Orbital volume augmentation using expandable hydrogel implants in acquired anophthalmia and phthisis bulbi

REFERENCES

• Tyers AG, Collin JR. Orbital implants and post enucleation socket syndrome. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1982; 102 (Pt 1):90–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Das T, Namperumalsamy P. Scleral buckling with hydrogel implant. Ind J Ophthalmol 1991; 39(2):41–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wheeler JC, Woods JA, Cox MJ, Cantrell RW, Watkins FH, Edlich RF. Evolution of hydrogel polymers as contact lenses, surface coatings, dressings, and drug delivery systems. J Long Term Eff Med Implants [Review]. 1996; 6(3-4):207–217.
   Google Scholar
• Wiese KG. Osmotically induced tissue expansion with hydrogels: a new dimension in tissue expansion? A preliminary report. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1993; 21(7):309–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiese KG, Heinemann DE, Ostermeier D, Peters JH. Biomaterial properties and biocompatibility in cell culture of a novel self-inflating hydrogel tissue expander. J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 54(2):179–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacskulin A, Vogel M, Wiese KG, Gundlach K, Hingst V, Guthoff R. New osmotically active hydrogel expander for enlargement of the contracted anophthalmic socket. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol [Comparative Study]. 2000; 238(1):24–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gundlach KK, Guthoff RF, Hingst VH, Schittkowski MP, Bier UC. Expansion of the socket and orbit for congenital clinical anophthalmia. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116(5):1214–1222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoli RA, Raymond WRt, Ainbinder DJ, Hansen EA. Use of self-expanding, hydrophilic osmotic expanders (hydrogel) in the reconstruction of congenital clinical anophthalmos. Curr Opin Ophthalmol [Review] 2004; 15(5):426–431.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schittkowski MP, Gundlach KK, Guthoff RF. [Treatment of congenital clinical anophthalmos with high hydrophilic hydrogel expanders]. Ophthalmologe [Comparative Study]. 2003; 100(7):525–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schittkowski MP, Guthoff RF. Injectable self inflating hydrogel pellet expanders for the treatment of orbital volume deficiency in congenital microphthalmos: preliminary results with a new therapeutic approach. Br J Ophthalmol [Case Reports Evaluation Studies]. 2006; 90(9):1173–1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiese KG, Vogel M, Guthoff R, Gundlach KK. Treatment of congenital anophthalmos with self-inflating polymer expanders: a new method. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1999; 27(2):72–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tawfik HA, Raslan AO, Talib N. Surgical management of acquired socket contracture. Curr Opin Ophthalmol [Review]. 2009; 20(5):406–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adenis JP, Bertin P, Lasudry JG, Boncoeur-Martel MP, Leboutet MJ, Robert PY. Treatment of the postenucleation socket syndrome with a new hydroxyapatite tricalcium phosphate ceramic implant. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 15(4):277–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahill KV, Burns JA. Volume augmentation of the anophthalmic orbit with cross-linked collagen (Zyplast). Arch Ophthalmol [Case Reports] 1989; 107(11):1684–1686.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• da Silva AL, Bredemeier M, Gebrim ES, Moura Eda M. Intraorbital polyacrylamide gel injection for the treatment of anophthalmic enophthalmos. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg [Clinical Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. 2008; 24(5):367–371.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter PD, Baker SS. The treatment of enophthalmos by orbital injection of fat autograft. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994; 120(8):835–839.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kotlus BS, Dryden RM. Correction of anophthalmic enophthalmos with injectable calcium hydroxylapatite (Radiesse). Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg [Case Reports]. 2007 Jul-Aug;23(4):313–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laiseca A, Laiseca D, Laiseca J, Laiseca J, Jr. Correcting superior sulcus deformities. Adv Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg [Review] 1990; 8:229–242.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malhotra R. Deep orbital Sub-Q restylane (nonanimal stabilized hyaluronic acid) for orbital volume enhancement in sighted and anophthalmic orbits. Arch Ophthalmol [Case Reports] 2007; 125(12):1623–1629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vagefi MR, McMullan TF, Burroughs JR, Georgescu D, McCann JD, Anderson RL. Orbital augmentation with injectable calcium hydroxylapatite for correction of postenucleation/evisceration socket syndrome. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 27(2):90–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown SL, Bloom SM. Spontaneous expulsion of a radial miragel scleral buckle. Retina [Case Reports] 2004; 24(2):306–307.
   Google Scholar
• Le Rouic JF, Bettembourg O, D’Hermies F, Azan F, Renard G, Chauvaud D. Late swelling and removal of Miragel buckles: a comparison with silicone indentations. Retina [Comparative Study] 2003; 23(5):641–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney JJ, Lahey JM, Borirakchanyavat S, Schwartz DM, Wilson D, Tanaka SC, et al. Complications of hydrogel explants used in scleral buckling surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2004; 137(1):96–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braunstein RA, Winnick M. Photo essay: complications of Miragel: pseudotumor. Arch Ophthalmol [Case Reports] 2002; 120(2):228–229.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kawano T, Doi M, Miyamura M, Esaki K, Sasoh M, Uji Y. Extrusion and fragmentation of hydrogel exoplant 11 years after scleral buckling surgery. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers [Case Reports] 2002; 33(3):240–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roldan-Pallares M, del Castillo Sanz JL, Awad-El Susi S, Refojo MF. Long-term complications of silicone and hydrogel explants in retinal reattachment surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 1999; 117(2):197–201.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hwang KI, Lim JI. Hydrogel exoplant fragmentation 10 years after scleral buckling surgery. Arch Ophthalmol [Case Reports Letter]. 1997; 115(9):1205–1206.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marin JF, Tolentino FI, Refojo MF, Schepens CL. Long-term complications of the MAI hydrogel intrascleral buckling implant. Arch Ophthalmol [Case Reports Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t Research Support, U.S. Gov’t, P.H.S.]. 1992; 110(1):86–88.
   Google Scholar
• Li K, Lim KS, Wong D. Miragel explant fragmentation 10 years after scleral buckling surgery. Eye (Lond) [Case Reports Letter Review]. 2003; 17(2):248–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardino CR, Mihora LD, Fay AM, Rubin PA. Orbital complications of hydrogel scleral buckles. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg [Case Reports Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. 2006; 22(3):206–208.
   Google Scholar
• Tao JP, LeBoyer RM, Hetzler K, Ng JD, Nunery WR. Inferolateral migration of hydrogel orbital implants in microphthalmia. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg [Case Reports] 2010; 26(1):14–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar