229
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Obstetrics

A prospective double blind study using oral versus vaginal misoprostol for labour induction

, &
Pages 461-464 | Published online: 06 Jul 2010

References

  • Abbassi RM, Sirichand P, Rizvi S. 2008. Safety and efficacy of oral versus vaginal misoprostol use for induction of labor at term. Journal of College of Physicians and Surgeons, Pakistan 18:625–629.
  • ACOG. 1999. Practice Bulletin No. 10. Committee on Obstetrics. Induction of labor. Washington: American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
  • Alfirevic Z, Weeks A. 2006. Oral misoprostol for induction of labor. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2): CD001338.
  • Bennett KA, Butt K, Crane JM, Hutchens D, Young DC. 1998. A masked randomized comparison of oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol for labor induction. Obstetrics and Gynecology 92:481–486.
  • Colón I, Clawson K, Hunter K, Druzin ML, Taslimi MM. 2005. Prospective randomized clinical trial of inpatient cervical ripening with stepwise oral misoprostol vs vaginal misoprostol. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 192:747–752.
  • Fisher SA, Mackenzie VP, Davies GA. 2001. Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 185:906–910.
  • Goldberg AB, Greenberg MB, Darney PD. 2001. Misoprostol and Pregnancy. New England Journal of Medicine 344:38–47.
  • Hall R, Duarte-Gardea M, Harlass F. 2002. Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for labor induction. Obstetrics and Gynecology 99:1044–1048.
  • Kundodyiwa TW, Alfirevic Z, Weeks AD. 2009. Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labor: a systematic review. Obstetrics and Gynecology 113:374–383.
  • Kwon JS, Davies GA, Mackenzie VP. 2001. A comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized trial. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 108:23–26.
  • Paungmora N, Herabutya Y, O-Prasertsawat P, Punyavachira P. 2004. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 30:358–362.
  • Rasheed R, Alam AA, Younus S, Raza F. 2007. Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for labor induction. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association 57:404–407.
  • Sultana N, Rouf S, Rashid M. 2006. Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor. Journal of the Bangladesh College of Surgeons 24:44–49.
  • Wing DA, Ham D, Paul RH. 1999. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 180:1155–1160.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.