The supervisor’s toolkit: A framework for doctoral supervision in health professions education: AMEE Guide No. 104

References

• Adendorff H. 2011. Strangers in a strange land–on becoming scholars of teaching. London Rev of Ed 9(3):305–315
   Google Scholar
• Albertyn RM, Kapp CA, Frick BL. 2007. Taking the sting out of evaluation: Rating scales for thesis examination. SAJHE 8(21):1207–1221
   Google Scholar
• Amundsen C, McAlpine L. 2009. ‘Learning supervision’: Trial by fire. Innov Ed Teach Int 46(3):331–342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASSAf. (The Council of the Academy of Science of South Africa) 2010. The PhD study: An evidenced-based study on how to meet the demands for high-level skills in an emerging economy. Available from http://www.assaf.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/40696
   Google Scholar
• Barnett R, Di Napoli R. 2007. Changing identities in higher education: Voicing perspectives. Oxford: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Batchelor D, Di Napoli R. 2006. Special Issue: The doctoral journey: Perspectives. Educate 6(1):13–24
   Google Scholar
• Bezuidenhout J, Van Schalkwyk S. 2015. Developing the research question: setting the course for your research travels. In: Cleland J, Durning S. editors. Researching Medical Education. Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford. pp 35–41
   Google Scholar
• Bitzer EM, Albertyn RM. 2011. Alternative approaches to postgraduate supervision: A planning tool to facilitate supervisory processes. SAJHE 25(5):875–888
   Google Scholar
• Boud D, Lee A editors. 2009. Changing practices of doctoral education. London: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Brew A, Peseta T. 2004. Changing postgraduate supervision practice: A programme to encourage learning through reflection and feedback. Innov Ed Teach Int 41(1):5–22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell PH, Oldmeadow W, Jones CA. 2012. Supervisory needs of research doctoral students in a university teaching hospital setting. J Paed Child Health 48(10):907–912
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland J, Durning S. 2015. Researching medical education. London: Wiley Blackwell
   Google Scholar
• Cusimano MD, David MA. 1998. A compendium of higher education opportunities in health professions education. Acad Med 73(12):1255–1259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Kleijn RA, Mainhard MT, Meijer PC, Pilot A, Brekelmans M. 2012. Master's thesis supervision: Relations between perceptions of the supervisor–student relationship, final grade, perceived supervisor contribution to learning and student satisfaction. Stud High Ed 37(8):925–939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle NJ, Peterson ER. 2004. Conceptions of learning and knowledge in higher education: Relationships with study behaviour and influences of learning environments. Int J Ed Res 41(6):407–428
   Google Scholar
• Eva KW. 2008. The cross-cutting edge: Striving for symbiosis between medical education research and related disciplines. Med Ed 42(10):950–951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frick L. 2011. Facilitating creativity in doctoral education: A resource for supervisors. In: Kumar V, Lee A. Doctoral education in international context. Serdang: Penerbit Unversiti Putra Malaysia. pp 123–137
   Google Scholar
• Grant B. 2003. Mapping the pleasures and risks of supervision. Discourse 24(2):175–190
   Google Scholar
• Green B. 2005. Unfinished business: subjectivity and supervision. High Ed Res Dev 24(2):151–163
   Google Scholar
• Green B, Lee A. 1995. Theorising postgraduate pedagogy. Austr Universities Review 2:1995.
   Google Scholar
• Gunnarsson R, Jonasson G, Billhult A. 2013. The experience of disagreement between students and supervisors in PhD education: A qualitative study. BMC Med Ed 13(1):134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halse C. 2011. ‘Becoming a supervisor’: The impact of doctoral supervision on supervisors' learning. Stud High Ed 36(5):557–570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jazvac-Martek M. 2009. Oscillating role identities: the academic experiences of education doctoral students. Innov EdTeach Int 46(3):253–264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane R, Sandretto S, Heath C. 2004. An investigation into excellent tertiary teaching: Emphasising reflective practice. High Ed 47(3):283–310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiley M, Wisker G. 2009. Threshold concepts in research education and evidence of threshold crossing. High Ed Res Dev 28(4):431–441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee A. 2008. How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Stud High Ed 33(3):267–281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee A, Kamler B. 2008. Bringing pedagogy to doctoral publishing. Teach High Ed 13(5):511–523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manathunga C, Goozée J. 2007. Challenging the dual assumption of the ‘always/already’autonomous student and effective supervisor. Teach High Ed 12(3):309–322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCallin A, Nayar S. 2012. Postgraduate research supervision: A critical review of current practice. TeachHigh Ed 17(1):63–74
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch, A Singh, V Van Schalkwyk, S Wisker, G. (2016). Excellence in doctoral supervision: An examination of authoritative sources across four countries in search of performance higher than competence. Qual High Ed. [Epub ahead of print]. DOI: 10.1080/13538322.2016.1144904
   Google Scholar
• McPhail J, Erwee R. 2000. Developing professional relationships between supervisors and doctorial candidates. Austr J Management Org Behav 3(1):76–90
   Google Scholar
• Meyer JH, Land R. 2005. Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. High Ed 49(3):373–388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezirow J. 2003. Transformative learning as discourse. J Transformative Ed 1(1):58–63
   Google Scholar
• Mowbray S, Halse C. 2010. The purpose of the PhD: Theorising the skills acquired by students. High Ed Res Dev 29(6):653–664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Department of Higher Education and Training (NDHET). 2013. The higher education sub-qualifications framework. Notice 1040 of 2012; Government Gazette No. 36003 of 14 December 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Nulty D, Kiley M, Meyers N. 2009. Promoting and recognising excellence in the supervision of research students: An evidence-based framework. Assess Eval High Ed 34(6):693–707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson M, Brew A. 2002. Research training and supervision development. Stud High Ed 27(2):135–150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugsley L, Brigley S, Allery L, MacDonald J. 2008. Making a difference: Researching master’s and doctoral research programmes in medical education. Med Ed 42(2):157–163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samara A. 2006. Group supervision in graduate education: A process of supervision skill development and text improvement. High Ed Res Dev 25(2):115–129
   Google Scholar
• Tekian A. 2014. Doctoral programs in health professions education. Med Teach 36(1):73–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tekian A, Artino AR. 2013. AM last page: Master's degree in health professions education programs. Acad Med 88(9):1399
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trafford V, Leshem S. 2009. Doctorateness as a threshold concept. Innov Ed Teach Int 46(3):305–316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Schalkwyk S. 2010. When the teacher becomes the student: The acquisition of academic literacy revisited. Acta Acad: Supplementum 1:201–222
   Google Scholar
• Van Schalkwyk S. 2014. Evolving doctoral identities: Understanding ‘complex investments’. In: Bitzer EM, Albertyn RM, Frick L, Grant B, Kelly F editors. Pushing boundaries in postgraduate supervision. Stellenbosch: SUNMedia. pp 215–227
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou S, Skopeliti I. 2014. Conceptual change from the framework theory side of the fence. Sci & Ed 23(7):1427–1445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellington J. 2013. Searching for ‘doctorateness’. Stud High Ed 38(10):1490–1503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger E. 2000. Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization 7(2):225–246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisker G, Robinson G, Trafford V, Warnes M, Creighton E. 2003. From supervisory dialogues to successful PhDs: Strategies supporting and enabling the learning conversations of staff and students at postgraduate level. Teach High Ed 8(3):383–397
   Google Scholar
• Young JQ, Van Merrienboer J, Durning S, Ten Cate O. 2014. Cognitive load theory: Implications for medical education: AMEE guide no. 86. Med Teach 36(5):371–384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar