Management of acquired anophthalmos: A historical review

References

• Allen JH, Allen L. A buried muscle cone implant. Arch Ophthalmol 1950; 43: 879–890
   Google Scholar
• Allen L, Spivey BE, Burns CA. A larger Iowa implant. A preliminary report. Am J Ophthalmol 1969; 68: 397–400
   Google Scholar
• Anderson RL. Tarsal strip procedure for correction of eyelid laxity and canthal malposition in the anophthalmic Socket. Ophthalmology 1981; 88: 895–903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arruga H. Improved orbital implant. Am J Ophthalmol 1954; 38: 93–95
   Google Scholar
• Atkins AD, Roper-Hall MJ. Magnetic orbital implants. Br J Ophthalmol 1983; 67: 315–316
   Google Scholar
• Barraquer J. Enucleation with placement of fat graft in Tenon's capsule. Advances in Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 8: The Anophthalmic Socket, SL Bosniak. Pergamon Press, New York 1990; 149–150
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett RE, Lewis F. Evaluation of enućleations and eviscerations. Am J Ophthalmol 1964; 58: 835–839
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett RE. Plastic surgery for the enucleation patient. Am J Ophthalmol 1966; 61: 68–78
   Google Scholar
• Baylis H, Shorr N. Evisceration, enucleation, and exenteration. Oculoplastic Surgery, CD McCord, Jr. Raven Press, New York 1981; 313–326
   Google Scholar
• Baylis H, Shorr N. Corrections of problems of the anophthalmic Socket. Oculoplastic Surgery, ch. 16, CD McCord, Jr. Raven Press, New York 1981; 327–347
   Google Scholar
• Beard C. Ptosis, 3rd edn. The CV Mosby Co, St Louis 1981; 39–75
   Google Scholar
• Bello WM, Levine MR. Superior sulcus deformity. Arch Ophthalmol 1980; 98: 2215–2216
   Google Scholar
• Brenner DE, Whitley NO, Houk TL, et al. Volume determinations in computed tomography. JAMA 1982; 247: 1299–1302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choyce DP. Orbital implants. Br J Ophthalmol 1952; 36: 123–130
   Google Scholar
• Collin J RO. Socket surgery. A Manual of Systemic Eyelid Surgery, J RO Collin. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh 1983; 96–109
   Google Scholar
• Conn H, Tenzel D, Schou K. Subperiosteal volume augmentation of the anophthalmic Socket with RTV Silastic. Advances in Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 8: The Anophthalmic Socket, SL Bosniak. Pergamon Press, New York 1990; 220–228
   Google Scholar
• Connelly FJ. Superior sulcus deformity. Prosthetic correction. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1970; 10(4)799–802
   Google Scholar
• Culler AM. Enucleation and cosmetic rehabilitation. Arch Ophthalmol 1951; 45: 445–457
   Google Scholar
• Culler AM. Symposium: Orbital implants after enucleation. Basic principles of anatomy and physiology of the orbit and relation to implant surgery. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1952; 56: 17–20
   Google Scholar
• Cutler NL. A positive contact ball and ring implant for use after enucleation. Arch Ophthalmol 1947; 37: 73–81
   Google Scholar
• Cutler NL. Fascia-lata transplant for retrotarsal atrophy of upper lid following enucleation. Am J Ophthalmol 1946; 29: 176–179
   Google Scholar
• Danz W. Ancient and contemporary history of artificial eyes. Advances in Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 8: The Anophthalmic Socket, SL Bosniak. Pergamon Press, New York 1990; 1–10
   Google Scholar
• Danz W. Mobility implants: A review. Advances in Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 8: The Anophthalmic Socket, SL Bosniak. Pergamon Press, New York 1990; 46–52
   Google Scholar
• DeVoe AG. Experiences with the surgery of the anophthalmic orbit. Am J Ophthalmol 1945; 28: 1346–1351
   Google Scholar
• Dimitry TJ. The Socket after enucleation and the artificial eye. Arch Ophthalmol 1944; 31: 18–28
   Google Scholar
• Dortzbach RK, Alexander SC, Sutula FC, Hawes MJ. Correction of facial contour deformities with prefabricated sculptured implants. Ophthalmology 1981; 88: 908–916
   Google Scholar
• Dortzbach RK, Woog JJ. Choice of procedure: Enucleation, evisceration or prosthetic fitting over globes. Ophthalmology 1985; 92: 1249–1255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durham DG. The new ocular implants. Am J Ophthalmol 1949; 32: 79–89
   Google Scholar
• Ellis OH. A new orbital implant. Am J Ophthalmol 1949; 32(2)990–992
   Google Scholar
• Erpf SF, Wirtz MS, Dietz VH. Plastic artificial eye program, U.S. Army. Am J Ophthalmol 1946; 29: 984–992
   Google Scholar
• Forbes GS, Earnest F, Waller RR. Computed tomography of orbital tumors, including late-generation scanning techniques. Radiology 1982; 142: 387–394
   Google Scholar
• Fox SA. Enucleation and allied procedures. Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery, SA Fox. Grune & Stratton, New York and London 1970; 475–501
   Google Scholar
• Fox SA. Bony orbit repairs and late complications. Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery, SA Fox. Grune & Stratton, New York and London 1970; 463–474
   Google Scholar
• Fox SA. Socket repairs. Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery, SA Fox. Grune & Stratton, New York and London 1970; 449–462
   Google Scholar
• Frost WA. Cited in Lane W: On the insertion of artificial globes into Tenon's capsule after excising the eye. Trans Ophthalmol SOC UK 1887; 7: 286
   Google Scholar
• Frueh BR, Felker GV. Baseball implant. A method of secondary insertion of an intraorbital implant. Arch Ophthalmol 1976; 94: 429–430
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gale ME, Vincent ME, Sutula FC. Orbital implants and prostheses: Postoperative computed tomographic appearance 1985; 6: 403–407
   Google Scholar
• Van Gemert JV, Leone CR. Correction of a deep superior sulcus with dermis-fat implantation. Arch Ophthalmol 1986; 104: 604–607
   Google Scholar
• Gougelmann HP. The evolution of the ocular motility implant. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1970; 10(4)689–711
   Google Scholar
• Greear JN. The use of buccal mucosa in the restoration of the orbital Socket. Am J Ophthalmol 1948; 31: 445–453
   Google Scholar
• Guyton JS. Enucleation and allied procedures. Part I: A review. Am J Ophthalmol 1949; 32: 1517–1534
   Google Scholar
• Guyton JS. Enucleation and allied procedures. Part II: A survey of semiburied implants. Am J Ophthalmol 1949; 32: 1725–1734
   Google Scholar
• Guyton JS. Symposium: Orbital implants after enucleation. Procedures and physiologic factors. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1952; 56: 21–24
   Google Scholar
• Härting F, Koornneef L, Peeters H JF, Gillissen J PA. Complications in orbital implant surgery - worthy of mention. Orbit 1985; 4: 105–109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helveston EM. Human bank scleral patch for repair of exposed or extruded orbital implants. Arch Ophthalmol 1969; 82: 83–86
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hill JC, Radford CJ. Treatment of advancing enophthalmos. Am J Ophthalmol 1965; 60: 487–492
   Google Scholar
• Hneleski JS, Shannon GM. Orbital floor implant. Am J Ophthalmol 1973; 76: 540–542
   Google Scholar
• Hughes WL. Symposium: Orbital implants after enucleation. Classification and mechanics involved. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1952; 56: 25–27
   Google Scholar
• Iliff CE. The extruded implant. Arch Ophthalmol 1967; 78: 742–744
   Google Scholar
• Jobe R, Iverson R, Vistnes L. Bone deformation beneath alloplastic implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973; 51: 169–173
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jordan DR, Anderson RL, Nerad JA, Allen L. A preliminary report on the Universal implant. Arch Ophthalmol 1987; 105: 1726–1731
   Google Scholar
• Karesh JW, Putterman AM, Fett DR. Conjunctiva-Müller's muscle excision to correct anophthalmic ptosis. Ophthalmology 1986; 93: 1068–1071
   Google Scholar
• Kelley JJ. History of ocular prostheses. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1970; 10: 713–719
   Google Scholar
• Koornneef L, Zonneveld FW. The role of direct multiplanar high resolution CT in the assessment and management of orbital trauma. Radiol Clin North Am 1987; 25: 753–766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koornneef L. Spatial Aspects of Orbital Musculo-Fibrous Tissue in Man. Swets & Zeitlinger, Amsterdam 1977
   Google Scholar
• Kronish JW, Gonnering RS, Dortzbach RK, Rankin J HG, Reid DL, Phernetton TM. The pathophysiology of the anophthalmic Socket. Part I. Analysis of orbital blood flow. Ophthalm Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 6: 77–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronish JW, Gonnering RS, Dortzbach RK, Rankin J HG, Reid DL, Phernetton TM, Pitts WC, Berry GJ. The pathophysiology of the anophthalmic Socket. Part II. Analysis of orbital fat. Ophthalm Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 6: 88–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laiseca A, Laiseca D, Laiseca J, Laiseca J, Jr. Correcting superior sulcus deformities. Advances in Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 8: The Anophthalmic Socket, SL Bosniak. Pergamon Press, New York 1990; 229–242
   Google Scholar
• Leone CR. Correction of superior sulcus defects after enucleation. Advances in Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 8: The Anophthalmic Socket, SL Bosniak. Pergamon Press, New York 1990; 209–213
   Google Scholar
• Lisman RD, Smith BC. Dermis-fat grafting. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol 2, BC Smith, RC Della Rocca, FA Nesi, RD Lisman. The CV Mosby Co, Saint Louis 1987; 1308–1320
   Google Scholar
• Luce CM. A short history of enucleation. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1970; 10: 681–687
   Google Scholar
• Marcks KM, Zugsmith GS. Plastic repair of deformities of the Socket and minor defects about the orbit. Arch Ophthalmol 1946; 36: 55–69
   Google Scholar
• Moore T. A screw-type implant. Am J Ophthalmol 1952; 35: 399–404
   Google Scholar
• Morax S. Use of Gore-Tex (polytetrafluoroethylene) in the anophthalmic Socket. Advances in Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 8: The Anophthalmic Socket, SL Bosniak. Pergamon Press, New York 1990; 82–87
   Google Scholar
• Mules PH. Evisceration of the globe, with artificial vitreous. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1885; 5: 200–206
   Google Scholar
• Müller FA, Müller AC. Das künstliche Auge. JF Bergmann, Wiesbaden 1910
   Google Scholar
• Mustardé JC. The eye Socket. Repair and Reconstruction in the Orbital Region, JC Mustardé. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, London, New York 1980; 215–244
   Google Scholar
• Nolan WB, Vistnes LM. Correction of lower eyelid ptosis in the anophthalmic orbit: a long term follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 72: 289–292
   Google Scholar
• Nunery WR, Hetzler KJ. Improved prosthetic motility following enucleation. Ophthalmology 1983; 90: 1110–1115
   Google Scholar
• Oberfeld S, Levine MR. Diagnosis and treatment of complications of enucleation and orbital implant surgery. Advances in Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 8: The Anophthalmic Socket, SL Bosniak. Pergamon Press, New York 1990; 107–117
   Google Scholar
• Perry AC. Integrated orbital implants. Advances in Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 8: The Anophthalmic Socket, SL Bosniak. Pergamon Press, New York 1990; 75–81
   Google Scholar
• Petrelli RL. Use of autogenous materials in reconstructing the anophthalmic Socket. Advances in Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 8: The Anophthalmic Socket, SL Bosniak. Pergamon Press, New York 1990; 153–169
   Google Scholar
• Reisberg DJ, Habakuk SW. A history of facial and ocular prosthesis. Advances in Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 8: The Anophthalmic Socket, SL Bosniak. Pergamon Press, New York 1990; 11–24
   Google Scholar
• Roper-Hall MJ. Magnetic orbital implant. Br J Ophthalmol 1956; 40: 575
   Google Scholar
• Roper-Hall MJ. Orbital implants. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1954; 74: 337–346
   Google Scholar
• Rose GE, Sigurdsson H, Collin R. The volume-deficient orbit: clinical characteristics, surgical management, and results after extraperiorbital implantation of Silastic block. Br J Ophthalmol 1990; 74: 545–550
   Google Scholar
• Ruedemann AD. Plastic eye implant. Am J Ophthalmol 1946; 29: 947–952
   Google Scholar
• Della Schaefer DP, Rocca RC. Enucleation. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol 2, BC Smith, RC Della Rocca, FA Nesi, RD Lisman. The CV Mosby Co, St Louis 1987; 1278–1299
   Google Scholar
• Sergott TJ, Vistnes LM. Correction of enophthalmos and superior sulcus depression in the anophthalmic orbit: A long-term follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987; 79(3)331–338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon GM, White RH, Yassin JG. A modification of the correction of enophthalmos. Arch Ophthalmol 1972; 87: 652–654
   Google Scholar
• Sherman AE. The retracted eye Socket. Am J Ophthalmol 1952; 35: 89–101
   Google Scholar
• Siliquini JJ. Migration and extrusion of the implant. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1970; 10(4)843–849
   Google Scholar
• Silverstone PJ, Beyer-Machule CK, Schaefer DP, Della Rocca RC. Treatment of anophthalmos and Socket reconstruction. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol 2, BC Smith, RC Della Rocca, FA Nesi, RD Lisman. The CV Mosby Co, St Louis 1987; 1329–1359
   Google Scholar
• Smerdon DL, Sutton GA. Analysis of the factors involved in cosmetic failure following excision of the eye. Br J Ophthalmol 1988; 72: 768–773
   Google Scholar
• Smit TJ, Koornneef L., Mourits M Ph, Groet E, Otto AJ. Primary versus secondary intraorbital implants. Ophthalm Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 6: 115–118
   Google Scholar
• Smit TJ, Koornneef L., Zonneveld FW, Groet E, Otto AJ. Computed tomography in the assessment of the post-enucleation Socket syndrome. Ophthalmology 1990; 97: 1347–1351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smit TJ, Koornneef L, Zonneveld FW, Groet E, Otto AJ. Primary and secondary implants in the anophthalmic orbit: Preoperative and postoperative computed tomographic appearance. Ophthalmology 1991; 98: 106–110
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith B, Bosniak SL, Lisman RD. An autogenous kinetic dermis-fat orbital implant: an updated technique. Ophthalmology 1982; 89: 1067–1071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith B, Cherubini TD. Glass bead implantation for anophthalmic enophthalmos. Oculoplastic Surgery, B Smith, TD Cherubini. The CV Mosby Co, Saint Louis 1970; 108–111
   Google Scholar
• Smith B, Lisman RD. Use of sclera and liquid collagen in the camouflage of superior sulcus deformities. Ophthalmology 1983; 90: 230–235
   Google Scholar
• Smith B, Obear M, Leone CR. The correction of enophthalmos by glass bead implantation. Am J Ophthalmol 1967; 64: 1088–1093
   Google Scholar
• Smith B, Petrelli R. Dermis-fat graft as a movable implant within the muscle cone. Am J Ophthalmol 1978; 85: 62–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares E JC. Enucleacao: uso da esclera como implante intratenoniano. Anais do II Congresso Luso Hispano-Brasileiro de Oftalmologia 1972; 155–168
   Google Scholar
• Soares E JC. Implante tardio: uso da esclera com conservacao da cornea. Rev Brad de Oftalmol 1974; 33(3)
   Google Scholar
• Soll DB. The anophthalmic Socket. Ophthalmology 1982; 89: 407–423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soll DB. Evolution and current concepts in the treatment of the anophthalmic orbit. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol 2, BC Smith, RC Della Rocca, FA Nesi, RD Lisman. The CV Mosby Co, St Louis 1987; 1321–1328
   Google Scholar
• Soll DB. Donor sclera in enucleation surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 1974; 92: 494–495
   Google Scholar
• Soll DB. Enucleation surgery. A new technique. Arch Ophthalmol 1972; 87: 196–197
   Google Scholar
• Soll DB. Insertion of secondary intraorbital implants. Arch Ophthalmol 1973; 89: 214–216
   Google Scholar
• Soll DB. Correction of the superior lid sulcus with subperiosteal implants. Arch Ophthalmol 1971; 85: 188–190
   Google Scholar
• Soll DB. Evolution and current concepts in the surgical treatment of the anophthalmic orbit. Ophthalm Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 6: 163–171
   Google Scholar
• Spivey BE, Allen L, Burns CA. The Iowa enucleation implant: A ten-year evaluation of techniques and results. Am J Ophthalmol 1969; 67: 171–188
   Google Scholar
• Spivey BE, Allen L, Stewart WB. Surgical correction of superior sulcus deformity occurring after enucleation. Am J Ophthalmol 1976; 82: 365–370
   Google Scholar
• Stone W, Jr. Complications of evisceration and enucleation. Complications in Eye Surgery, 2nd ed, RM Fasanella. WB Saunders, Philadelphia 1965; 388–425
   Google Scholar
• Sugar HS, Forestner HJ. Methacrylic resin implant for sunken upper lid following enucleation. Am J Ophthalmol 1946; 29: 993–1000
   Google Scholar
• Sutula FC, Thomas O. Repair of the superior sulcus deformity using autogenous costal cartilage. Ophthalmology 1982; 89: 424–427
   Google Scholar
• Trawnik WR. Care of ocular prosthesis. Advances in Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 8: The Anophthalmic Socket, SL Bosniak. Pergamon Press, New York 1990; 146–148
   Google Scholar
• Troutman RC. Five-year survey on use of a magnetic implant for improving cosmetic result of enucleation. Arch Ophthalmol 1954; 52: 58–62
   Google Scholar
• Troutman RC. Symposium: Orbital implants after enucleation. End results of implant surgery. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1952; 56: 30–34
   Google Scholar
• Tyers AG, Collin J RO. Orbital implants and post enucleation Socket syndrome. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1982; 102: 90–92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyers AG, Collin J RO. Experience with scleral covered orbital implants. Orbit 1985; 4: 147–151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyers AG, Collin J RO. Baseball orbital implants: a review of 39 patients. Br J Ophthalmol 1985; 69: 438–442
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vistnes LM. Surgical Reconstruction in the Anophthalmic Orbit. Aesculapius Publishing Co, Birmingham (AL) 1987
   Google Scholar
• Vistnes LM. Mechanism of upper lid ptosis in the anophthalmic orbit. Plast Reconstr Surg 1976; 58: 539–545
   Google Scholar
• Vistnes LM, Iverson RE, Hub DR. The anophthalmic orbit. Surgical correction of lower eyelid ptosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973; 52: 346–351
   Google Scholar
• Vistnes LM, Paris GL. Uses of RTV silicone in orbital reconstruction. Am J Ophthalmol 1977; 83: 577–581
   Google Scholar
• Weiss RA, McCord CD, Ellsworth RM. Reconstruction of the anophthalmic Socket: Lower eyelid malposition and canthal tendon laxity. Advances in Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 8: The Anophthalmic Socket, SL Bosniak. Pergamon Press, New York 1990; 192–208
   Google Scholar
• Zbylski JR, LaRossa DD, Rich JD. Correction of lower eyelid ptosis in the anophthalmic orbit with an autogenous ear cartilage graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 61: 220–224
   Google Scholar
• Zolli C, Shannon GM. Experience with donor sclera for extruding orbital implants. Ophthalm Surg 1977; 8(1)63–70
   Google Scholar
• Zonneveld FW. Computed Tomography of the Temporal Bone and Orbit. Urban & Schwarzenberg, Munich 1987
   Google Scholar