Assessment of the Relationship of Sperm Morphology with Seminal and Other Clinical Conditions of Semen Donors

References

• Adelman M M, Cahill E M. Atlas of Sperm Morphology. ASCP, Chicago 1989
   Google Scholar
• Ali J I, Grimes E M. Sperm morphology: unstained and stained smears in fertile and infertile men. Arch Androl 1988; 22: 191–195
   Google Scholar
• Armitage P. Multiple Regression in Groups in Statistical Methods in Medical Research. Blackwell Scientific, OxfordUK 1971
   Google Scholar
• Baker H G, Clarke G N. Sperm morphology: consistency of assessment of the same sperm by different observers. Clin Reprod Fertil 1987; 5: 37–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blasco L. Clinical tests of sperm fertilizing ability. Modern Trends in Infertility and Conception Control, E E Wallach, R D Kempers. Year Book Medical, Chicago 1984; 436–450
   Google Scholar
• Davis R O, Gravance C G, Overstreet J W. A standardized test for visual analysis of human sperm morphology. Fertil Steril 1995; 63: 1058–1063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasson R. Standards for investigation of human semen. Andrologia 1971; 3: 49–64
   Google Scholar
• Giblin P T, Moghissi K S, Ager J W, Olson J M. Effects of stress and characteristic adaptability on semen quality in healthy men. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 127–132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustavo F G, Zapana M. Sperm motility should be assessed in fresh sperm and after a sperm washing procedure. Arch Androl 1992; 28: 83–89
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gwatkin R BL. Genes in Mammalian Reproduction. Wiley-Liss, New York 1993
   Google Scholar
• Holzki G, Gall H, Hermann J. Cigarette smoking and sperm quality. Andrologia 1991; 23: 141–144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain A M, Helvacioglu A, Huff C, Yeoman R, Aksel S. Pattern of changes in motility, vitality and morphology of human sperm in different in vitro segments of the ejaculate. Mol Androl 1995; 7: 13–19
   Google Scholar
• Jeulin C, Feneux D, Serres C, Frydman R, Testart J. Sperm factors related to failure of human in vitro fertilization. J Reprod Fertil 1986; 76: 735–744
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• The Physiology of Reproduction, Vol 1, 2d ed, E Knobil, J D Neil. Raven, Philadelphia, PA 1994
   Google Scholar
• Kruger T F, Acosta A A, Simmons K F, Swanson R J, Matta J F, Oehninger S. Predictive value of abnormal morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 112–117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger T F, Acosta A A, Simmons K F, Matta J F, Veeck L L. New method of evaluating sperm morphology with predictive value for in vitro fertilization. Urology 1987; 30: 248–251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu D Y, Baker H W. Relationships between human sperm acrosin, acrosomes, morphology and fertilization in vitro. Hum Reprod 1990; 5: 298–303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahadevan M M, Trounson A O. The influence of seminal characteristics on the success rate of human in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1984; 42: 400–405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menkveld R, Stander F H, Kotze T V, Kruger T F. The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria. Hum Reprod 1990; 15: 586–592
   Google Scholar
• Mladenovic I, Genbachev O, Marinkovic B. Sperm morphology and motility in different age populations. Arch Androl 1994; 32: 197–205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortimer D. Practical Laboratory Andrology. Oxford University Press, Sydney 1994
   Google Scholar
• Naftulin B N, Samuel S J, Hellstorm W J, Lewis E L, Overstreet J W. Semen quality in varicocele patients is characterized by tapered sperm cells. Fertil Steril 1991; 56: 149–151
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ochedalski T, Lachowicz A, Ozechowski B. Evaluating the effect of smoking tobacco on some semen parameters in men of reproductive age. Ginekol Pol 1994; 65: 80–86
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-Cervical Mucus Interaction, 2d ed. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeUK 1992
   Google Scholar
• Zaini A, Jennings M G, Baker H G. Are conventional sperm morphology and motility assessments of predictive value in subfertile men?. Int J Androl 1985; 8: 427–135
   PubMedGoogle Scholar