A Novel Method for Evaluating the Acrosomal Status of Mammalian Spermatozoa

References

• Yanagimachi R. Mammalian Fertilization in the Physiology of Reproduction, E Knobie, J D Neil. Raven, New York 1994; Vol 1: 189–318
   Google Scholar
• Tesarik J, Mendoza C, Carreras A. Fast acrosome reaction measure: a highly sensitive method for evaluating stimulus-induced acrosome reaction. Fertil Steril 1993; 59: 424–430
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cross N L, Meizel S. Methods for evaluating the acrosomal status of mammalian sperm. Biol Reprod 1989; 41: 635–641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross N L, Morales P, Overstreet J W, Hanson F W. Two simple methods for detecting acrosome reacted human sperm. Gamete Res 1986; 15: 213–226
   Google Scholar
• Mendoza C, Carreras A, Moos J, Tesarik J. Distinction between true acrosome reaction and degenerative acrosome loss by a one-step staining method using Pisum sativum agglutinin. J Reprod Fertil 1992; 95: 755–763
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cross N L, Morales P, Fukuda M, Behboody E. Determining acrosomal status of the cynomolyus monkey (Macaca fascicularis) sperm by fluorescence microscopy. Am J Primatol 1989; 17: 157–163
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Casey P J, Hillman R B, Robertson K R, Yudin A I, Liu I KM, Drobnis E-Z. Validation of an acrosomal stain for equine sperm that differentiates between living and dead sperm. J Androl 1993; 14: 289–297
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morales P, Cross N L. A new procedure for determining acrosomal status of very small numbers of human sperm. J Histochem Cytochem 1989; 37: 1291–1292
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mortimer D, Curtis E F, Miller R G. Specific labelling by peanut agglutinin of the outer acrosomal membrane of the human spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil 1987; 81: 127–135
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aitken R J, Buckingham D W, Fang H G. Analysis of the response of human spermatozoa to A23187 employing a novel technique for assessing the acrosome reaction. J Androl 1993; 14: 132–141
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gearon C M, Mortimer D, Chapman M G, Forman R G. Artificial induction of the acrosome reaction in human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 77–82
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holden C A, Hyne R V, Sathananthan A H, Trounson A O. Assessment of the human sperm acrosome reaction using concanavalin A lectin. Mol Reprod Dev 1990; 25: 247–257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talbot P, Chacon R. A new procedure for rapidly scoring acrosome reactions of human sperm. Gamete Res 1980; 3: 211–216
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel L K, Franken D R, Der Horst G V, Kruger T F. Fluorescein isothiocyanate conjugate: wheat germ agglutinin staining of human spermatozoa and fertilization in vitro. Fertil Steril 1995; 63: 894–901
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolf D P, Boldt J, Byrd W, Bechtol K B. Acrosomal status evaluation in human ejaculated sperm with monoclonal antibodies. Biol Reprod 1985; 32: 1157–1162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrd W, Wolf D P. Acrosomal status in fresh and capacitated human ejaculated sperm. Biol Reprod 1986; 34: 859–869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez R, Toepfer-Petersen E, Aitken R J, Schill W B. A new method for evaluation of the acrosome reaction in viable human spermatozoa. Andrologia 1991; 23: 197–203
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ohashi K, Sagi F, Kato M, Tsutsui T, Tomiyama T, Tanizawa O. Acrobeads test: a new diagnostic test for assessment of the fertilizing capacity of human spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 1995; 63: 625–630
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braun S, Hirsch T, Krause W, Ziegler A. Evaluation of the acrosome reaction using monoclonal antibodies against different acrosomal antigens: comparison with the triple stain method. Int J Androl 1991; 14: 431–436
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Talbot P, Chacon R S. A triple-stain technique for evaluating normal acrosome reactions of human sperm. J Exp Zool 1981; 215: 201–208
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harayama H, Kusunoki H, Kato S. Capacity of goat epididymal spermatozoa to undergo the subsequent fusion with the egg plasma membrane. Reprod Fertil Dev 1993; 5: 239–246
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Didion B A, Dobrinsky J R, Giles J R, Graves C N. Staining procedure to detect viability and the true acrosome reaction in spermatozoa of various species. Gamete Res 1989; 22: 51–57
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aarons D, Boettger-Tong H, Biegler B, George B, Poirier G R. The acrosomal status of human sperm evaluated by Coomassie blue staining and electron microscopy. Mol Androl 1993; 5: 31–37
   Google Scholar
• Kholkute S D, Lian Y, Roudebush W E, Dukelow W R. Capacitation and the acrosome reaction in squirrel monkey (Shimiri sciureus) spermatozoa evaluated by the chlortetracycline fluorescence assay. Am J Primatol 1990; 20: 115–125
   Google Scholar
• Kholkute S D, Meherji P, Puri C P. Capacitation and the acrosome reaction in sperm from men with various semen profiles monitored by a chlortetracycline fluorescence assay. Int J Androl 1992; 15: 43–53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Leeuw A M, Den Daas J HG, Woelders H. The fix vital stain method simultaneous determination of viability and acrosomal status of bovine spermatozoa. J Androl 1991; 12: 112–118
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kovacs A, Foote R H. Viability and acrosome staining of bull, boar and rabbit spermatozoa. Biotechnic Histochem 1992; 67: 119–124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenichel P, Hsi B L, Farahifar D, Donzeau M, Barrier-Delpech D, Yeh C JG. Evaluation of the human sperm acrosome reaction using a monoclonal antibody, GB24 and fluorescence-activated cell sorter. J Reprod Fertil 1989; 87: 699–706
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tao J, Du J, Crister E S, Crister J K. Assessment of the acrosomal status and viability of human spermatozoa simultaneously using flow cytometry. Human Reprod 1993; 8: 1879–1885
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tao J, Crister E S, Crister J K. Evaluation of mouse sperm acrosomal status and viability by flow cytometry. Mol Reprod Dev 1993; 36: 183–194
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henley N, Baron C, Roberts K D. Flow cytometric evaluation of the acrosome reaction of human spermatozoa: a new method using a photoactivated supravital stain. Int J Androl 1994; 17: 78–84
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ben Av P, Rubinstein S, Breitbart H. Induction of acrosomal reaction and calcium uptake in ram spermatozoa by ionophores. Biochim Biophys Acta 1988; 939: 214–222
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laemmli D K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacterioph-age T4. Nature 1970; 227: 680–685
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrish S S, Susko-Parrish J L, Winer M A, First N. Incapacitation of bovine sperm by heparin. Biol Reprod 1988; 38: 1171–1180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown C R, Hartree E E. Studies on ram acrosin: activation of proacrosin accompanying the isolation of acrosin from spermatozoa, and purification of the enzyme by affinity chromatography. Biochem J 1978; 175: 227–238
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noland T D, David L S, Olson G E. Regulation of proacrosin conversion in isolated guinea pig sperm acrosomal apical segments. J Biol Chem 1989; 264: 13586–13590
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hardy D M, Orda M N, Friend D J, Huang T F. A mechanism for differential release of acroso-mal enzymes during the acrosome reaction. Biochem J 1991; 275: 759–766
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baba T, Niida Y, Michikawa Y, Kashiwabara S, Kodaira K, Tekenaka M, Kohno N, Garton G L, Arai Y. An acrosomal protein Sp32 in mammalian sperm is a binding protein specific for two proacrosins and an acrosin intermediate. J Biol Chem 1994; 269: 10133–10140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adeniran A J, Shoshani I, Minuth M, Awad J A, Elce J S, Johnson R A. Purification, characterization and N-terminal amino acid sequence of the adenylyl cyclase-activating protease from bovine sperm. Biol Reprod 1995; 52: 490–499
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moos J, Tesarik J, Leca G, Peknicova J. Mechanism of maturation, and nature of carbohydrate chains of boar sperm acrosin. FEBS Lett 1991; 294: 27–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schleuning W D, Fritz H. Sperm acrosin. Methods Enzymol 1976; 45: 330–342
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cross N L. Methods for evaluating the acrosomal status of human sperm. Human Sperm Acrosome Reaction, P Fenichel, S Parinaud. Colloque INSERM/John Libbey Eurotext Ltd. 1995; 277–285
   Google Scholar
• Calvo L, Vantman D, Banks S M, Tezon J, Koukoulis G N, Dennison L, Sherins R J. Follicular fluid-induced acrosome reaction distinguishes a subgroup of men with unexplained infertility not identified by semen analysis. Fertil Steril 1989; 52: 1048–1054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pampiglione J S, Tan S L, Campbell S. The use of the stimulated acrosome reaction test as a test of fertilizing ability in human spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 1993; 59: 1280–1284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins S M, Permer S M, Seguier A M, Yovich J L, Hartmann P E. A test of the human sperm acrosome reaction following ionophore challenge: relationship to fertility and other seminal parameters. J Androl 1991; 12: 98–103
   PubMedGoogle Scholar