214
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Obstetrics

The use of STAN monitoring in the labour ward

, &
Pages 465-469 | Published online: 06 Jul 2010

References

  • Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GML. 2006. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (3): CD006066.
  • Amer-Wahlin I, Arulkumaran S, Hagberg H, Marsál K, Visser GH. 2007. Fetal electrocardiogram: ST waveform analysis in intra-partum surveillance. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 114:1191–1193.
  • Ayres-de-Campos D, Sousa P, Costa A, Bernardes J. 2008. Omniview-SisPorto 3.5 – a central fetal monitoring station with online alerts based on computerized cardiotocogram + ST event analysis. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 36:260–264.
  • CEMACH. 2009. Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH) Perinatal Mortality 2007: England, Wales and Northern Ireland. London: CEMACH.
  • Costa A, Ayres-de-Campos D, Costa F, Santos C, Bernardes J. 2009. Prediction of neonatal acidemia by computer analysis of fetal heart rate and ST event signals. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 201:464.e1–464.e6.
  • Doria V, Papageorghiou AT, Gustafsson A, Ugwumadu A, Farrer K, Arulkumaran S. 2007. Review of the first 1502 cases of ECG-ST waveform analysis during labour in a teaching hospital. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1202–1207.
  • Heintz E, Brodtkorb TH, Nelson N, Levin LA. 2008. The long-term cost-effectiveness of fetal monitoring during labour: a comparison of cardiotocography complemented with ST analysis versus cardiotocography alone. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 115:1676–1687.
  • Kale A, Chong YS, Biswas A. 2008. Effect of availability of fetal ECG monitoring on operative deliveries. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 87:1189–1193.
  • Luttkus AK, Norén H, Stupin JH, Blad S, Arulkumaran S, Erkkola R, et al 2004. Fetal scalp pH and ST analysis of the fetal ECG as an adjunct to CTG. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 32:486–494.
  • Massoud M, Giannesi A, Amabile N, Manevy M, Geron G, Gaucherand P. 2007. Fetal electrocardiotocography in labor and neonatal outcome: An observational study in 1889 patients in the French center of Edouard Herriot, Lyon. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 20:819–824.
  • Norén H, Blad S, Carlsson A, Flisberg A, Gustavsson A, Lilja H, et al 2006. STAN in clinical practice – the outcome of 2 years of regular use in the city of Gothenburg. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 195:7–15.
  • Ojala K, Mäkikallio K, Haapsamo M, Ijäs H, Tekay A. 2008. Interobserver agreement in the assessment of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography in singleton pregnancies. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 87:536–540.
  • Parisaei M, Harrington K, Erskine K. 2009. Maternal satisfaction and acceptability of foetal electrocardiographic (STAN®) monitoring system. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 30 October [Epub ahead of print].
  • Rault S, Vayssiere C, Roth E, David E, Favre R, Langer B. 2008. Assessment of STAN S21 fetal heart monitor by medical staff. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 102:8–11.
  • RCOG. 2005. Operative vaginal delivery. Guideline No. 26. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
  • Vayssière C, David E, Meyer N, Haberstich R, Sebahoun V, Roth E, et al 2007. A French randomized controlled trial of ST-segment analysis in a population with abnormal cardiotocograms during labor. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 197:299.e1–299.e6.
  • Vayssière C, Tsatsaris V, Pirrello O, Cristini C, Arnaud C, Goffinet F. 2009. Inter-observer agreement in clinical decision-making for abnormal cardiotocogram (CTG) during labour: a comparison between CTG and CTG plus STAN. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 116:1081–1087.
  • Westerhuis ME, Kwee A, van Ginkel AA, Drogtrop AP, Gyselaers WJ, Visser GH. 2007. Limitations of ST analysis in clinical practice: three cases of intrapartum metabolic acidosis. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 114:1194–1201.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.