Apgar scores in assessing morbidity of the second neonate of cephalic/non-cephalic twins in different delivery modes

References

• Anonymous. 1999. Special problems in multiple gestations. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 64:323–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BarrettJ, BockingA. 2000. The SOGC consensus statement on twin pregnancies (part I). Journal of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada 91:519–532.
   Google Scholar
• BlicksteinI, Schwartz-ShohamZ, LancetM, BorensteinR. 1987. Vaginal delivery of the second twin in breech presentation. Obstetrics and Gynecology 69:774–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BoggeesKA, ChisholmCA. 1997. Delivery of the nonvertex second twin: a review of the literature. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey 52:728–735.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CaukwellS, MurphyDJ. 2002. The effect of delivery and gestational age on neonatal outcome of the non-cephalic-presenting second twin. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 187:1356–1361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CrowtherCA. 2000. Caesarean delivery for the second twin. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews (2):CD000047.
   Google Scholar
• DeVecianaM, MajorC, MorganMA. 1995. Labor and delivery management of the multiple gestation. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 22:235–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ErdemogluE, MunganT, TapisizOl, UstunyurtE, CaglarE. 2003. Effect of inter-twin delivery time on Apgar scores of the second twin. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 43:203–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FishmanA, GrubbDK, KovacsBW. 1993. Vaginal delivery of the non-vertex second twin. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 168:861–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GockeSE, NageotteMP, GariteT, TowersCV, DorchesterW. 1989. Management of the non-vertex second twin: primary cesarean section, external version, or primary breech extraction. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 161:111–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GreigPC, VeilleJC, MorganT, HendersonL. 1992. The effect of presentation and mode of delivery on neonatal outcome in the second twin. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 167:901–906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HackKE, DerksJB, EliasSG, FranxA, RoosEJ, VoermanSK, et al. 2008. Increased perinatal mortality and morbidity in monochorionic versus dichorionic twin pregnancies: clinical implications of a large Dutch cohort study. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 115:58–67.
   Google Scholar
• HannahME, HannahWJ, HewsonSA, WillianAR. 2000. Planned caesarean versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: randomised multicenter trial. Lancet 356:1375–1383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HerbstA, KallenK. 2008. Influence of mode of delivery on neonatal mortality in the second twin at and before term. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 115:1512–1517.
   Google Scholar
• LewiL, JaniJ, BlicksteinI, HuberA, GucciardoL, Van MieghemT, et al. 2008. The outcome of monochorionic diamniotic twin gestations in the era of invasive fetal therapy: a prospective cohort study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 199:514–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LoprioreE, SlaghekkeF, OepkesD, MiddeldorpJM, VandenbusscheFP, WaltherFJ. 2010. Hematological characteristics in neonates with twin anemia-polycythemia sequence (TAPS). Prenatal Diagnosis 30:251–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrailCD, BryantDR. 2005. Inter-twin time interval: how it affects the immediate neonatal outcome of the second twin. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 192:1420–1422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PonsJC, DommerguesM, AyoubiJM, GelebartM, PapiernikE. 2002. Delivery of the second twin: comparison of two approaches. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 104:32–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RabinoviciJ, BarkaiG, ReichmanB, SerrD, MasshiachS. 1987. Randomised management of the second twin: vaginal delivery or cesarean section. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 156:52–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchmitzT, AzriaE, CabrolD, GoffinetF. 2009. Is vaginal delivery in twin pregnancy still an option? An analysis of the literature data. Journal de Gynécologie, Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction 38:367–376.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SmithGC, PellJP, DobbieR. 2002. Birth order, gestational age, and risk of delivery related perinatal death in twins: retrospective cohort study. British Medical Journal 325:1004–1009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorngren-JernceckK, HerbstA. 2001. Low 5-minute Apgar score: a population-based registry of 1 million term births. Obstetrics and Gynecology 98:65–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de RietJE, VandenbusscheFP, Le CessieS, KeirseMJ. 1999. Newborn assessment and long-term adverse outcome: a systematic review. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 180:1024–1029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WenSW, FungK, OppenheimerL, et al. 2004. Neonatal morbidity in second twin according to gestational age at birth and mode of delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 191:773–777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YangQ, WenSH, ChenY, KrewskiD, FungKFK, WalkerM. 2005. Neonatal death and morbidity in vertex-nonvertex second twins according to mode of delivery and birth weight. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 192:840–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZaidehSM, BadriaLF. 2000. Effect of mode of delivery on neonatal outcome of twins with birthweight under 1500g. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 264:128–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar