Preconceptional Sex Selection: Past, Present, and Future

References

• Amann R P. Treatment of sperm to predetermine sex. Theriogenology 1989; 31: 49–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashwood-Smith M J. Human sperm selection: safety of human sperm selection by flow cytometry. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 757
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beernink F J, Dmowski W P, Ericsson R J. Sex preselection through albumin separation of sperm. Fertil Steril 1993; 59: 382–386
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blottner S, Bostedt H, Mewes K, Pitria C. Enrichment of bovine X and Y spermatozoa by free-flow electrophoresis. Zentralbl-Veterinarmed 1994; 41: 466–474
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brandriff B F, Gordon L A, Moore D H, Gledhill B L. Sex chromosome ratios determined by karyotypic analysis in albumin-isolated human sperm. Fertil Steril 1986; 46: 678–684
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carson S A. Sex selection: the ultimate in family planning. Fertil Steril 1988; 50: 16–19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chevret E, Rousseaux S, Monteil M, Cozzi J, Pelletier R, Mallard J, Sele B. Male meiotic segregation of gonosomes analyzed by two color FISH in human interphase spermatozoa. Hum Genet 1994; 94: 701–704
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coale A J, Banister J. Five decades of missing females in china. Demography 1994; 31: 459–479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corson S L, Batzer F R, Alexander N J, Schlaff S, Otis C. Sex selection by sperm separation and insemination. Fertil Steril 1984; 42: 756–760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cran D G, Johnson L A. The predetermination of embryonic sex, using flow cytometrically separated X and Y spermatozoa. Human Reprod 1996; 2: 355–363
   Google Scholar
• Cui K. Size differences between human X and Y spermatozoa and prefertilization diagnosis. Mol Hum Reprod 1997; 3: 61–67
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dawson K, Trounson A. Ethics of sex selection for family balancing. Why balance families? Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 2577–2578
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dickey R P, Taylor S N, Curloe D N, Rye P H. Male birth rates are influenced by the insemination of unselected spermatozoa and not by clomiphene citrate. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 761–762
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edwards R G, Beard H K. Sexing human spermatozoa to control sex ratios at birth is now a reality. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 977–978
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Egozcue J. Sex selection: why not?. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 1777
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ericsson R J, Langevin C N, Nishino M. Isolation of fractions rich in human Y sperm. Nature 1973; 246: 421–425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson R J, Glass R H. Functional differences between sperm bearing the X- and Y-chromosome. Prospects for Sexing Mammalian Sperm, R P Amann, G E Seidel. Colorado Assoc. Univ. Press, Boulder 1982; 201–211
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson R J. Sex selection via albumin columns: 20 years of results. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 1787–1788
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ericsson R J. Validity of X and Y sperm separation techniques. Fertil Steril 1994; 62: 1286–1288
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evans J M, Douglas T A, Renton J P. An attempt to separate fractions rich in human Y sperm. Nature 1975; 253: 352–354
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flaherty S P, Mathews C D. Application of modern molecular techniques to evaluate sperm sex selection methods. Mol Hum Reprod 1996; 2: 937–942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foote R H, Miller J. Normal development of fetuses resulting from Holstein semen processed for sex separation. Theriogenology 1971; 24: 197–202
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel I k, Franken D R, Van der Horst G, Kruger T F. Fluorescein isothiocyanate conjugate-wheat germ agglutinin staining of human spermatozoa and fertilization in vitro. Fertil Steril 1995; 63: 894–901
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gledhill B L. Control of mammalian sex by sexing sperm. Fertil Steril 1983; 40: 572–574
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gledhill B L, Edwards R G. Can spermatozoa be typed?. Preconception and Preimplantation Diagnosis of Human Genetic Disease, R G Edwards. Cambridge Univ. Press, CambridgeUK 1993; 203–231
   Google Scholar
• Goldman A SH, Fomina Z, Knights P A, Hill C J, Walker A P, Hulten M A. Analysis of the primary sex ratio, sex chromosome aneuploidy and diploidy in human sperm using dual-color fluorescence in situ hybridization. Eur J Hum Genet 1993; 1: 325–334
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodall H, Roberts A M. Differences in motility of human X- and Y-bearing spermatozoa. J Reprod Fert 1976; 48: 433–436
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Griffin D K, Handyside A H, Penketh R JA, Winston R ML, Delhanty J DA. Fluorescent in-situ hybridization to interphase nuclei of human preimplantation embryos with X and Y chromosome specific probes. Hum Reprod 1991; 6: 101–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grazi R V, Wolowelsky J B, Jewelewicz R. Assisted reproduction in contemporary Jewish law and ethics. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1994; 37: 217–225
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grifo J A, Boyle A, Fischer E, Lavy G, DeCherney A H, Ward D C, Sanyal M K. Preembryo biopsy analysis of blastomeres by in situ hybridization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 2013–2019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handyside A H, Kontogianni E H, Hardy K, Winston R ML. Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature 1990; 344: 768–770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han T L, Ford J H, Webb G C, Flaherty S P, Mathews C D. Simultaneous detection of X- and Y-bearing human sperm by double flourescence in situ hybridization. Mol Reprod Dev 1993; 34: 308–313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hook E B. Prenatal sex selection and autonomous reproductive decision. Lancet 1994; 343: 55–56
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hossain A M, Rizk B, Yeoman R, Thorneycroft I H. Modified guanidinium thiocyanate method is ideal for human sperm DNA preparation to be used for the evaluation of the X and Y composition of the sperm population. J Androl (Suppl) 1996; 21: 48–49
   Google Scholar
• Ishijima S A, Okuno M, Mohri T, Mohri H. Separation of X- and Y-chromosome bearing murine sperm by free flow electrophoresis: evaluation of separation using PCR. Zoolog Sci 1992; 9: 601–606
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson L A, Flook J P, Look M V, Pinkel D. Flow sorting of X and Y chromosome-bearing spermatozoa into two populations. Gamete Res 1987; 16: 1–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson L A, Clarke R N. Flow sorting of X and Y chromosome bearing mammalian sperm: activation and pronuclear development of sorted bull, boar and ram sperm microinjected into hamster oocytes. Gamete Res 1988; 21: 335–543
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson L A. Gender preselection in domestic animals using flow cytometrically sorted sperm. J Anim Sci (Suppl. 2) 1992; 70: 8–18
   Google Scholar
• Johnson L A, Welch G R, Fugger E F, Schulman J D. Gender preselection in humans? Flow cytometric separation of X and Y spermatozoa for the prevention of X-linked diseases. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 1733–1739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson L A, Schulman J D. The safety of sperm selection by flow cytometry. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 758–759
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson L A. Sex preselection by flow cytometric separation of X and Y chromosome-bearing sperm based on DNA difference: a review. Reprod Fertil Dev 1995; 7: 893–903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judson O P. Demography: killing the sex ratio. Nature 1994; 372: 503–504
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaneko S, Yamaguchi J, Kobayashi T, Iizuka R. Separation of X- and Y-bearing sperm using Percoll density gradient centrifugation. Fertil Steril 1983; 40: 661–669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaneko S, Oshio S, Kobayashi T, Mohri H. Human X- and Y-bearing sperm differ in cell surface sialic acid content. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1984; 124: 950–955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooij R J, Oost B A. Determination of sex ratio of spermatozoa with a deoxyribonucleic acid-probe and quinacrine staining: a comparison. Fertil Steril 1992; 58: 384–386
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kruger T F, Acosta A A, Simmons K F, Oehninger S. Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 112–117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krzanowski M. Dependence of primary and secondary sex ratio on the rapidity of sedimentation of bull sperm. J Reprod Fertil 1970; 23: 11–20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kumar T C. Gender pre-selection: prevention or perpetuation of female deaths. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 1319
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laland K, Kumm J, Feldman M W. Medical ethics and human reproduction: scientists predict unbalanced future with sex selection. BMJ 1994; 308: 536
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levin R J. Human sex preselection. Oxford Rev Reprod Biol 1987; 9: 161–191
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levinson G, Keyvanfar Wu JC, et al. DNA-based X-enriched sperm separation as an adjunct to preimplantation genetic testing for the prevention of X-linked disease. Human Reprod 1995; 10: 979–982
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Cui X, Arnheim N. Direct electrophoretic detection of the allelic state of single DNA molecules in human sperm by using the PCR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87: 4580–4584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Tuck-Muller C M, Yan Q, Wertelecki W, Chen H. A rapid method for PCR amplification of DNA directly from cells fixed in Carnoy's fixative. Am Med Genet 1995; 55: 116–119
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lilford R J. Sex selection—ethical issues. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 762–764
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu J, Lissens W, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A, Liebaers I. Amplification of X and Y chromosome-specific regions from single human blastomeres by PCR for sexing of preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 716–720
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lobel S M, Pomponio R J, Mutter G L. The sex ratio of normal and manipulated human sperm quantitated by the polymerase chain reaction. Fertil Steril 1993; 59: 387–392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez O, Mata A, Antich M, Bassas L. Sperm selection by PD-10 sephadex columns: comparison with Spermprep filtration and Percoll centrifugation. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 732–736
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McNutt T L, Johnson L A. Flow cytometric sorting of sperm: influence on fertilization and embryo/fetal development in the rabbit. Mol Reprod Dev 1996; 43: 261–267
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mittwoch U. Blastocysts prepare for the race to be male. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 1550–1555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrell J M, Keeler K D, Noakes D E, Mackenzie N M, Dresser D W. Sexing of sperm by flow cytometry. Vet Rec 1988; 122: 322–324
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Munne S, Weier H U, Stein J, Grifo J, Cohen J. A fast and efficient method for simultaneous X and Y in situ hybridization of human blastomeres. J Assisted Reprod Genet 1993; 10: 82–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munne S. Flow cytometric separation of X and Y spermatozoa could be detrimental for human embryos. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 758
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quinlivan W LG, Preciado K, Long T, Sullivan H. Separation of human X and Y spermatozoa by albumin gradients and sephadex chromatography. Fertil Steril 1982; 37: 104–107
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rank K, McManus T P, Ginsberg L C, Ficsor G. Preparation of mouse-sperm DNA for PCR. Mutat Res 1991; 264: 67–69
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roberts A M. Gravitational separation of X and Y spermatozoa. Nature 1972; 238: 223–225
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rohde W, Porstmann T, Prehn S, Dorner G. Gravitational pattern of the Y-bearing human spermatozoa in density gradient centrifugation. J Reprod Fertil 1975; 42: 587–591
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ross A, Robinson J A, Evans H J. Failure to confirm separation of X- and Y-bearing human sperm using BSA gradients. Nature 1975; 253: 354–355
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sarkar S. Motility, expression of surface antigen, and X and Y human sperm separation in in vitro fertilization medium. Fertil Steril 1984; 42: 899–905
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schilling E, Lafrenz R, Klobassa F. Failure to separate human X and Y chromosome bearing spermatozoa by Sephadex gel-filtration. Andrologia 1978; 10: 215–219
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schulman J D. Ethical issues in gender selection by X/Y sperm separation. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 1541–1542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidel G E, Amann R P. In Prospects for Sexing Mammalian Sperm, R P Amann, G E Seidel. Colorado Assoc. Univ. Press, Boulder 1982
   Google Scholar
• Shastry P R, Hedge U C, Rao S S. Use of Ficoll-sodium metrizoate density gradient to separate human X- And Y-bearing sperm. Nature 1977; 269: 58–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shenfield F. Sex selection: a matter for ‘Fancy’ or for ethical debate?. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 569–570
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shushan A, Schenker J G. Prenatal sex determination and selection. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 1545–1549
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sofikitis N, Miyagawa I, Zavos P M. Selection of single-stranded DNA spermatozoa via the spermprep filtration column. Fertil Steril 1993; 59: 690–692
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spriggs E L, Rademaker A W, Martin R H. Aneuploidy in human sperm: results of two- and three-color fluoresence in situ hybridization using centromeric probes for chromosomes 1, 12, 15, 18, X, and Y. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1995; 71: 47–53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steeno O, Adimoelja A, Steeno J. Separation of X and Y bearing human spermatozoa with the Sephadex gelfiltration method. Andrologia 1975; 7: 95–98
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sumner A T, Robinson J A. A difference in dry mass between the heads of X- and Y-bearing human spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil 1976; 48: 9–15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sumner A T, Clarke J A. A difference in dry mass between the heads of X- and Y-bearing human spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil 1986; 48: 9–15
   Google Scholar
• Tucker M, Wiker S, Massey J. Rational approach to assisted fertilization. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 1778
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Steirteghem A C, Liu J, Toris H, Nagy Z, Toumaye H, Derde M P, Van Asche E, Devroey P. Higher success rate by ICSI than by SUZI: report on a second series of 300 consecutive treatment cycles. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 1055–1080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vleit R A, Verrinder A M, Gibbons A M, Walton J S. Livestock embryo sexing: a review of current methods, with emphasis on Y-specific DNA probes. Theriogenology 1989; 32: 421–438
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Veit C R, Jewelewicz R. Gender preselection: facts and myths. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 937–940
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vidal F, Moragas M, Egozcue J, Veiga A. Sephadex filtration and human serum albumin gradients do not select spermatozoa by sex chromosome: a fluorescent in-situ hybridization study. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 1740–1743
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang H X, Flaherty S P, Swann N J, Mathews C D. Discontinuous Percoll gradients enrich X-bearing human spermatozoa: a study using double-label fluoresence in situ hybridization. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 1265–1270
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang H X. Assessment of the separation of X and Y bearing sperm on albumin gradients using double-label fluoresence in situ hybridization. Fertil Steril 1994; 61: 720–726
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Westoff C F, Rindfuss R R. Sex preselection in the United States: some implications. Science 1974; 184: 633–636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams B J, Ballenger C A, Malter H E, Bishop F, Hassold T J. Non-disjunction in human sperm: results of fluoresence in situ hybridization studies using two and three probes. Hum Mol Genet 1993; 2: 1929–1936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windsor D P, Evans G, White I G. Sex predetermination by separation of X and Y chromosome-bearing sperm: a review. Reprod Fertil Dev 1993; 5: 155–171
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen-Cervical Mucus Interaction. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeUK 1992
   Google Scholar
• Zarutskie P W, Muller C H, Magone M, Soules M R. The clinical relevance of sex selection techniques. Fertil Steril 1989; 52: 891–906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zech L. Investigation of metaphase chromosomes with DNA binding fluorochromes. Exp Cell Res 1969; 58: 463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar