![The World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility (COGI). Click here to learn more.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112382/JournalAd-COGI2024-Leaderboard.jpg"})
References
- Al-Fozan H, Dufort J, Kaplow M . 2002. Cost analysis of myomectomy, hysterectomy, and uterine artery embolisation. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 187:1401–1404.
- Al-Fozan H, Tulandi T. 2002. Factors affecting early surgical intervention after uterine artery embolisation. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey 57:810–815.
- Aungst M, Wilson M, Vournas K . 2004. Necrotic leiomyoma and gram-negative sepsis eight weeks after uterine artery embolization. Obstetrics and Gynecology 104:1161–1164.
- Coleman P, Ayiku L, Nicholl J . 2004. Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of uterine artery embolisation in the treatment of fibroids. NICE: London.
- McLucas B, Adler L, Perrella R. 2001. Uterine fibroid embolisation: nonsurgical treatment for symptomatic fibroids. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 192:95–105.
- Ravina JH, Herbreteau D, Ciraru-Vigneron N . 1995. Arterial embolisation to treat uterine myomata. Lancet 346:671–672.
- RCOG/RCR. 2000. Clinical recommendations on the use of uterine artery embolisation for the management of fibroids. Report of a joint working party. London: Royal College of Obstetrician and Gynaecologists.
- Spies JB, Spector A, Roth AR . 2002. Complications after uterine artery embolisation for leiomyomas. Obstetrics and Gynecology 100:873–880.
- Walker WJ, Pelage JP. 2002. Uterine artery embolisation for symptomatic fibroids: clinical results in 400 women with imaging follow up. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 109:1262–1272.