![The World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility (COGI). Click here to learn more.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112382/JournalAd-COGI2024-Leaderboard.jpg"})
References
- Bayramoglu O, Arslan M, Yazici FG, Erdem A, Erdem M, Bayramoglu K et al. 2005. Prediction of spontaneous onset of labour at term: the role of cervical length measurement and funneling of internal cervical os detected by transvaginal ultrasonography. American Journal of Perinatology22:35–39.
- Bergelin I, Valentin L. 2001. Pattern of normal change in cervical length and width during pregnancy in nulliparous women: a prospective, longitudinal ultrasound study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology18:217–222.
- Bergelin I, Valentin L. 2002. Normal cervical changes in parous women during the second half of pregnancy – a prospective longitudinal ultrasound study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica81:31–38.
- Brieger GM, Ning XH, Dawkins RR. 1997. Transvaginal sonographic assessment of cervical dynamics during the third trimester of normal pregnancy. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica76:118–122.
- Gramellini D, Fieni S, Molina E, Berretta R, Vadora E. 2002. Transvaginal sonographic cervical length changes during normal pregnancy. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine21:227–232.
- Hernandez-Andrade E, Romero R, Ahn H, Yeo L, Korzeniewski SJ, Chaiworapongsa T et al. 2012. Transabdominal evaluation of uterine cervical length during pregnancy fails to identify a substantial number of women with a short cervix. Journal of maternal-fetal and neonatal medicine25:1682–1689.
- Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Van Holsbeke C, Van Der Tweel I, Stoutenbeek P, Visser GHA. 2008. Sonographic longitudinal cervical length measurements in nulliparous women at term: prediction of spontaneous onset of labour. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology32:652–656.
- Murakawa H, Utumi T, Hasgawa I, Tanaka K, Fuzimori R. 1993. Evaluation of preterm delivery by transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length. Obstetrics and Gynecology82:829–832.
- Ramanathan G, Yu C, Osei E, Nicolaides KH. 2003. Ultrasound examination at 37 weeks’ gestation in the prediction of pregnancy outcome: the value of cervical assessment. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology22:598–603.
- Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Hessabi M. 2000. Comparison of the Bishop score, ultrasonographically measured cervical length, and fetal fibronectin assay in predicting time until delivery and type of delivery at term. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology182: 108–113.
- Stone PR, Chan EH, McCowan LM, Taylor RS, Mitchell JM; SCOPE Consortium. 2010. Transabdominal scanning of the cervix at the 20-week morphology scan: comparison with transvaginal cervical measurements in a healthy nulliparous population. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology50:523–527.
- Vimercari A, Greco P, Lopalco PL. 2001. The value of ultrasonographic examination of the uterine cervix in predicting post-term pregnancy. Journal of Perinatal Medicine29:317–321.
- Zorzoli A, Soliani A, Perra M, Caravelli E, Galimberri A, Nicolini U. 1994. Cervical changes throughout pregnancy as assessed by transvaginal sonography. Obstetrics and Gynecology84:960–964.