Differences in preferences for obstetric care between nulliparae and their partners in the Netherlands: a discrete-choice experiment

References

• Central Bureau of Statistics2009.
   Google Scholar
• Stichting Perinatale Registratie Nederland. Perinatale Zorg in Nederland 2006. Utrecht: Stichting Perinatale Registratie Nederland; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlova M, Hendrix M, Nouwens E, Nijhuis J, van Merode G. The choice of obstetric care by low-risk pregnant women in the Netherlands: implications for policy and management. Health Policy 2009;93:27–34.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries RG. A pleasing birth: midwives and maternity care in the Netherlands. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Hulst LAM, van Teijlingen ER, Bonsel GJ, Eskes M, Bleker OP. Does a pregnant's woman intended place of birth influence her attitudes toward and occurrence of obstetric interventions? Birth 2004;31:28–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony S, Buitendijk SE, Offerhaus PM, Dommelen P, van der Pal-de Bruin KM. Maternal factors and the probability of a planned home birth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2005;112:748–753.
   Google Scholar
• Kind E. Thuis of in het ziekenhuis? Welke reden zijn voor de cliënt bepalend voor de keuze? Tijdschrift voor Verloskundigen 2000;25:110–115.
   Google Scholar
• Kleiverda G, Steen AM, Andersen I, Treffers PE, Everaerd W. Place of delivery in the Netherlands: maternal motives and background variables related to preference for home or hospital confinement. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1990;39:139–146.
   Google Scholar
• Manshanden JCP. De keuze van de nulliparae; wanneer, waarom? Tijdschrift voor Verloskundigen 1997;22:34–40.
   Google Scholar
• Wiegers T, Van der Zee J, Kerssens J, Keirse M. Home birth or short-stay hospital birth in a low-risk population in the Netherlands. Soc Sci Med 1998;46:1505–1511.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bloom JR. The relationship of social support and health. Soc Sci Med 1990;30:635–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuckolls KB, Kaplan HB, Cassel J. Psychosocial assets, life crisis and the prognosis of pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol 1972;95:431–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez A, Bohlin G, Lindmark G. Symptoms across pregnancy. Gynecol Scand 2001;80:213–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Romito P, Ancel PY, Lelong N. Unemployment and psychological distress one year after childbirth in France. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000;54:185–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjerdingen DK, Froberg DG, Fontaine P. The effects of social support on women's health during pregnancy, labor and delivery, and the postpartum period. Fam Med 1991;23:370–375.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Webster J, Linnane JW, Dibley LM, Pritchard M. Improving antenatal recognition of women at risk for postnatal depression. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 2000;40:409–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarkka MT, Paunonen M. Social support and its impact on mothers' experiences of childbirth. J Adv Nurs 1996;23:70–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ip WY. Relationships between partner's support during labour and maternal outcomes. J Clin Nurs 2000;9:265–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berghs G, Spanjaard E. De normale zwangerschap: Bevalling en beleid. Nijmegen: Universiteit van Nijmegen; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Mottram L. First-time expectant fathers and their influence on decision making regarding choice for place of birth. Midwifery Digest 2008;18:582–589.
   Google Scholar
• Capogna G, Camorcia M, Stirparo S. Expectant fathers' experience during labor with or without epidural analgesia. Int J Obstet Anesth 2007;16:110–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldenström U, Hildingsson I, Rubertsson C, Rådestad I. A negative birth experience: prevalence and risk factors in a national sample. Birth 2004;31:17–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hundley V, Ryan M, Graham W. Assessing women's preferences for intrapartum care. Birth 2001;28:254–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longworth L, Ratcliffe J, Boulton M. Investigating women's preferences for intrapartum care: home versus hospital births. Health Soc Care Community 2001;9:404–413.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ryan M, Farrar S. Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. BMJ 2000;320:1530–1533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan M, Hughes J. Using conjoint analysis to assess women's preferences for miscarriage management. Health Econ 1997;6:261–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe J, Van Haselen R, Buxton M, Hardy K, Colehan J, Partridge M. Assessing patients' preferences for characteristics associated with homeopathic and conventional treatment of asthma: a conjoint analysis study. Thorax 2002;57:503–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan M. Using conjoint analysis to take account of patient preferences and go beyond health outcomes: an application to in vitro fertilization. Soc Sci Med 1999;48:535–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan M, Gerard K. Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2003;2:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Permain D, Swanson J, Kroes E, Bradley M. Stated preference techniques. A guide to practice. The Hague, the Netherlands: Steer, Davis, Gleave and Hague Consulting Group; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Hundley V, Ryan M. Are women's expectations and preferences for intrapartum care affected by the model of care on offer? BJOG 2004;111:550–560.
   Google Scholar
• Muyskens J, Kenens RJ, Hingstman L. Cijfers uit de registratie van verloskundigen-peiling 2006. Utrecht: Nivel; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Lancsar E, Louviere J. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user's guide. PharmacoEconomics 2008;26:661–677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Propper C. The disutility of time spent on the United Kingdom's National Health Service waiting lists. J Hum Resour 1995;30:677–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamble J, Creedy DK, Teakle B. Women's expectations of maternity services: a community-based survey. Women Birth 2007;20:115–120.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodman P, Mackey MC, Tavakoli AS. Factors related to childbirth satisfaction. J Adv Nurs 2004;46:212–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodnett ED. Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:160–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draper J. Whose welfare in the labour room? A discussion of the increasing trend of fathers' birth attendance. Midwifery 1997;13:132–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson C, Westman G, Hamberg K. Content of childbirth-related fear in Swedish women and men – analysis of an open-ended question. J Midwifery Womens Health 2006;51:112–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somers-Smith MJ. A place for the father? Expectations and experiences of support during childbirth. Midwifery 1999;15:101–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh R, Slade P, Spiby H. Fathers' coping style, antenatal preparation, and experiences of labor and the postpartum. Birth 2000;27:177–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols MR. Paternal perspectives of the childbirth experience. Mat Child Nurs J 1993;21:99–108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hallgren A, Kihlgren M, Forslin L, Norberg A. Swedish fathers' involvement in and experiences of childbirth preparation and childbirth. Midwifery 1999;15:6–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Liukkonen A. Fathers' experiences of childbirth. Midwifery 1998;14:10–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nolan M. Caring for fathers in antenatal classes. Modern Midwife 1994;4:25–28.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan M, McIntosch E, Shackley P. Methodological issues in the application of conjoint analysis in health care. Health Econ 1998;7:373–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiaens W, Bracke P. Assessment of social psychological determinants of satisfaction with childbirth in a cross-national perspective. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2007;7:26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Green JM. Expectations and experiences of pain in labor: findings from a large prospective study. Birth 1993;20:65–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar