303
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Training

Delivery of the deeply engaged head: a lacuna in training

, &
Pages 545-549 | Published online: 11 Aug 2010

References

  • Blickstein I. 2004. Difficult delivery of the impacted fetal head during cesarean section: intraoperative disengagement dystocia. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 32:465–469.
  • Fasubaa OB, Ezechi OC, Orji EO, Ogunniyi SO, Akindele ST, Loto OM et al 2002. Delivery of the impacted head of the fetus at caesarean section after prolonged obstructed labour: a randomised comparative study of two methods. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 22:375–378.
  • Fong YF, Arulkumaran S. 1997. Breech Extraction – an alternative method of delivering a deeply engaged head at cesarean section. International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 56:184–184.
  • Landesman R, Graber EA. 1984. Abdominovaginal delivery: Modification of the cesarean section operation to facilitate delivery of the impacted head. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 148:707–710.
  • Levy R, Chernomoretz T, Appelman Z. 2005. Head pushing versus reverse breech extraction in cases of impacted fetal head during caesarean section. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 121:24–26.
  • Menticoglou SM, Schneider CE. 2007. An alternative method to deliver the impacted head at caesarean section. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Canada 29:18–19.
  • RCOG. 1999. Towards safer childbirth: minimum standards for the organisation of labour wards. Report of a Joint Working Party, RCOG.
  • RCOG. 2001. The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. RCOG Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit, October.
  • RCOG. 2006. A career in obstetrics and gynaecology: recruitment and retention in the specialty. RCOG, January.
  • RCOG. 2009. The impact of European working time directive on obstetrics and gynaecology. RCOG statement.
  • Singh M, Verma R. 2008. Reducing complications associated with a deeply engaged head at caesarean section: a simple instrument. Obstetrician and Gynaecologist 10:38–41.
  • Spencer C, Murphy D, Bewley S. 2006. Caesarean delivery in the second stage of labour. British Medical Journal 333:613–614.
  • Sung JF, Daniels KI, Brodzinsky L, El-Sayed YY, Caughey AB, Lyell DJ. 2007. Cesarean delivery outcomes after a prolonged second stage of labor. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 197:306.e1–e5.
  • Tan EK. 2007. Difficult caesarean delivery of an impacted head and neonatal fracture: Can the morbidity be avoided? Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 27:427–428.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.