Motivations and experiences of women who accessed “see and treat” cervical cancer prevention services in Zambia

References

• Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 2010;127:2893–2917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankaranarayanan R, Nene BM, Shastri SS, Jayant K, Muwonge R, Budukh AM, Hingmire S, et al.. HPV screening for cervical cancer in rural India. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1385–1394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankaranarayanan R, Esmy PO, Rajkumar R, Muwonge R, Swaminathan R, Shanthakumari S, Fayette JM, Cherian J. Effect of visual screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Tamil Nadu, India: a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet 2007;370:398–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denny L, Kuhn L, De Souza M, Pollack AE, Dupree W, Wright TC Jr. Screen-and-treat approaches for cervical cancer prevention in low-resource settings: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005;294:2173–2181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauvaget C, Fayette JM, Muwonge R, Wesley R, Sankaranarayanan R. Accuracy of visual inspection with acetic acid for cervical cancer screening. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011;113:14–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaffikin L, Lauterbach M, Blumenthal PD. Performance of visual inspection with acetic acid for cervical cancer screening: a qualitative summary of evidence to date. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2003;58:543–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantanowitz L, Michelow P. Review of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and squamous lesions of the uterine cervix. Diagn Cytopathol 2011;39:65–72.
   Google Scholar
• Palefsky JM. Cervical human papillomavirus infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women positive for human immunodeficiency virus in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Curr Opin Oncol 2003;15:382–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heard I, Tassie JM, Schmitz V, Mandelbrot L, Kazatchkine MD, Orth G. Increased risk of cervical disease among human immunodeficiency virus-infected women with severe immunosuppression and high human papillomavirus load(1). Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:403–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldie SJ, Gaffikin L, Goldhaber-Fiebert JD, Gordillo-Tobar A, Levin C, Mahé C, Wright TC; Alliance for Cervical Cancer Prevention Cost Working Group. Cost-effectiveness of cervical-cancer screening in five developing countries. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2158–2168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tebeu PM, Major AL, Mhawech P, Rapiti E. The recurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in HIV-positive women: a review of the literature. Int J STD AIDS 2006;17:507–511.
   Google Scholar
• Heard I, Potard V, Foulot H, Chapron C, Costagliola D, Kazatchkine MD. High rate of recurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after surgery in HIV-positive women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2005;39:412–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). Report on the Global HIV/AIDS Epidemic 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ng’andwe C, Lowe JJ, Richards PJ, Hause L, Wood C, Angeletti PC. The distribution of sexually-transmitted Human Papillomaviruses in HIV positive and negative patients in Zambia, Africa. BMC Infect Dis 2007;7:77.
   Google Scholar
• Parham GP, Sahasrabuddhe VV, Mwanahamuntu MH, Shepherd BE, Hicks ML, Stringer EM, Vermund SH. Prevalence and predictors of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix in HIV-infected women in Lusaka, Zambia. Gynecol Oncol 2006;103:1017–1022.
   Google Scholar
• Mwanahamuntu MH, Sahasrabuddhe VV, Pfaendler KS, Mudenda V, Hicks ML, Vermund SH, Stringer JS, Parham GP. Implementation of “see-and-treat” cervical cancer prevention services linked to HIV care in Zambia. AIDS 2009;23:N1–N5.
   Google Scholar
• Szarewski A. Social and psychological aspects of cervical screening. Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol 2011;6:37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Gatune JW, Nyamongo IK. An ethnographic study of cervical cancer among women in rural Kenya: is there a folk causal model? Int J Gynecol Cancer 2005;15:1049–1059.
   Google Scholar
• Wood K, Jewkes R, Abrahams N. Cleaning the womb: constructions of cervical screening and womb cancer among rural black women in South Africa. Soc Sci Med 1997;45:283–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangoma JF, Chirenje MZ, Chimbari MJ, Chandiwana SK. An assessment of rural women’s knowledge, constraints and perceptions on cervical cancer screening: the case of two districts in Zimbabwe. Afr J Reprod Health 2006;10:91–103.
   Google Scholar
• McFarland DM. Cervical cancer and Pap smear screening in Botswana: knowledge and perceptions. Int Nurs Rev 2003;50:167–175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health 2000;23:334–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zambia Ministry of Health. Kanyama Health Centre Action Plan 2009-2011. Report. Lusaka: Zambia Ministry of Health, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Sankaranarayanan R, Wesley RS. A practical manual on visual screening for cervical neoplasia. International Agency for Research on Cancer [IARC]. WHO [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2011 05 April]; Available at: http://screening.iarc.fr/viavili.php
   Google Scholar
• Pfaendler KS, Mwanahamuntu MH, Sahasrabuddhe VV, Mudenda V, Stringer JS, Parham GP. Management of cryotherapy-ineligible women in a “screen-and-treat” cervical cancer prevention program targeting HIV-infected women in Zambia: lessons from the field. Gynecol Oncol 2008;110:402–407.
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 2004;24:105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mock J, McPhee SJ, Nguyen T, Wong C, Doan H, Lai KQ, Nguyen KH, et al.. Effective lay health worker outreach and media-based education for promoting cervical cancer screening among Vietnamese American women. Am J Public Health 2007;97:1693–1700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutyaba, T, Mmiro, FA, Weiderpass, E. (2007). Knowledge, attitudes and practices on cervical cancer screening among the medical workers of Mulago Hospital, Uganda. BMC Medical Education, 1, 13.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez RG. “What’s wrong with me?”: cervical cancer in Venezuela–living in the borderlands of health, disease, and illness. Soc Sci Med 2005;61:797–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackerson K, Preston SD. A decision theory perspective on why women do or do not decide to have cancer screening: systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2009;65:1130–1140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parham GP, Mwanahamuntu MH, Pfaendler KS, Sahasrabuddhe VV, Myung D, Mkumba G, Kapambwe S, et al.. eC3–a modern telecommunications matrix for cervical cancer prevention in Zambia. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2010;14:167–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bomfim-Hyppólito S, Franco ES, Franco RG, de Albuquerque CM, Nunes GC. Cervicography as an adjunctive test to visual inspection with acetic acid in cervical cancer detection screening. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2006;92:58–63.
   Google Scholar
• Mbikusita-Lewanika M, Stephen H, Thomas J. The prevalence of the use of “dry sex” traditional medicines, among Zambian women, and the profile of the users. Psychol Health Med 2009;14:227–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins MM, Gabali C, Winkleby M, Gaona E, Lebaron S. Barriers to cervical cancer screening in rural Mexico. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2002;12:475–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovell S, Kearns RA, Friesen W. Sociocultural barriers to cervical screening in South Auckland, New Zealand. Soc Sci Med 2007;65:138–150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Schalkwyk SL, Maree JE, Wright SC. Cervical cancer: the route from signs and symptoms to treatment in South Africa. Reprod Health Matters 2008;16:9–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health program planning: an educational and ecological approach. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education; 2005.
   Google Scholar