45(4):354–361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Lingard L, Garwood S, Poenaru D. 2004. Tensions influencing operating room team function: Does institutional context make a difference? Med Educ 38(7):691–699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald ME, Carnevale FA, Razack S. 2007. Understanding what residents want and what residents need: The challenge of cultural training in pediatrics. Med Teach 29(5):444–451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud K. 2001. Qualitative research: Standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet 358(9280):483–488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann K, van der Vleuten C, Eva K, Armson H, Chesluk B, Dornan T, Holmboe E, Lockyer J, Loney E, Sargeant J. 2011. Tensions in informed self-assessment: How the desire for feedback and reticence to collect and use it can conflict. Acad Med 86(9):1120–1127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauthner NS, Doucet A. 2003. Reflexive accounts and accounts of reflexivity in qualitative data analysis. Sociology 37(3):413–431
   Google Scholar
• Mays N, Pope C. 1995. Rigour and qualitative research. Br Med J 311:109–112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntosh S, Block RC, Kapsak G, Pearson TA. 2008. Training medical students in community health: A novel required fourth-year clerkship at the University of Rochester. Acad Med 83(4):357–364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton RK, Kendall PL. 1946. The focussed interview. Am J Psychol 51(6):541–557
   Google Scholar
• Morgan DL. 1988. Focus groups as qualitative research. London: Sage Publications
   Google Scholar
• Morgan DL. 1996. Focus groups. Annu Rev Sociol 22(1):29–52
   Google Scholar
• Morse JM. 2001. Are these risks in qualitative research? Qualitative health research. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie AJ, Dickinson WB, Leech NL, Zoran AG. 2009. A qualitative framework for collecting and analyzing data in focus group research. Int J Qual Methods 8(3):1–21
   Google Scholar
• Orb A, Eisenhauer L, Wynaden D. 2001. Ethics in qualitative research. J Nurs Scholarsh 33(1):93–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen S. 2001. The practical, methodological and ethical dilemmas of conducting focus groups with vulnerable clients. J Adv Nurs 36(5):652–658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker A, Tritter J. 2006. Focus group method and methodology: Current practice and recent debate. Int J Res Method Educ 29(1):23–37
   Google Scholar
• Pope C, Mays N. 2009. Critical reflections on the rise of qualitative research. Br Med J 339(7723):737–739
   Google Scholar
• Powell RA, Single HM. 1996. Focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 8(5):499–504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabiee F. 2004. Focus-group interview and data analysis. Proc Nutr Soc 63:655–660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves S, Kuper A, Hodges BD. 2008. Qualitative research methodologies: Ethnography. BMJ 337:512–514
   Google Scholar
• Rennie SC, Crosby JR. 2002. Students’ perceptions of whistle blowing: Implications for self-regulation. A questionnaire and focus group survey. Med Educ 36(2):173–179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards H, Emslie C. 2000. The ‘doctor’ or the ‘girl from the University’? Considering the influence of professional roles on qualitative interviewing. Fam Pract 17(1):71–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards HM, Schwartz LJ. 2002. Ethics of qualitative research: Are there special issues for health services research? Fam Pract 19(2):135–139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson L. 1990. Writing strategies: Reaching diverse audiences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Riquelme A, Padilla O, Herrera C, Olivos T, Roman JA, Sarfatis A, Solis N, Pizarro M, Torres P, Roff S. 2013. Development of ACLEEM questionnaire, an instrument measuring residents’ educational environment in postgraduate ambulatory setting. Med Teach 35(1):e861–e866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slootweg I, Lombarts K, van der Vleuten C, Mann K, Jacobs J, Scherpbier A. 2013. Clinical teachers’ views on how teaching teams deliver and manage residency training. Med Teach 35(1):46–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smithson S, Hart J, Wass V. 2010. Students’ hopes and fears about early patient contact: Lessons to be learned about preparing and supporting students during the first year. Med Teach 32(1):e24–e30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalmeijer RE, Dolmans DH, Wolfhagen IH, Scherpbier AJ. 2009. Cognitive apprenticeship in clinical practice: Can it stimulate learning in the opinion of students? Adv Health Sci Educ 14(4):535–546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stergiopoulos V, Maggi J, Sockalingam S. 2010. Teaching and learning the physician manager role: Psychiatry residents’ perspectives. Med Teach 32(7):e308–e314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart D, Shamdasani P, Rook D. 2007. Focus groups: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
   Google Scholar
• Stewart D, Shamdasani PN. 1990. Focus groups: Theory and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications
   Google Scholar
• Strand P, Sjoborg K, Stalmeijer R, Wichmann-Hansen G, Jakobsson U, Edgren G. 2013. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Undergraduate Clinical Education Environment Measure (UCEEM). Med Teach 35(12):1014–1026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J. 1998. Basics of qualitative research grounded theory procedures and technique. London: Sage Publications
   Google Scholar
• Telner DE, Carroll JC, Talbot Y. 2008. Genetics education in medical school: A qualitative study exploring educational experiences and needs. Med Teach 30(2):192–198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiberius R. 2006. The Focus Group Guide. University of Miami: Miller School of Medicine
   Google Scholar
• Turney L, Pocknee C. 2008. Virtual focus groups: New frontiers in research. Int J Qual Methods 4(2):32–43
   Google Scholar
• Wade L, Harrison C, Hollands J, Mattick K, Ricketts C, Wass V. 2012. Student perceptions of the progress test in two settings and the implications for test deployment. Adv Health Sci Educ 17(4):573–583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh K. 2013. When I say … triangulation. Med Educ 47(9):866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar