Medium-term effects of a monofilament polypropylene mesh for pelvic organ prolapse and sexual function symptoms

References

• Abdel-Fattah M, Ramsay I, and the West of Scotland Study Group. 2008. Retrospective multicentre study of the new minimally invasive mesh repair devices for pelvic organ prolapse. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 115:22–30.
   Google Scholar
• Allahdin S, Bain C, Glazener C. 2006. Feasibility study for a randomized controlled trial evaluating the use of absorbable mesh, polydioxanone and polyglactin sutures for anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse repairs. Abstracts of the International Continence Society 36th Annual Meeting, Christchurch, New Zealand, 27 November to 1 December 2006. Neurourology and Urodynamics 25:507–671.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benson JT, Lucente V, McClellan E. 1996. Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 175:1418–1422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey M, Higgs P, Goh J, Lim J, Leong A, Krause H, . 2009. Vaginal repair with mesh versus colporrhaphy for prolapse: a randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 116:1380–1386.
   Google Scholar
• Culligan PJ, Blackwell L, Goldsmith LJ, Graham CA, Rogers A, Heit MH. 2005. A randomized controlled trial comparing fascia lata and synthetic mesh for sacral colpopexy. Obstetrics and Gynecology 106: 29–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Tayrac R, Devoldere G, Renaudie J, Villard P, Guilbaud O, Eglin G; French Ugytex Study Group 2007. Prolapse repair by vaginal route using a new protected low-weight polypropylene mesh: 1-year functional and anatomical outcome in a prospective multicentre study. International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction 18: 251–256.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elmer C, Altman D, Engh ME, Axelsen S, Vayrynen T, Falconer C; Nordic Transvaginal Mesh Group 2009. Trocar-guided transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Obstetrics and Gynecology 113:117–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FDA. 2011. Safety Communication: UPDATE on serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Washington DC: FDA.
   Google Scholar
• Feiner B, Jelovsek JE, Maher C. 2009. Efficacy and safety of transvaginal mesh kits in the treatment of prolapse of the vaginal apex: a systematic review. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 116:15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Gauruder-Burmester A, Koutouzidou P, Tunn R. 2009. Effect of vaginal polypropylene mesh implants on sexual function. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 142: 76–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A. 2002. Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women's Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 186: 1160–1166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiltunen R, Nieminen K, Takala T, Heiskanen E, Merikari M, Niemi K . 2007. Low-weight polypropylene mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology 110(2 Pt 2):455–462.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jia X, Glazener C, Mowatt G, Jenkinson D, Fraser C, Bain C . 2010. Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of using mesh in surgery for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse. International Urogynecology Journal 21:1413–1431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia X, Glazener C, Mowatt G, MacLennan G, Bain C, Fraser C . 2007. Efficacy and safety of using mesh or grafts in surgery for anterior and/or posterior vaginal wall prolapse. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 115:1350–1361.
   Google Scholar
• Lowman JK, Jones LA, Woodman PJ, Hale DS. 2008. Does the Prolift system cause dyspareunia? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 199:707.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacLennan AH, Taylor AW, Wilson DH, Wilson D. 2000. The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 107:1460–1470.
   Google Scholar
• Maher C, Baessler K. 2006. Surgical management of anterior vaginal wall prolapse: an evidence based literature review. International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction 17:195–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher CF, Qatawneh AM, Dwyer PL, Carey MP, Cornish A, Schluter PJ. 2004. Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 190:20–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Marshall JC . 2009. No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 374:1105–1112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miedel A, Tegerstedt G, Mörlin B, Hammarström M. 2008. A 5-year prospective follow-up study of vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction 19:1593–1601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milani AL, Withagen MI, Schweitzer KJ, Janszen EW, Vierhout ME. 2010. Midline fascial plication under continuous digital transrectal control: which factors determine anatomic outcome? International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction 21:623–630.
   Google Scholar
• Moore RD, Miklos JR. 2009. Vaginal repair of cystocele with anterior wall mesh via transobturator route: efficacy and complications with up to 3-year follow-up. Advances in Urology 743831 (Epub Aug 24).
   Google Scholar
• Natale F, La Penna C, Padoa A, Agostini M, De Simone E, Cervigni M. 2009. A prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing Gynemesh, a synthetic mesh, and Pelvicol, a biologic graft, in the surgical treatment of recurrent cystocele. International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction 20:75–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen JN, Burchette RJ. 2008. Outcome after anterior vaginal prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology 111:891–898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieminen K, Hiltunen R, Heiskanen E, Takala T, Niemi K, Merikari M . 2008. Symptom resolution and sexual function after anterior vaginal wall repair with or without polypropylene mesh. International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction 19:1611–1616.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. 1997. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstetrics and Gynecology 89:501–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacquee S, Palit G, Jacquemyn Y. 2008. Complications and patient satisfaction after transobturator anterior and/or posterior tension-free vaginal polypropylene mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 87:972–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price N, Jackson SR, Avery K, Brookes ST, Abrams P. 2006. Development and psychometric evaluation of the ICIQ Vaginal Symptoms Questionnaire: the ICIQ–VS. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 113:700–712.
   Google Scholar
• Sand PK, Koduri S, Lobel RW, Winkler HA, Tomezsko J, Culligan PJ . 2001. Prospective randomized trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrence of cystoceles and rectoceles. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 184:1357–1364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sentilhes L, Berthier A, Sergent F, Verspyck E, Descamps P, Marpeau L. 2008. Sexual function in women before and after transvaginal mesh repair for pelvic organ prolapse. International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction 19:763–772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsia-Shu L, Wang AC. 1998. Abdominal colposacropexy and sacrospinous ligament suspension for severe uterovaginal prolapse: a comparison. Journal of Gynecologic Surgery 14:59–64.
   Google Scholar