![The World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility (COGI). Click here to learn more.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112382/JournalAd-COGI2024-Leaderboard.jpg"})
References
- Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P et al. 1996. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 175:10–17.
- Clemons JL, Aguilar VC, Sokol ER, Jackson ND, Myers DL. 2004. Patient characteristics that are associated with continued pessary use versus surgery after 1 year. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 191:159–164.
- Matsubara S, Ohki Y. 2010. Can a ring pessary have a lasting effect to reverse uterine prolapse even after its removal? Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 36:459–461.
- Mutone MF, Terry C, Hale DS, Benson JT. 2005. Factors which influence the short-term success of pessary management of pelvic organ prolapse. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 193:89–94.