References
- Barton M, Walker K, Wiesner BP. Artificial insemination. Br Med J 1945; 1: 40–3
- Brewaeys A. Donor insemination, the impact on family and child development. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 1996; 17: 1–13
- Lalos O, Innala E, Lalos A, et al. Sperma- donatorerna fler och graviditetsfrekvensen högre [Sperm donors in Umea after 1985; increased number of sperm donors and higher pregnancy rate]. Lakarridningen 1998; 95: 5636–8
- Hock SC. The controversy surrounding privacy or disclosure among donor gamete recipients. J Assist Reprod Genet 1997; 14: 378–80
- Shenfield F. Privacy versus disclosure in gamete donation: a clash of interest, of duties or an exercise in responsibility. J Assist Reprod Genet 1997; 14: 371–3
- Milsom I, Bergman P. A study of parental attitudes after donor insemination. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1982; 61: 125–8
- Gottlieb C, Lalos O, Lindblad F. Disclosure of donor insemination to the child: the impact of Swedish legislation on couples' attitudes. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 2052–6
- Svensk Förfatringssamling 1984; 1140, Swedish law - formal statute
- Daniels K, Lewis G, Gillet W. Telling donor insemination offspring about their conception: the nature of couples* decision making. Soc Sci Med 1996; 9: 1213–20
- Strauss A, Corbin J. Open coding. Basics of Qualitative Research2nd edn., A Strauss, J Corbin. Sage, Thousand Oaks 1998; 101–21
- Nachtigall R D, Tschann J M, Szkupinski Quiroga S, et al. Stigma, disclosure, and family functioning among parents of children conceived through donor insemination. Fertil Steril 1997; 68: 83–9
- Cook R, Golombok S, Bish A. Disclosure of donor insemination: parental attitudes. Am J Orthopsychiatr 1995; 65: 540–59
- Daniels K, Taylor K. Secrecy and openness in donor insemination. Pol Life Sci 1993; 12: 155–70
- Rumball A, Adair V. Telling the story: parents' scripts for donor offspring. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 1392–9
- Braverman A M, Boxer A S, Corson S L, et al. Characteristics and attitudes of parents of children born with the use of assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril 1998; 70: 860–5
- Jacob M C, Klock S C, Maier D. Lesbian couples as therapeutic donor insemination recipients: do they differ from other patients?. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 1999; 20: 203–15
- LeLannou D, Thepot F, Jouannet P. Multicentre approaches to donor insemination in the French CECOS Federation: nationwide evaluation, donor matching, screening for genetic diseases and consanguinity. Hum Reprod 1998; 1335–49
- Landau R. The management of genetic origins: secrecy and openness in donor assisted conception in Israel and elsewhere. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 3268–73
- Klock S C, Maier D. Psychological factors related to donor insemination. Fertil Steril 1991; 56: 489–95
- Brewaeys A, Golombok S, Naaktgeboren N, et al. Donor insemination: Dutch parents' opinions about confidentiality and donor anonymity and the emotional adjustment of their children. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 1591–7
- Nachtigall RD. Secrecy: an unresolved issue in the practice of donor insemination. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168: 1846–53
- Svensson O. Differentiation and consolidation theory of human decision making: a frame of reference for the study of pre- and post-decision processes. Acta Psychol 1992; 80: 143–68