378
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
OBSTETRICS

Operative complications and fetal morbidity encountered in 300 prophylactic transabdominal cervical cerclage procedures by one obstetric surgeon

, &
Pages 713-717 | Published online: 15 Nov 2011

References

  • Al-Fadhli R, Tulandi T. 2004. Laparoscopic abdominal cerclage. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 31:497–504.
  • Benson RC, Durfee RB. 1965. Transabdominal cervico uterine cerclage during pregnancy for the treatment of cervical incompetency. Obstetrics and Gynecology 25:145–155.
  • Craig S, Fliegner JR. 1997. Treatment of cervical incompetence by transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 37:407–411.
  • Daskalakis GJ. 2009. Prematurity prevention: the role of cerclage. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 21:148–152.
  • Debbs RH, Chen J. 2009. Contemporary use of cerclage in pregnancy. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 52:597–610.
  • Debbs RH, DeLa Vega GA, Pearson S, Sehdev H, Marchiano D, Ludmir J. 2007. Transabdominal cerclage after comprehensive evaluation of women with previous unsuccessful transvaginal cerclage. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 197:317e1–317.e4.
  • Fick AL, Caughey AB, Parer JT. 2007. Transabdominal cerclage: can we predict who fails? Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 20:63–67.
  • Golfier F, Bessai K, Paparel P, Cassignol A, Vaudoyer F, Raudrant D. 2001. Transvaginal cervicoisthmic cerclage as an alternative to the transabdominal technique. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 100:16–21.
  • Harger JH. 1983. Cervical cerclage: patient selection, morbidity, and success rates. Clinics in Perinatology 10:321–341.
  • Hole J, Tressler T, Martinez F. 2003. Elective and emergency transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage for cervical incompetence. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 48:596–600.
  • Iams JD, Johnson FF, Sonek J, Sachs L, Gebauer C, Samuels P. 1995. Cervical competence as a continuum: a study of ultrasonographic cervical length and obstetric performance. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 172:1097–1106.
  • Knudtson EJ, Peck J, Skaggs V, Elimian A, Goodman J, Stanley J. 2010. Evaluation of outcomes after transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 281:891–894.
  • Lotgering FK, Gaugler-Senden IP, Lotgering SF, Wallenburg HC. 2006. Outcome after transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage. Obstetrics and Gynecology 107:779–784.
  • Mahran M. 2000. Transabdominal cervical cerclage. Current Obstetrics and Gynaecology 10:99–102.
  • Novy MJ. 1991. Transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage: a reappraisal 25 years after its introduction. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 164:1635–1642.
  • Rand L, Norwitz ER. 2003. Current controversies in cervical cerclage. Seminars in Perinatology 27:73–85.
  • Simcox R, Shennan A. 2007. Cervical cerclage in the prevention of preterm birth. Best Practice and Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 21:831–842.
  • Sumners JE, Moore ES, Ramsey CJ, Eggleston MK. 2011. Transabdominal cervical cerclage in triplet pregnancies and risk of extreme prematurity and neonatal loss. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 31:111–117.
  • Turnquest MA, Britton KA, Brown HL. 1999. Outcome of patients undergoing transabdominal cerclage: a descriptive study. Journal of Maternal-Fetal Medicine 8:225–227.
  • Umstad MP, Quinn MA, Ades A. 2010. Transabdominal cervical cerclage. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 50:460–464.
  • Witt MU, Joy SD, Clark J, Herring A, Bowes WA, Thorp JM. 2009. Cervicoisthmic cerclage: transabdominal vs transvaginal approach. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 201:105.e1–105.e4.
  • Wolfe L, DePasquale S, Adair CD, Torres C, Stallings S, Briery C, . 2008. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic placement of transabdominal cerclage during pregnancy. American Journal of Perinatology 25:653–655.
  • Zaveri V, Aghajafari F, Amankwah K, Hannah M. 2002. Abdominal versus vaginal cerclage after a failed transvaginal cerclage: a systematic review. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 187: 868–872.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.