References
- Chang Y, Tsai EM, Long CY, Lee CL, Kay N. 2009. Resectoscopic treatment combined with sonohysterographic evaluation of women with postmenstrual bleeding as a result of previous caesarean delivery scar defects. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 200:370.e1–e4.
- Ecker JL, Frigoletto FD Jr. 2007. Caesarean delivery and the risk–benefit calculus. New England Journal of Medicine 356:885–888.
- Fabres C, Aviles G, De La Jara C, Escalona J, Muñoz JF, Mackenna A et al. 2003. The caesarean delivery scar pouch: clinical implications and diagnostic correlation between transvaginal sonography and hysteroscopy. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 22:695–700.
- Laws PJ, Hilder L. 2008. Australia’s mothers and babies 2006. Perinatal statistics series no. 22. Cat. no. PER 46. Sydney: AIHW National Perinatal Statistics Unit.
- Morris H. 1995. Surgical pathology of the lower uterine segment caesarean section scar: is the scar a source of clinical symptoms? International Journal of Gynecological Pathology 14:16–20.
- Regnard C, Nosbusch M, Fellemans C, Benali N, van Rysselberghe M, Barlow P et al. 2004. Cesarean section scar evaluation by saline contrast sonohysterography. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 23:289–292.
- Simpson WL, Beitia LG, Mester J. 2006. Hysterosalpingography: a reemerging study. RadioGraphics 26:419–431.
- Ubeda B, Paraira M, Alert E, Abuin RA. 2001. Hysterosalpingography: spectrum of normal variants and non-pathologic findings. American Journal of Roentgenology 177:131–135.
- Vikhareva Osser, O, Jokubkiene, L, Valentin, L. 2009. High prevalence of defects in Caesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 34:90–97.
- Wang C, Chiu W, Lee C, Sun Y, Lin Y, Tseng C. 2009. Caesarean scar defect: correlation between Caesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 34:85–89.