Patient’s willingness to opt for external cephalic version

References

• Hickok DE, Gordon DC, Milberg JA, et al. The frequency of breech presentation by gestational age at birth: a large population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166:851–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evers AC, Brouwers HA, Hukkelhoven CW, et al. Perinatal mortality and severe morbidity in low and high risk term pregnancies in the Netherlands: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2010;341:c5639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietberg CC, Elferink-Stinkens PM, Visser GH. The effect of the Term Breech Trial on medical intervention behaviour and neonatal outcome in The Netherlands: an analysis of 35,453 term breech infants. BJOG 2005;112:205–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilmink FA, Hukkelhoven CW, Lunshof S, et al. Neonatal outcome following elective cesarean section beyond 37 weeks of gestation: a 7-year retrospective analysis of a national registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:250–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Lancet. Caesarean section-the first cut isn’t the deepest. Lancet 2010;375:956
   Google Scholar
• Raynes-Greenow CH, Roberts CL, Barratt A, et al. Pregnant women’s preferences and knowledge of term breech management, in an Australian setting. Midwifery 2004;20:181–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bewley S, Robson SC, Smith M, et al. The introduction of external cephalic version at term into routine clinical practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1993;52:89–93
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yogev Y, Horowitz E, Ben-Haroush A, et al. Changing attitudes toward mode of delivery and external cephalic version in breech presentations. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002;79:221–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann LM, Muhleisen A, Bock A, et al. Vignette studies of medical choice and judgement to study caregivers’ medical decision behaviour: systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2008;8:50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kok M, Van Der Steeg JW, Mol BW, et al. Which factors play a role in clinical decision-making in external cephalic version? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008;87:31–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson V, Ryan M, Brown CT, et al. Eliciting preferences for drug treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 2004;172:2321–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bekker-Grob EW, Essink-Bot ML, Meerding WJ, et al. Patients’ preferences for osteoporosis drug treatment: a discrete choice experiment. Osteoporos Int 2008;19:1029–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grootscholten K, Kok M, Oei SG, et al. External cephalic version-related risks: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:1143–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmeyr GJ. Interventions to help external cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002preprint:CD000184
   Google Scholar
• Jain S, Mulligama C, Tagwira V, et al. Labour outcome of women with successful external cephalic version: a prospective study. J Obstet Gynaecol 2010;30:13–16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vezina Y, Bujold E, Varin J, et al. Cesarean delivery after successful external cephalic version of breech presentation at term: a comparative study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190:763–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, et al. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 2000;356:1375–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsitz SH. Generalized estimating equations for correlated binary data: using the odds ratio as a measure of association. Biometrika 1991;78:153–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijnders M, Offerhaus P, van DP, et al. Prevalence, outcome, and women’s experiences of external cephalic version in a low-risk population. Birth 2010;37:124–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kok M, Cnossen J, Gravendeel L, et al. Clinical factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;28:103--10
   Google Scholar
• Kok M, Cnossen J, Gravendeel L, et al. Ultrasound factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:76–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kok M, Van Der Steeg JW, van der Post JA, Mol BW. Prediction of success of external cephalic version after 36 weeks. Am J Perinatol 2011;28:103–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuppens SM, Hasaart TH, van der Donk MW, et al. Fewer caesarean sections for breech presentation following external cephalic version according to a protocol in a special office visit. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2008;152:1323–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar