Cross-border reproductive services – suggestions for ethically based minimum standards of care in Europe

References

• Pennings G, de Wert G, Shenfield F, Cohen J, Tarlatzis B, Devroey P. ESHRE task force on ethics and law 15: cross-border reproductive care. Hum Reprod 2008;23:2182–2184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorn P Reproduktives Reisen - eine Expertise für den Pro Familia Bundesverband. Pro Familia Bundesverband, Frankfurt 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Inhorn MC, Patrizio P. Rethinking reproductive “tourism” as reproductive “exile”. Fertil Steril 2009;92:904–906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth E. Fertility patients’ experiences of cross - border reproductive care. Fertil Steril 2010;94:e11–e15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainland L, Wilson E. Principles of establishment of the First International Forum on Cross-Border Reproductive Care. Fertil Steril 2010;94:e1–e3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nygren K, Adamson D, Zegers-Hochschild F, de Mouzon J; International Committee Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Cross-border fertility care – International Committee Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies global survey: 2006 data and estimates. Fertil Steril 2010;94:e4–e10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins J, Cook J. Cross-border reproductive care: now and into the future. Fertil Steril 2010;94:e25–e26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorn P, Dill S. The role of patients’ organizations in cross-border reproductive care. Fertil Steril 2010;94:e23–e24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes EG, Dejean D. Cross-border fertility services in North America: a survey of Canadian and American providers. Fertil Steril 2010;94:e16–e19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies T. Cross-border reproductive care: quality and safety challenges for the regulator. Fertil Steril 2010;94:e20–e22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shenfield F, de Mouzon J, Pennings G, Ferraretti AP, Andersen AN, de Wert G, Goossens V; ESHRE Taskforce on Cross Border Reproductive Care. Cross border reproductive care in six European countries. Hum Reprod 2010;25:1361–1368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haase J. A survey of the experiences and perspectives of counselors. ASRM Annual Meeting, 2009 Oct 17; Atlanta, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Culley L, Hudson N, Rapport F, Blyth E, Norton W, Pacey AA. Crossing borders for fertility treatment: motivations, destinations and outcomes of UK fertility travellers. Hum Reprod 2011;26:2373–2381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reprod Biomed Online, 2011, Volume 23. Symposium: Cross-Border Reproductive Care – Ethical, Legal, and Socio-Cultural Perspectives (Special issue).
   Google Scholar
• McKelvey A, David AL, Shenfield F, Jauniaux ER. The impact of cross-border reproductive care or ‘fertility tourism’ on NHS maternity services. BJOG 2009;116:1520–1523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Mouzon J, Goossens V, Bhattacharya S, Castilla JA, Ferraretti AP, Korsak V, Kupka M, et al.; European IVF-monitoring (EIM) Consortium, for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2006: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2010;25:1851–1862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 6. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Thorn P, Wischmann T. German guidelines for psychosocial counselling in the area of gamete donation. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2009;12:73–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorn P, Daniels K. Pro und Contra Kindesaufklärung nach donogener Insemination - Neuere Entwicklungen und Ergebnisse einer explorativen Studie. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2007;67:993–1001.
   Google Scholar
• Wischmann T. Psychosoziale Aspekte der Spendersamenbehandlung - ein Überblick. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2008;68:1147–1153.
   Google Scholar
• Feast J. Donor-assisted conception: What can we learn from adoption? In: Singer D, Hunter M eds Assisted Human Reproduction: Psychological and Ethical Dilemmas. London: Whurr; 2003. pp 76–98.
   Google Scholar
• McWhinnie A. Taking the baby home was just the beginning. In: Singer D, Hunter M eds Assisted Human Reproduction: Psychological and Ethical Dilemmas. London: Whurr; 2003. pp 129–153.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth E. Donor anonymity and secrecy versus openness concerning the genetic origins of the offspring: International perspectives. Jewish Medical Ethics 2006; V:4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels K. Is blood really thicker than water? Assisted reproduction and its impact on our thinking about family. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2005;26:265–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner AJ, Coyle A. What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counselling and therapy. Hum Reprod 2000;15:2041–2051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lycett E, Daniels K, Curson R, Golombok S. Offspring created as a result of donor insemination: a study of family relationships, child adjustment, and disclosure. Fertil Steril 2004;82:172–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadva V, Freeman T, Kramer W, Golombok S. The experiences of adolescents and adults conceived by sperm donation: comparisons by age of disclosure and family type. Hum Reprod 2009;24:1909–1919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Dougall K, Becker G, Scheib JE, Nachtigall RD. Strategies for disclosure: how parents approach telling their children that they were conceived with donor gametes. Fertil Steril 2007;87:524–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennings G. Legal harmonization and reproductive tourism in Europe. Hum Reprod 2004;19:2689–2694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Court of Human Rights. Application no. 57813/00, 03.11.2011. Available: http://www.echr.coe.int/ECHR/homepage_en. Accessed 2011 Nov 20.
   Google Scholar
• Schilling G. Kinder nach donogener (heterologer) Insemination in der Einschätzung ihrer Eltern. Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie 1999;45:354–371.
   Google Scholar
• Yee J. Hundreds of IVF embryo donations “without consent”. In: Bioedge Weekly; 2010; Available from http://www.bioedge.org/index.php/bioethics/bioethics_article/9126/. Accessed 2010 Aug 02.
   Google Scholar
• Pande A. “It may be her eggs, but it’s my body”: Surrogates and everyday forms of kinship in India. Qual Sociol 2009;32:379–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triseliotis J. Identity-formation and the adopted person revisited. In: Treacher A, Katz I eds The dynamics of adoption Social and personal experiences. London: Jessica Kingsley Publisher; 2000. pp 81–98.
   Google Scholar
• Howe D, Feast J. Adoption, search and reunion. The long-term experience of adopted children. London: British Association for Adoption and Fostering (BAAF); 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Storrow RF. The pluralism problem in cross-border reproductive care. Hum Reprod 2010;25:2939–2943.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shenfield F, Pennings G, De Mouzon J, Ferraretti AP, Goossens V; ESHRE Task Force ‘Cross Border Reproductive Care’ (CBRC). ESHRE’s good practice guide for cross-border reproductive care for centers and practitioners. Hum Reprod 2011;26:1625–1627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider I. Indirect commodification of ova donation for assisted reproduction and for human cloning research: Proposals for supranational regulation. In: Steinmann M, Sýkora P, Wiesing U eds Altruism reconsidered Exploring new approaches to property in human tissue. Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate; 2009:209–241.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kinderwunschberatung - BKiD. Leitlinien “Psychosoziale Beratung für Frauen und Männer, die eine Kinderwunschbehandlung im Ausland beabsichtigen (BKiD-Leitlinien “reproduktives Reisen”). In: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kinderwunschberatung - Beratungsnetzwerk Kinderwunsch Deutschland e.V.; 2010. Available: http://www.bkid.de/cbrc_leitlinien.pdf. Accessed 2010 May 17.
   Google Scholar
• International Consumer Support for Infertility (iCSi). Travelling abroad for assisted reproductive (ART) treatment. In: International Consumer Support for Infertility; 2008. Available: http://www.icsicommunity.org/information/fact-sheets/travelling-abroad-for-art. Accessed 2010 July 07.
   Google Scholar
• Thorn P. Reproduktives Reisen - eine Expertise für den Pro Familia Bundesverband.Frankfurt, 2008. Available: http://www.profamilia.de/shop/download/285.pdf. Accessed 2009 Sept 24.
   Google Scholar
• Thorn P, Wischmann T. Psychosoziale Aspekte der assistierten Reproduktion. Gutachten für den Deutschen Bundestag (not published), cited in: Revermann C, Hüsing B. Fortpflanzungsmedizin - Rahmenbedingungen, wissenschaftlich-technische Fortschritte und Folgen. Edition Sigma, Berlin, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Thorn P. Bewertung der aktuellen Datenlage “Reproduktives Reisen” für die mögliche Erstellung einer Informationsschrift für Patienten. pro familia Bundesverband (unpublished) 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Dostál J. Ethical and legal aspects of assisted reproduction. Situation in the member states that joined the European Union in 2004. Olomouc: Placky University, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Jones HW Jr, Cooke I, Kempers R, Brinsden P, Saunders D. International Federation of Fertility Societies Surveillance 2010: preface. Fertil Steril 2011;95:491.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang YA, Kovacs G, Sullivan EA. Transfer of a selected single blastocyst optimizes the chance of a healthy term baby: a retrospective population based study in Australia 2004–2007. Hum Reprod 2010;25:1996–2005.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004. Available: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=de&type_doc=Directive&an_doc = 2004&nu_doc = 23. Accessed 2011 March 25.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin S. Reproductive Options I. A spermdonor baby grows up. In: Zimmermann J ed The technological women: Interfacing with tomorrow. New York: Praeger; 1983. pp 211–215.
   Google Scholar
• Günther H-L, Taupitz J, Kaiser P. Embryonenschutzgesetz: Juristischer Kommentar mit medizinisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Einführungen. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Wendehorst C. Zur Möglichkeit der Embryonenadoption in einem zukünftigen Fortpflanzungsmedizingesetz. J Reproduktionsmed Endokrinol 2003;19:147–150.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesärztekammer. (Muster-) Richtlinie zur Durchführung der assistierten Reproduktion - Novelle 2006. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 2006; 20:A1392–A1403.
   Google Scholar
• Thorn P, Katzorke T, Daniels K. Semen donors in Germany: a study exploring motivations and attitudes. Hum Reprod 2008;23:2415–2420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. Convention for the protection of Human Rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. CETS No.: 164. 1997. Available: http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/QueVoulezVous.asp?NT = 164&CL=ENG. Accessed 2011 March 28.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, CETS No.: 005. 1950. Available: http://conventions.coe.int/treaty/Commun/QueVoulezVous.asp?NT = 005&CL=ENG. Accessed 2011 March 27.
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare.2008. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_overview/co_operation/healthcare/docs/COM_en.pdf. Accessed 2011 March 27.
   Google Scholar
• International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Ethical issues in obstetrics and gynecology by the FIGO Committee for the study of ethical aspects of human reproduction and women’s health. 2009. Available: http://www.figo.org/files/figo-corp/Ethical Issues - English.pdf. Accessed 2011 March 27.03.
   Google Scholar
• International Planned Parenthood Federation. IPPF Charter on sexual and reproductive rights. 2003. Available: http://www.ippf.org/NR/rdonlyres/6C9013D5-5AD7-442A-A435-4C219E689F07/0/charter.pdf. Accessed 2011 March 27.
   Google Scholar
• International Consumer Support for Infertility. Global principles for assisted conception and infertility: A patients’ rights charter. 2008. Available: http://www.icsicommunity.org/patients-rights%3E. Accessed 2011 March 27.
   Google Scholar
• International Alliance of Patients’ Organizations. What is patient centred health care? A review of definitions and principles. 2007. Available: http://www.patientsorganizations.org/attach.pl/547/494/IAPO Patient-Centred Healthcare Review 2nd edition.pdf. Accessed 2010 June 08.
   Google Scholar