![The World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility (COGI). Click here to learn more.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112382/JournalAd-COGI2024-Leaderboard.jpg"})
References
- Austin SC, Sanchez-Ramos L, Adair CD. 2010. Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol compared with the dinoprostone vaginal insert: a systematic review and metaanalysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 202:e1–e9.
- Begley C, Devane D, Clarke M, McCann C, Hughes P, Reilly M et al. 2011. Comparison of midwife-led and consultant-led care of healthy women at low risk of childbirth complications in the Republic of Ireland: a randomized trial. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 29:85.
- Calder AA, Loughney AD, Weir CJ, Barber JW. 2008. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 115:1279–1288.
- Devane D, Lalor JG, Daly S, McGuire W, Smith V. 2012. Cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation of fetal heart on admission to labour ward for assessment of fetal wellbeing. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2:CD005122.
- Facchinetti F, Fontanesi F, Del Giovane C. 2012. Pre-induction of labour: comparing dinoprostone vaginal insert to repeated prostaglandin administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Maternal Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 25:1965–1969.
- Güngördük K, Asicioglu O, Besimoglu B, Güngördük OC, Yildirm G, Ark C et al. 2012. Labor induction in term premature rupture of membranes: comparison between oxytocin and dinoprostone followed 6 h later by oxytocin. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 206:60.e1–e8.
- Haas J, Barzilay E, Chayen B, Lebovitz O, Yinon Y, Hendler I et al. 2013. Safety of labor induction with prostaglandin E2 in grandmultiparous women. Journal of Maternal Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 26:49–51.
- Koc O, Duran B, Ozdemirci S, Albayrak M, Koc U. 2013. Oxytocin versus sustained-release dinoprostone vaginal pessary for labor induction of unfavorable cervix with Bishop score ≥ 4 and ≤ 6: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 39: 790–798.
- O’Brien E, Rauf Z, Alfirevic Z, Lavender T. 2013. Patient's experiences of outpatient induction of labour with remote continuous monitoring. Midwifery 29:325–331.
- Ozkan S, Calıskan E, Doger E, Yucesoy I, Ozeren S, Vural B. 2009. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 280:19–24.
- Pennell CE, Henderson JJ, O’Neill MJ, McChlery S, Doherty DA, Dickinson JE et al. 2009. Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2 gel. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 116:1443–1452.
- Rath W. 2005. A clinical evaluation of controlled-release dinoprostone for cervical ripening-a review of current evidence in hospital and outpatient settings. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 33:491–499.
- RCOG. 2008. Induction of labour. Evidence-based Clinical Guideline No. 9. London: RCOG Clinical Support Unit.
- Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. 2013. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 21:CD004667.
- Sutcliffe K, Caird J, Kavanagh J, Rees R, Oliver K, Dickson K et al. 2012. Comparing midwife-led and doctor-led maternity care: a systematic review of reviews. Journal of Advanced Nursing 68:376–2386.
- Tathem K, Harris LJ, O’Rourke P, Kimble RM. 2012. Dinoprostone vaginal pessary for induction of labour: Safety of use for up to 24 h. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 52:582–587.