References
- Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care. Rutinmässig ultraljudsundersökning under graviditet (Routine ultrasound screening during pregnancy) (SBU-rapport nr 139). In Swedish, Stockholm: SB Offset AB; 1998
- Kublickas M, Crossley J, Aitken D. Screening for Down’s syndrome in the first trimester: combined risk calculation, methodology, and validation of a web-based system. Acta Obstet Gynaecol 2009;88:635–8
- Spencer K, Souter V, Tul N, et al. A screening program for trisomy 21 at 10–14 weeks using fetal nuchal translucency, maternal serum free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;13:231–7
- Saltvedt S, Almström H. Fetal loss rate after second trimester amniocentesis at different gestational age. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999;78:10–14
- Green J, Hewison J, Bekker HL, et al. Psychological aspects of genetic screening of pregnant women and newborns: a systematic review. Health Tech Assess 2004;8:iii, ix--x, 1–109
- Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care. Metoder för tidig fosterdiagnostik (Methods for early fetal diagnosis) (SBU-rapport nr 182). In Swedish, Stockholm; 2006
- Placek Lederman R. Anxiety and stress in pregnancy: significance and nursing assessment. NAACOG Clin Issue Perinat Women Health Nurs 1990;1:279–88
- Shereshefsky P, Yarrow L. Psychological aspects of a first pregnancy and early postnatal adaptation. New York: Raven press; 1975
- Statham H, Green JM, Kafetsios K. Who worries that something might be wrong with the baby? A prospective study of 1072 pregnant women. Birth 1997;24:223–33
- Green JM, Statham H. Testing for fetal abnormality in routine antenatal care (clinical review). Midwifery 1993;9:124–35
- Hoskovec J, Mastrobattista JM, Johnston D, et al. Anxiety and prenatal testing: do women with soft ultrasound findings have increased anxiety compared to women with other indications for testing? Prenat Diagn 2008;28:135–40.
- Georgsson Öhman S, Saltvedt S, Grunewald C, Waldenström U. Does fetal screening affect women’s worries about the health of their baby? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004;83:634–40.
- Kaiser AS, Ferris LE, Katz R, et al. Psychological responses to prenatal NTS counselling and the uptake of invasive testing in women of advanced maternal age. Pat Educ Couns 2004;54:45–53
- Kaiser AS, Ferris LE, Pastuszak A, et al. The effects of prenatal group genetic counselling on knowledge, anxiety and decisional conflict. J Obstet Gynaecol 2002;22:246–55
- Thornton JG, van den Borne MPJ, de Bruijn AJE. Risk communication: the patient’s view. Early Hum Dev Suppl 1996;47:13–7
- Martaeu TM. Psychological models in predicting uptake of prenatal screening. Psychol Health 1992;6:13–22
- Ballie C, Hewison J. Ultrasound screening for chromosomal abnormality: women’s reactions to false positive results. Br J Health Psychol 2000;5:377–94
- Georgsson Öhman S, Saltvedt S, Waldenström U, et al. Pregnant women’s responses to information about an increased risk of carrying a baby with Down syndrome. Birth 2006;33:64–73
- Spencer K. Uptake of prenatal screening for chromosomal anomalies: impact of test results in a previous pregnancy. Prenat Diagn 2002;22:1229–32
- Björklund U, Marsk A, Levin C, Georgsson Öhman S. Audiovisual information affects informed choice and experience of information in antenatal Down syndrome screening – a randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns 2012;86:390–5
- Hewison J, Cuckle H, Baillie C, et al. Use of videotapes for viewing at home to inform choice in Down syndrome screening: a randomised controlled trial. Prenat Diagn 2001;21:146–49
- Michie S, Smith D, Marteau TM. Patient decision making: an evaluation of two different methods of presenting information about screening test. Br J Health Psychol 1997;2:317–26
- http://vimeo.com/34600615/ (Film about prenatal examinations, subtitled in English, January 2013); http://vimeo.com/35875428/(Film om fosterdiagnostik, In Swedish. January 2013)
- Spielberger B, Gorush RL, Lushene R. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory STAI. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1970
- Green JM, Kafetsios, K, Statham HE, Snowdon C. Factor structure, validity and reliability of the Cambridge Worry Scale in a pregnant population. Health Psychol 2003;8:753–64
- Georgsson Öhman S, Grunewald C, Waldenström U. Women’s worries during pregnancy: testing the Cambridge Worry Scale on 200 Swedish women. Scand J Caring Sci 2003;17:14–152
- Bruhn JG. The two sides of worry. South Med J 1990;83:557–62
- Davey G, Hampton J, Farrell J, Davidson S. Some characteristics of worrying: evidence for worrying and anxiety as separate constructs. Pers Individ Diff 1992;13:133–47
- Tallis F, Eyseneck M, Mathews A. Elevated evidence requirements and worry. Pers Individ Diff 1991;12:21–7
- Kelly WE. Some evidence for nonpathological and pathological worry as separate constructs: an investigation of worry and boredom. Pers Individ Diff 2002;33:345–54
- Loo R. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory a-trait scale: dimensions and their generalization. J Pers Assess 1979;43:50–3
- Hundley V, Gurney E, Graham W, Rennie AM. Can anxiety in pregnant women be measured using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Midwifery 1998;14:118–21
- Green JM. Calming or harming? A critical review of psychological effects of fetal diagnosis on pregnant women. London: The Galton Institute Occasional Papers; 1990
- Joorman J, Stöber J. Measuring facets of worry. A LISREL analysis of the worry domains questionnaire. Pers Individ Diff 1997;23:827–37